JREnsey August 2020 blog

Thanks for joining us for the August edition!


The Word for Today

When everything was ready, the Lord said to Noah, ‘Go into the boat with all your family, for among all the people of the earth, I can see that you alone are righteous. Take with you seven pairs—male and female—of each animal I have approved for eating and for sacrifice, and take one pair of each of the others.’” (Genesis 7:1-2 NLT). “Haven’t you read the Scriptures?” Jesus replied. “They record that from the beginning ‘God made them male and female’” (Matthew 19:4 NLT).

[Oops…Evidently, no one had informed the Lord or Noah that other genders and polyamorous groups had apparently developed since creation, and that they were being omitted from among the flood survivors. I guess they all perished in that judgment. Among the human survivors there only were four couples of men and wives, males and females, saved. In the seventeen biblical references where genders are mentioned, only two are listed—male and female. President Lincoln once put a question to some politicians: If you called a dog’s tail a leg, how many legs would he have? No, not five. Only four. Just because you call a dog’s tail a leg didn’t make it one. Just because someone calls themselves something they actually are not doesn’t make it true.]


Bookburning in the digital age

“Since the death of George Floyd, it has become apparent that we must censor any form of media that could be considered ‘offensive’ to anyone, anywhere. Rest in Power, George Floyd.”1 The Cancel Culture is targeting the printed page.

National Public Radio (NPR) is a liberal-guided, government sponsored broadcast heard across our nation and received in many nations around the world. A program which aired on June 6, and was followed by an article titled Your Bookshelf May Be Part of the Problem, has evoked memories of the bookburnings of the past.

The heart of the story was the suggestion that “white people need to examine their bookshelves and see if they are only reading authors who look like them.” That would be a racist comment if the person made the same suggestion to people of color regarding black authors. The story then suggests people expand their reading lists to include more diverse authors and viewpoints. “Reading broadly and with intention is how we counter dehumanization and demand visibility, effectively bridging the gap between what we read and how we might live in a more just and equitable society,” they said.

My, what a word picture into which to frame one’s own racism. Denials all around, however, would be forthcoming should they hear such an opinion. It is widely known that NPR is fairly consistent in its slanted news and support for socialist causes. They can see racism everywhere except in their own reports. Don’t you just feel warm and fuzzy that millions of your tax dollars fund NPR to broadcast leftist ideals? Defund the NPR.

What revolutionary forces in America are into is bookburning in the digital age. They are coming after the conservative book publishers. Blocking their sale sites on the Internet is on the agenda. The “cancel culture” wants to shut down your access to all news outlets that do not propagate the revolutionary narrative. That is the fascist way, the totalitarian way, the communist way. Revolutions are usually begun with the brainwashing of students in public schools and universities, closing their minds and motivating them to censor all opposing views. It was the students who led the bookburnings in Nazi Germany in 1933.

Wikipedia lists 198 incidences of bookburning over the centuries, most by the author’s political opponents. In the process, some very important biblical manuscripts have been among the works that were burned.

China’s first emperor, Qin Shihuangdi (259-210 B.C.) completely altered the nation’s history by demanding the destruction of all literature with Confucian philosophy. Anecdotes—without definitive proof—also link Qin to the live burial genocide of scholars he deemed culturally threatening. (Likely no protesters showed up carrying signs reading, “I Can’t Breathe.”) Modern communists in China seem to have bookburnings on the calendar during every decade.

The Nalanda University and its library in India allegedly took months to fully burn to the ground when ransacked by Muslim invaders in 1197. In the fifth century, this most resplendent educational institution of its time launched many common higher-ed standards still in use today, such as entrance exams and student housing. Eventually, it came to host the then-largest collection of important Buddhist and Hindu texts. Muslims prefer all literature that opposes Islam to be burned.

On December 20, 1409 Pope Alexander V issued a papal bull that empowered the illiterate Prague Archbishop Házmburka to proceed against Wycliffism in that city. All copies of Wycliffe’s writings were to be surrendered, his doctrines repudiated, and free preaching discontinued. The Wycliffe books and valuable manuscripts were burned in the court of the Archbishop’s palace.

Girolamo Savonarola of Florence, before his excommunication as a Dominican cleric, tried to cleanse Italian society of all things he deemed too decadent or pagan. In 1497, more than just books ended up in his massive bonfires, including art, mirrors, makeup, music, clothing types, games, and other aesthetic or luxury goods. It has since been known as the Bonfire of the Vanities.

Today’s historians are fortunate to know anything about the Mayan civilization at all since the Mexican Catholic Bishop of Yucatan Diego de Landa’s purging of its productions on July 12, 1561.

Beginning on May 10, 1933, Nazi-dominated student groups carried out public burnings of books they claimed were “un-German.” The burnings took place in 34 university towns and cities. Works of prominent Jewish or anti-Nazi writers ended up in the bonfires. The bookburnings stood as a powerful symbol of Nazi intolerance and censorship. The Nazi regime raided book stores, libraries, and publishers’ warehouses to confiscate and burn materials it deemed dangerous or “un-German.”

Could it happen here? Not only could but probably will.

Sources include:




1 https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZQhSxXvTraM/


Is your church sufficiently “diverse”?

Continued fervent advocacy of “diversity,” ordinarily a good word and a great concept, will not likely have a positive outcome, either in religious or political contexts. The reason: there is no place for it to stop, certainly not with race and nationality. It plays into the hands of those pushing “identity politics.” Always remember: its cup is never full.

On a wet, snowy day, start a snowball rolling down from the top of a long hill. Theoretically, by the time it has reached the bottom, it might be the size of a building, destroying everything in its path. “Ah, it is just a harmless snowball. And snowballs are good things, often marking fun times.” That is the way virtually every social engineering movement begins. Now it is just a nice little political theory, or a nifty idea to make a small group of people more visible, but later it may be ravaging whole communities and even nations.

Diversity has taken on many hues and dimensions in recent years, but let us focus on one. Diversity of nationalities and skin colors in a Christian congregation is no problem—a good thing. However, overemphasis on that aspect can invite compromise in order to achieve it when pressured to establish it as a goal. “Whosoever will” is still the gospel’s objective, and should not be discarded in the attempt to “represent our community in appearance” at all costs. The church that draws racial lines is itself out of line, but there is no scriptural mandate that every congregation have people in it to “represent” those of a particular background or skin tone who may reside in their county. The gospel is provided for “all men everywhere” (Acts 17:30). The church should never pass up anyone because of skin color or ethnicity.

Is it just congregations that are all or mostly Caucasian that are being urged toward diversity, or are the African-American churches, the Native American churches, the Indian churches, and the Hispanic churches being urged to evangelize among Caucasians in order to have a “representation” of them in their congregations? Is it a one-way street?

When the church I attend was smaller, a visiting minister from a large city with a sizeable congregation chided us because at that time he didn’t see enough people of a certain racial identity in our small group. Perhaps we should have mentioned the large population of Jews in his city and asked how many he had in his church. My guess would be not many, if even one. People that live in glass houses….

[In the current climate, almost everyone who addresses cultural issues is labeled a racist. In my case, it would be a lie, but such accusations and lies are a dime a dozen today. And the rule of thumb now is if you deny it, it is an admission of guilt. I have been in ministry, pastoring and teaching in visible situations for 65 years. In none of those positions, including the present one, has anyone been excluded based on race, skin color or ethnicity.]


CNN host Don Lemon touts “imperfect” Jesus

“Jesus Christ, if that’s who you believe in, Jesus Christ, admittedly was not perfect when he was here on this earth,” Lemon shrugged. “So why are we deifying the founders of this country, many of whom owned slaves?”

Who responded to that stupid statement? Not a preacher but a coach! Tony Dungy, former coach of an NFL football team, responded with this: “If you don’t agree with the fact that Jesus was sinless on earth then you can throw out the whole Bible because that’s the premise Christianity stands on.” Right on, Tony. We are with you and Pilate: “[We] find in Him no fault at all” (John 18:38).


Worthy observations:

• Communism is for the masses, not the communists. [gopusa]

• Wonder how long it will be until people are sent to the Gulag for leaving their mask at home. Heil…! – Leonidas

• We have seen a little of what real communism would be like. In CHAZ they took one man’s computer and other things and told him that a “disadvantaged person” there needed them more than he did. He was to think of it as an “unplanned donation.” That is the communist way of enforcing “equality.”

• If those on the right were really wrong about the BLM, Antifa, and the commies, they wouldn’t have to employ censorship.

• With so many things coming back in style, I can’t wait until morals, respect, and intelligence become a trend again. – Denzel Washington

• Yale epidemiology professor, Dr. Harvey Risch, said Tuesday on Fox News that he believes the President Trump-touted drug, hydroxychloroquine, could save up to 100,000 lives if used properly to treat the coronavirus. But it doesn’t fit the narrative in this propaganda war.

• When unwanted pregnancy occurs, some women kill the baby in the womb. This is called abortion, and women influenced by the feminist movement claim the right on the basis of “It’s my body and I should have total control over it.” How will this “right” be exercised when mandatory vaccinations are in place? We may then see how much control one can exhibit over his or her body.

• The farther a society drifts from the truth, the more they will hate those who speak it. – George Orwell

• Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason. – Mark Twain

• Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program. – Milton Friedman

• Taylor Swift makes millions singing about her bad choices in men. Endorses Joe Biden.

• If you think voting by mail because of the caronavirus is a great idea, think again. Read this: https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2020/07/13/wisconsins-vote-mail-looked-bad-actually-worse/

• It is worth your time to read this resignation letter by a journalist at the NY Times:  https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter

• Good idea: Subscribe to the PatriotPost, where it is right to be right. Do it here: https://patriotpost.us/subscription/new


Glaring hypocrisy

CNN’s headquarters in Atlanta, where social liberals champion communist causes, witnessed first-hand the destruction that violent riots can cause. After rioters had broken out the glass doors of the building’s entrance, they had to have police and their own security guards keep them from entering the facility. Why didn’t they let them in to plunder the studios of the talking heads who were promoting their own version of kristalnacht? And where was all that security when the mom and pop store down the street was broken into and the elderly proprietors beaten with boards? CNN and similar media need to understand that mob rule will ultimately play no favorites. All white- and right-run corporations are in the crosshairs of the anarchists.

The cable news network, justifiably, wants to keep unwanted intruders from entering their facility. After the riots, they decided that installing a wall is the best method to achieve that purpose. Social media observers were quick to point out the hypocrisy of CNN building reinforced fencing to protect its headquarters. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) lampooned the network by saying, “Walls Don’t Work,” the mantra CNN repeats regarding a wall at our Southern border.

Why doesn’t CNN tell us what purpose their wall expresses that is different from Trump’s wall? And why does any politician opposing a southern wall have a wall around their house or even a fence? Of course, we know why—to keep unauthorized folks out. Should they not have walls, unauthorized persons might keep trespassing on their property, knocking on their door, and looking in their windows, setting up a tent compound on the lawn, and bringing trash onto the premises. When threatened with those possibilities, what do they do? Build a wall! If you have ever been to almost any country south of the border, outside of the barrios you will see lots of walls around a property’s perimeter—with glass shards embedded in the top course of concrete. Even CHAZ/CHOP in Seattle had set up walls. Why? To keep others out (in that case, particularly the police). How did that hopey changey experiment work out for Seattle?]

So, build the wall and let’s move on.


More hypocrisy

Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota has called for the dismantling of not just our nation’s economy, but the entire political system. Add to that her support of “defunding the police” and the “Breathe Act” she is sponsoring along with the rest of the radical Marxist “Squad” members, and you get an idea of their vision for America. Far-left “Squad” members Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) partnered with the coalition Movement for Black Lives in promoting a bill filled with radical proposals.

The two lawmakers reportedly announced the “BREATHE Act” recently in a virtual meeting. It is a bill that includes defunding the police, abolishing ICE, eliminating state gang databases, de-criminalizing prostitution, reducing the Department of Defense budget, establishing a commission to design reparations, de-criminalizes illegal border entry, and develops curricula that “examine the political, economic,  and social impacts of colonialism, genocide against indigenous people, and slavery.” It would also “make recommendations to dramatically reduce the Department of Defense budget. Tlaib described the measure as ushering in a “new vision for public safety.” No police and an impotent military. Wow, what a wonderful program for the American future.

Omar railed against the American economy system as being a “system of oppression” and scolded Americans that we cannot allow people to “prioritize profit without considering who is profiting.” She evidently missed a day in world history class. If being misinformed is skin deep, willful ignorance is to the bone. Why did she scam the immigration system to get to America if it is such an oppressive country?

Speaking of profiting, just ask Omar’s husband Tim Mynett. Mynett runs a consulting company that Omar recently paid over one million $$ for “consulting” and emails and such. Media and Pelosi’s House Ethics Committee: “Nothing to see here.”


Smart saved kids or brainwashed unsaved kids?

Our nation’s children and young adults are being brainwashed about socialist and communist aims which are buried deeply in our government’s public school and college system. Don’t forget that you have the right and the responsibility to teach your children the truth at home and contradict the professors that are dedicated to turning them into mindless robots. Parents should be reminded that in a socialist state everyone is poor and stripped of personal freedom except those in positions of power where corruption is the order of the day.

How can you resist that movement?

First, by homeschooling your children. Early homeschooling not only creates smarter kids but gives them a far better chance of being saved. It is a better choice whenever it can be arranged. For higher education, check out alternative choices—local community colleges, Christian colleges, and private universities that may still be providing real education with a common-sense approach. Vocational and trade schools are out there also. In that vein, remember people with ordinary jobs are generally happier and more apt to be faithful Christians over the long haul than those with “careers” that inhibit Christian service.

Consider online courses that can be done at home that you have scrutinized and determined to be safe and educationally sound. Studying at home has some decided advantages, including remaining in one’s home church.

Second, by removing pride from motivation for degrees. So you graduated from college and want your son or daughter to follow in your footsteps. You must know that it is a different college today than the one you attended when you were 19. Virtually all colleges have been hi-jacked by social movements that oppose free speech, and by liberal professors that are filling their minds with anti-American, and anti-Christian propaganda. The colleges are simply not what they were in your day. Real education is secondary. Brainwashing and social engineering now plays a role in virtually every segment of the curriculum. Be honest with yourself. Put the soul of your son or daughter first before the pride of watching them receive a sheepskin to hang on the wall.

Third, if you are wanting your child to be educated to ensure a good paying career in order to become wealthy, be sure that it is not your retirement that you are really thinking about. Be a parent/grandparent who would rather have saved kids than potentially wealthier kids who are not saved. While there is certainly no absolute guarantee they will be either rich or saved, the effort must be to see that they have every advantage toward being the Christian you always prayed they would be. Don’t urge them into positions where it will be extremely difficult for them to maintain their faith. Why must we keep losing seven or eight of every ten of our kids as they go through the educational experience?

And, really, isn’t every saved kid smarter than any who are unsaved? How smart is someone who would not prefer salvation and heaven over eternity separated from God.


Biden appeals to Muslims to help him defeat Trump

Democrat Joe Biden urged Muslim Americans to join him in the fight to defeat President Donald Trump. “I want to earn your vote not just because he’s not worthy of being president,” the presumptive presidential nominee told participants. “I want to work in partnership with you,
make sure your voices are included in the decision-making process as we work to rebuild our nation.” Biden also reiterated a pledge to overturn a Trump administration ban on travelers from several predominantly Muslim countries, calling it “vile.” (gopusa Eagle)

One wonders to what extent Biden will be obligated to them should he win in November?


“Teach these things…” (I Timothy 4:11; 6:2)

The only way forward for the church is to preach and teach with more gusto and spiritual authority than ever. Teach Bible studies for all who are interested in being eternally saved. And then studies from Scripture on how to stay saved until Jesus comes. One of the best ways to do that is to employ the Into His Marvelous Light one hour Bible study, and its follow-up study, Guide for Living. Order your supply of the soulwinning tools today!

Into His Marvelous Light one-hour Bible study is the easiest to use!

Only $1.75 each up to 49 copies, 1.50 each from 50-99 copies, and only 1.25 for orders IHML_GFL_Revisedof 100 or more. Follow-up study Guide For Living is same price.

Still the best soulwinning tool you can use!

Order online at www.advanceministries.org/ or phone 936-537-0250.


Expressions by impressions

Dr. Fauci says, “Do as I say, not as I do.”


The Last Words

The current pandemic was anticipated at least ten years ago by the liberal Rockefeller Foundation. Here is the report:  https://rwer.wordpress.com/2020/05/28/lock-step-how-the-rockefeller-foundation-wants-to-implement-its-autocratic-pandemic-scenario/

The hardline requirements regarding Covid-19 may be history on Nov. 4 if Joe Biden is elected. In fact, a vaccine may be one of the first announcements made by him.

Isn’t it great that so few are getting the flu this year?

Thanks for visiting! Please be safe, but also be informed. All who are sick with Covid have our concern and prayers.


[Again, be aware that the above opinions and expressions are mine and do not necessarily represent any entity with which I may be associated.]


Published in: on August 1, 2020 at 1:27 AM  Comments (3)  

JREnsey blog for July 2020

The Word for Today

“No, not at all. I am saying that these sacrifices are offered to demons, not to God. And I don’t want you to participate with demons. 21 You cannot drink from the cup of the Lord and from the cup of demons, too. You cannot eat at the Lord’s Table and at the table of demons, too” (I Corinthians 10:20,21 NLT).


Another rush to judgment reveals prejudice and racism in those making accusations


Patrick Hampton, a black blogger, explains that in such cases there is usually a rush to judgment based on the initial press reports, quickly followed by agitators stirring up rage in the black community. Then after weeks or months the truth finally comes out. It seems to be a common pattern. But by the time the full truth is known, the rage leaders have already moved on to another source of rage.

Regarding the recent California “lynching,” a black man’s body was found hanging from a small tree near Palmdale. Community activist Najee Ali was stirring the rage with comments like, “We do believe that white nationalism, white racism, white supremacy is on the rise because of the rise of BlackLivesMatter!” Such statements left the impression it must have been white people who strung him up. Local activists, the rage stirrers, railed against white supremacy, racism, and the usual charges. Of course. The man’s family and a close friend declared there was no way he would take his own life. Those claims were dutifully reported by the leftist press corps, leaving listeners with the idea that a lynching must have taken place since he was not motivated take his own life. Those making those statements may not have known the man had been on suicide watch during two of his terms in jail.

Oops…then a surveillance video surfaced that clearly shows the man tying the cord around his own neck in preparation of taking his life. The activist had to apologize and admit a rush to judgment. Will they never learn?

Black race car driver Bubba Wallace thought the door pull on his garage at the Talladega track was a noose. The nation’s media went wild. Reporters flocked to the track. Some white supremacist’s work, obviously. Every white in America was shamed for such a hateful act as putting a noose in the African-American’s stall. Fifteen FBI agents swooped down to Talladega to investigate. Turned out to be the pull that closes and opens Bubba’s garage the door. This was the sixth “noose” story regarding blacks in the past few years. ALL of them have turned out to be false, fraudulent, or faked. Will the press never learn?

Let’s slow down and take some deep breaths. No one I know wants to go where this revolution is headed. Individuals making assumptions that racism is in everyone’s heart and mass repentance needs to be forthcoming daily, are not solving this problem. Rage does not produce clear thinking.


It was said…

I get most of my exercise these days by shaking my head in disbelief.

Instead of taking down every statue in America, how about actually teaching history again.

Congrats to the Left! By defeating two cartoons, a box of rice, and ice cream bar, a pancake mix, and a bottle of syrup, they solved racism.

The rioters and looters are responsible for their own actions, but conservatives are responsible for what happened hundreds of year ago.

In an interview with a professor from Morgan State University, Ms. Cullors, said: “Myself and Alicia (Garza) in particular are trained organizers. We are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on ideological theories.” (https://nworeport.me/2020/06/24/the-soviet-plan-for-ideological-subversion-describes-our-current-turmoil/)

When referring to African-Americans, writers are now urged to capitalize the term “Blacks” when it is used to indicate their race. But one needn’t bother with capitalization when referring to “whites.” You can notice this practice throughout the recent issues of Time magazine. Don’t rail against racism and then practice it on the same page! I will follow that policy when Time and other left-wing publications get it right—capitalizing both or neither.


Headlines and comments

Roberts and other liberals strike down abortion law

The Supreme Court on Monday, June 22 struck down a Louisiana law regulating abortion clinics, reasserting a commitment to abortion rights over fierce opposition from dissenting conservative justices in the first big abortion case of the Trump era.

Shelter Joe in place

Some polls now have Joe Biden running ahead of Donald Trump by 10 points and sweeping the battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. This vindicates the strategy Biden’s advisers have adopted: Confine Joe to his basement, no press conferences…and the rallies, because it wouldn’t look good to have more attendees at the press conference than the rally.

Students want Lincoln removed

Students in the UW-Madison’s Black student union are calling on university officials to remove the statue of the nation’s 16th president—a campus symbol that has sat atop Bascom Hill for more than a century and represented good luck for students before exams and after graduation.

To BlackLivesMatter, little matters but power

Apparently, for some “protesters,” the irony of their unmitigated ignorance knows no limits. As Peter Heck notes at Dicrn, “Exactly 123 years to the day that it was dedicated, the Shaw Memorial, a monument honoring the first all-volunteer black regiment of the Union Army in the Civil War, was defaced by rioters demanding justice for African-Americans.” Heck recounts, “One of the soldiers, Sgt. William Harvey Carney, carried the American flag throughout the battle, never dropping it despite being shot 7 times. Carney was the first black American to [receive] the Congressional Medal of Honor for action.”

For more information on this growing and powerful, nation transforming movement, check out https://nworeport.me/2020/06/24/the-soviet-plan-for-ideological-subversion-describes-our-current-turmoil/


Below is one of the best articles relating to the present crisis I have seen. It is a must read! The author, a scientist, merges truth with common sense, and has the courage to print it. Please read it and pass it on.

The Biblical Solution to Racism

by Dr. Jason Lisle

It seems that there has been a resurgence of racism in the United States.  As Christians, we are very concerned about this because we believe that all people are made in the image of God and therefore deserve dignity, respect, and fair treatment regardless of ethnicity. The Bible condemns racism as sin, and therefore we must stand against it, and must warn people of organizations that promote what God forbids.

One organization that claims to promote racial equality is called “Black Lives Matter” (BLM). However, upon examining their claims, we will find that this organization is actually fueling racism rather than reducing it. We will find that BLM fights against biblical principles and is exacerbating the very condition it pretends to fight against.  Some Christians have been repeating the phrase “Black Lives Matter” perhaps without recognizing the anti-Christian nature of the organization, or without considering the potentially racist implications of the phrase itself.  So let’s investigate this movement, and see if we can find a biblical solution to racism.

The Anti-Biblical Philosophy of BLM

It is helpful to know something about the people who started the organization and their philosophies to see what is being promoted in the Black Lives Matter movement.  The movement was founded by three women: Patrisse Khan-Cullors, Alicia Garza, and Opal Tometi.  Patrisse Khan-Cullors is a lesbian and considers herself the wife of Harriet Tubman.  Likewise, Alicia Garza describes herself as “queer” and the wife Malachi Larrabee-Garza who is “transgender” (she is a woman who refers to herself with masculine pronouns).  Opal Tometi describes herself as “an ally to the trans and queer community.”[1]  She donates to trans-gender causes and organizations.

This is significant because the Bible describes the perversion of homosexual behavior as a particularly heinous sin – an abomination (Leviticus 18:22).  It takes something good that the Lord created for a husband and wife, and perverts it into a hateful statement of rebellion against God.  Romans 1:26-32 describes homosexual behavior as what happens when God abandons people to their depraved, rebellious, sinful core.  The chapter ends with a statement that seems strangely prophetic in light of current events: “and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.”  That is, those who hate God so much as to engage in sexual perversion also encourage others to do the same.  This is exactly…[Please continue reading this important article. Just click here.]

Dr. Lisle is an astrophysicist and a creationist. He writes and speaks for the Institute of Creation Research in Dallas, TX.


Anyone paying attention?

Do you think Apostolic ministers are aware of the BlackLivesMatter agenda, or who the founders are and what they believe? Perhaps most are, but apparently some are not aware of that movement’s objectives and the power they have amassed, since they have joined in their march and demonstration. The founders are Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi. According to all reports the women are lesbians (one is a transgender) who rail against “heteronormative thinking” and how it must change. Are they merely concerned with racial justice for people of color like George Floyd or does their agenda include the overturning of the entire American system? Take a few minutes, dear readers, and scroll through BlackLivesMatter.com and see for yourselves. Quite enlightening.

In an interview with a professor from Morgan State University, co-founder Patrisse Cullors said: “Myself and Alicia (Garza) in particular are trained organizers. We are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on ideological theories.” These women guide The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, which is the central organization that directs policy. Alicia Garza, 39, is the chief strategic advisor. Opal Tometi, works with the BLM Foundation and is also the Executive Director of the “Black Alliance for Just Immigration.” That group is associated with the “Freedom Road Socialist Organization,” a Marxist-Leninist group that has received funding from the Tides Foundation run by George Soros.    https://www.billoreilly.com/b/Bills-Column-on-the-BLM-Organization:-Its-News-to-Us/-20554200728065000.html?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=staff_columnh


“Teach these things…” (I Timothy 4:11; 6:2)

One of the best ways to defeat this communist monster gnawing at our nation’s vitals, is to preach and teach with more inspiration and spiritual authority than ever. Bible studies for all who are interested in being eternally saved. And then studies from Scripture on how to stay saved until Jesus comes. One of the best ways to do that is to employ the Into His Marvelous Light one hour Bible study, and its follow-up study, Guide for Living. Order your supply of these powerful soulwinning tools today!

Into His Marvelous Light one-hour Bible study is the easiest to use!

Only $1.75 each up to 49 copies, 1.50 each from 50-99 copies, and only 1.25 for orders IHML_GFL_Revisedof 100 or more. Follow-up study Guide For Living is same price.

Still the best soulwinning tool you can use!

Order online at www.advanceministries.org/ or phone 936-537-0250.



Better than words


The Last Word

For a start, while we are de-funding, let’s de-fund the tenure of radical professors and the thought police.

Have a productive and exciting JULY! Hopefully soon we will be able to return to more theological and inspirational topics.


Reminder: I do not speak for anyone but myself. The statements herein are mine alone or copy I have read and feel is worthy of passing along to my readers.

Published in: on July 1, 2020 at 12:00 AM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey Mid-month blog for June 2020

Welcome. Thanks for logging in.


The Word for Today

Hold on to the pattern of wholesome teaching you learned from me—a pattern shaped by the faith and love that you have in Christ Jesus. Through the power of the Holy Spirit who lives within us, carefully guard the precious truth that has been entrusted to you” (II Timothy 1:14 NLT).



More has been stolen in the last three weeks than TVs from Target, menswear from Macy’s, or sneakers from the burning Nike store—all witnessed on national media.

A thoughtless policeman stole any vestige of racial harmony that might have remained after the Ferguson, MO riots of a few years ago or the more recent jogger’s death in Georgia.

Talking heads in the media have purloined from our consciousness any hope of healing the political divide in our nation, at least for a long time to come. Recent events have dissolved any sense of safety we might have had to venture onto the streets in any large city.

The pride many Americans had in our nation, its flag, its history, or its symbols and monuments was filched in just a few days. The bronze Texas Ranger statue that graced the Love Field airport in Dallas has been dismantled and removed. Some felt it had to go since it represented law enforcement.

Stripped from us was the patriotism that could be publicly expressed about our flag and what it stands for. A sports icon who spoke up for it had to retract his statement and apologize to his teammates and the mobs in the streets for his misguidance.

Some citizens, particularly women who appeared to be alone, were accosted and made to kneel before a “protester” and apologize for the assumed privilege of the skin color of the majority of Americans. That is an act of blatant racism. True “privilege” might be seen in any city, county, or state government office or institution where one minority race generally dominates. Discipline or termination in those venues is virtually impossible without the threat of lawsuits for “discrimination” based on the term du jour—racism.

Ripped off was our confidence in assurances of protection and safety for all citizens as politicians cowardly praised those in the streets breaking windows to grab some desired item while police were initially told to stand back. When police were organized against the rioters, the mayor of our largest city was televised telling his daughter how proud he was of her that she had joined rioters in the streets throwing projectiles at cops, tossing Molotov cocktails into police cars, shooting and stabbing them in a blood-crazed frenzy. Anarchists cruelly beat a woman with fists and boards for simply asking the looters, “Please don’t do this!” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tEUmmYDUfA). Her begging for mercy fell on deaf ears. No one was listening since she didn’t have the right skin color. The mainstream media were evidently highly selective about which videos would be shared with the public.

Stolen are the minds and hearts of our children, dividing them from faithful parents and leaders, setting them at odds by having kids demand that parents profess solidarity with a certain radical political movement by marching with them or donating to their cause. Refusal draws accusations of racism for the parents and denunciations by their children. My own 10-year old great grandson told me as I pointed out national borders on a globe during a geography lesson, “I don’t believe in borders. We shouldn’t have them. Anyone should be free to come into the country.” His innocent mind is being hijacked by public school teachers who are themselves forced to parrot the leftist narrative.

They hear news media icons suggest that there is genocide of people of color going on by cops, although the data and statistics do not substantiate those claims. (Source: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/table-43 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n5_D59lSjc).

Does intentional police brutality occur? Raphael Mangual, a fellow of the Manhatten Institute, addresses that question. Yes, it has occurred, but statistically it is rare. So does spousal brutality and child abuse/brutality, both far more often than police brutality. The stress of modern life has caused “brutality” to become an all too common scene in this present world. However, Mangual points out that “only 0.03% of interactions with a cop result in use of deadly force.” And how many videos have you seen where cops were having to get tough with a rowdy, resisting white guy? Those rarely get shown. The data do not represent black genocide. But then, does anyone really care about facts? Truth is fallen in the streets.

So after all the thieving, looting and pillaging, what is left? Not much…beyond fear, division and now a hearty portion of self-loathing. Fear had already been instilled by the parodic covid-19, but now there is division among people who had been neighbors for years, telling on each other if social distancing isn’t being fully observed in some setting outside the home. One woman was thrown to the ground and cuffed because her mask was not fully in place on her face and resisted being hassled about it. As for self-loathing, it now seems to be a popular part of the national mindset of those with a light skin color. For an example, see the comments by the white wife of a star football player—“We [white people] are the problem.” Is that not a racist comment?

C’mon, folks. We need to step back from the fires and take a cool breath of sanity and common sense.

There is one hope for America and for your family and mine: the CHURCH, the imperfect people who still love everyone—even the looters and the liars—because they themselves have been loved by a Savior and redeemed by the blood of Christ. It is extremely important what we Christians tell our children about the events of the past few weeks, and how we tell them. Public schools and the social media they are plugged into daily feed them a warped, one-sided narrative that is pure poison in the soul of this nation. They don’t hold back, why should we?

Truth untold is worthless.

If you dare, check out the posts on this clip:



Whites are NOT the problem

Nor are blacks the problem. Or persons of any other skin color. Foolish remarks by the white wife of a sports icon only exacerbated the recent cultural clashes of the past few weeks. After her husband’s apology for standing up for the flag, she takes the apology a step further: “We [white people] are the problem.” What a racist statement to make in the context of an apology for being racist.

Let’s address the real problem. It is sin. Fornication produces single moms and fatherless homes, climbing to 75% in the black community. It is drug addiction—hard recreational drugs from marijuana to heroin, opiods, and psychiatric mind-altering drugs. It is alcoholism, a factor in tens of thousands of deaths every year. It is the violence that these major factors produce in users. It is cigarette smoking and tobacco use that take almost a half million American lives each year. It is the greed of big pharma. It is power-hungry politicians that sell themselves for campaign donations. It is the media, which would prefer to propagate a lie than the truth. In short, it is ungodliness. But the real problems have recently been hidden under the mask of “poor policing and rampant racism.”

To say America’s problem is people of a particular skin color is a confession of cluelessness, of blatant racism unmasked, of gross ignorance, and suggests groveling before the kings and queens of hypocrisy reigning in Hollywood and on the sports fields of the nation.

Did she think that would be a placating and healing remark? Would it bring understanding and togetherness? The fawning press couldn’t wait to publish her statement to add fuel to the fires burning down our cities during this the current crisis.


Here’s that breath of common sense sanity:

The Patrick Perspective

Imagine you marry your middle school sweetheart, have four children in that marriage and raise four boys in the Lord, attend church regularly, train our children in competition, teach them conservative values and work hard for them to attend Christian, private and public schools….

Only to have a large group of black people called #BlackLivesMatter in black culture call you an Uncle Tom and your family a failure because we refuse to identify with their culture of failure, refuse to kneel and disrespect a flag or support black group think or black idolatry. We are called whitewashed and sellouts for building a legacy of success.

This is what I mean by the black culture of failure and the black community being the only community that degrades itself at the expense of themselves. Their culture glorifies the criminal, the drug dealer, the hiphopper, the porn stars, the godless athlete, the anti-Christ movie star, the gay TV host, the looters, and the rioters.

No one is calling them to repentance. Everyone, even their pastors pander to their #MoralRot because it’s big business to allow their culture of failure to continue. From failing schools to failed marriages. Progressives and Liberals are making a lot of money off of their failing culture.

The black culture of failure despises anyone that actually believes in succeeding at the American dream. They despise a family that’s intact. Children that speak proper English. My family is by no means perfect. We fail at times but we take full responsibility for our failures. We also take advantage of the opportunities afforded to us that our ancestors dreamed of. We refuse to be bitter. We refuse to associate with dead end movements. Most of all we refuse to be bullied by #BlackLivesMatter to compromise our faith in Jesus Christ and embrace groupthink.

And now America is on its knees. Kneeling to look good on social media. Kneeling to protect businesses from getting firebombed. Kneeling to save white lives, families, and communities from being destroyed. Local police and even the National Guard are kneeling to hopefully stop the rioting so that some semblance of society will remain. We are kneeling in fear, giving control to something sinister that we do not understand.

We believe #AllLivesMatter. We believe #JesusMatters. We will only kneel to God and confess Jesus is Lord.


The Patrick Hamptons



Pastors’ Organization Calls Out U.S. Supreme Court Majority for “Legislating From the Bench” in LGBTQ Case

Houston, TX – U.S. Pastor Council, the inter-racial, inter-denominational organization of pastors whose Houston affiliate led the coalition to defeat an LGBTQIAP+ ordinance in Houston in 2015 which would have allowed biological males to use female’s private facilities among other grievances is “appalled” at today’s 6-3 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Bostock v. Clayton County the court redefining “sex” to include “sexual behavior.” The case involved the firing of several individuals allegedly because of their “sexual orientation” and in spite of the fact that Congress has never added those categories to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, six lawyers on the U.S. Supreme Court decided to do so.

“The claims of discrimination based on sexual behavior and now state of mind by the LGBTQIAP+ activists and that they have suffered the same such as Blacks in America has always been offensive and without merit,” said USPC in it’s statement. “The previous non-discrimination standards that required immutability, evidence of widespread and government induced denial of education and voting rights have been thrown out the window by these six activist judges,” they continued.

The pastors agreed with Justice Samuel Alito’s scathing dissent in which he states after pointing out that these provisions repeatedly failed to pass in Congress, Usurping the constitutional authority of the other branches, the Court has essentially taken H. R. 5’s provision on employment and issued it under the guise of statutory interpretation. A more brazen abuse of our authority to interpret statutes is hard to recall.”

According to the pastors, the ongoing clash between First Amendment rights of freedom of religious practice and expression and the ever-expanding scope of LGBTQIAP+ behavior categories has been dramatically elevated by this decision.  “Creating special rights based on unidentifiable and constantly changing behavior and mental illness such as gender dysphoria by this court must at some point reach a ‘final solution’ of exterminating religious freedom as the two are fundamentally incompatible,” the pastors stated.

They concluded by declaring “We will not remain silent while millions of Christians and other Americans of faith are criminalized and punished for the simple belief and practice of the faith and principles established by the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and written irrevocably in the Bible as well as in our hearts through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.”


Harry Potter author maligned

The social justice police are at it again. British author J.K. Rowling, known for writing the world famous Harry Potter books, triggered an avalanche of controversy over the weekend for affirming scientific views of gender and sex.

Although Rowling supports LGBT people, she said that maintaining the biological structure of gender and sex is vitally important—especially for LGBT people.

“If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction. If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It isn’t hate to speak the truth,” Rowling wrote. – The Blaze

Sorry, J.K., but some folks just can’t be placated.


This is the time to renew your supply of Bible studies

Into His Marvelous Light Bible Study

IHMLCoverNo other brief, one session Bible study has enjoyed the consistent soul-winning results of IHML over the years. Often copied but never duplicated. It is attractive, well written, and doctrinally sound. It will convince any open-minded person (and some whose minds are not so open) that the new birth is absolutely essential and that Acts 2:38 constitutes that experience. It’s possible that more souls have been won with this Bible Study than with any other single teaching tool in the past 20 years. Discover how easy it is to share the plan of salvation with others. Available in English, Spanish and Italian. English is available in both KJV and NIV84.

AM Price 1-49 $1.75 each;  50-99 $1.50 each; 100 or more $1.25 each

Guide For LivingIHML_GFL_Revised

A follow-up study for the new believers and a sequel to IHML. This little booklet can be given to the new members to go through alone and then come back to you with any questions they may have. It can also be taught as a text in a class. It covers the new birth—what has happened to them experientially, and goes through what their responsibilities as believers are now.

AM Price 1-49 $1.75 each;  50-99 $1.50 each; 100 or more $1.25 each

Order books and Bible studies from advanceministries.org/store or call 936-537-0250.

See more publications at advanceministries.org/store


Like it is…


Last Words

Why do we need a vaccination for a virus when 99% recover with their own immune systems?

Are we being quarantined until there are no more germs in the world or until the election is over?

“Without liberty, law loses its nature and its name, and becomes oppression. Without law, liberty also loses its nature and its name, and becomes licentiousness.” —James Wilson (1790)


Published in: on June 17, 2020 at 9:17 AM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey blog for June 2020

Welcome to the JREnsey June 2020 blog. May common sense and moderation prevail!


The Word for Today

When the godly are in authority, the people rejoice. But when the wicked are in power, they groan” (Proverbs 29:2 NLT).

[Comment: Thinking from the standpoint of the time in which this proverb was written, it would seem that more meaning and relevance is gleaned from the passage when we consider it as a ruler doing the right thing for his people rather than focusing on possible personal peccadillos of the leader in question. Americans do not live in a religious theocracy as they did under Solomon, the writer of the proverb. And really, if we judge kings and rulers of secular nations by a strict biblical standard of personal deportment, how many of Israel’s kings could be counted among “the godly”? Check those whose record was that they “did that which was right in the sight of the Lord” but had a legacy soiled by one or more personal failures. The author’s life itself was a laundry list of bad personal choices, including outright sin. However, his kingly record was that he provided not only national prosperity but a time of peace and quietness (I Chronicles 22:9), which is what Christians are told to pray for (I Timothy 2:2). Mr. President, honorable congressmen—do the right thing. Follow the Constitution.]


Billionaire Bill Gates has plans for you

Gates, one of the world’s movers and shakers, is shown in this picture with a stack of books, apparently selections he is reading and promoting. The one on top is titled, How to Lie with Statistics. Is this the reason he and other one-worlders are so effective in shutting down the world to install “the new normal”? The Covid-19 numbers are being padded to force America and other nations to accept his vaccination plan. Other titles in the stack: Hyperbole and a Half, On Immunity, Should We Eat Meat, and The Magic of Reality. Some think part of the lockdown effort is to diminish or eliminate the consumption of meat, which sustains beef production, which in turn means more animal flatulence that is contributing to climate change.

Netflix has a show (I haven’t seen it, not subscribing to that medium) called Explained, which focuses on various subjects. One is titled The Next Pandemic, Season 2 Episode 7, 21 minutes, released November 7, 2019. Someone I know signed up for a free 30-day trial to watch. Gates paints a bleak picture of a pandemic killing millions. He also has a 30 million plus death simulation that he’s been using since 2018. Watch it—it is only 15 seconds. Starts in China, of course. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9afTl9z5JHQ&feature=emb_logo

In The Next Pandemic, which is now in progress, Gates said it’ll be like history’s “gigantic wars.” And he clearly predicted, “The economy will shut down” (said at 2 minute mark). We keep running into these pre-2020 references about shutting down the economy. It was in the plan all along. After this singular video, he followed with a six episode Netflix series entitled, The Next Pandemic: How to Prevent An Outbreak, completed in November 2019 and released on Netflix January 22, 2020.

Gates Foundation funds failed model makers. One of these, the IHME, is at the Universiy of Washington in Seattle, Bill Gates’ hometown:


[Can anyone guess where the first recorded case of Covid-19 appeared in the U.S.? You guessed it—not far from Billionaire Bill’s’ mansion in the Seattle area. What a “coincidence.”]


The killer in the shadows

The CDC Revises Covid-19 Numbers—Again

Thomas Gallatin

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has revised its [Covid-19 virus] numbers yet again, with its current and now “best estimate” for the COVID-19 fatality rate among infected people down to 0.3%—far lower than initial projections that spurred shutdowns nationwide. In fact, the CDC estimates that 35% of individuals infected with COVID-19 never experience symptoms, which means that the total rate of infection is 50% higher than the number of symptomatic cases. This would once again indicate that the virus is much more widespread than previously assumed.

These latest numbers from the CDC appear to support the findings of Thomas A.J. Meunier, a researcher from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. In a recent article published in the medical journal The Lancet, Meunier concluded that the “full lockdown policies in Western Europe countries have no evident impacts on the COVID-19 epidemic.” Meunier argued, “I expect that when we count the number of deaths from COVID-19 in each country in one year from now, the figures will be similar, regardless of measures taken.” Sweden’s former lead epidemiologist, Johan Giesecke, concurred, arguing that lockdowns ultimately don’t prevent deaths; they simply push them a bit further into the future.

Meanwhile, an early advocate of total lockdown, Dr. Anthony Fauci, warned on Friday, “We can’t stay locked down for such a considerable period of time that you might do irreparable damage and have unintended consequences, including consequences for health.” He added, “I don’t want people to think that any of us feel that staying locked down for a prolonged period of time is the way to go.” – Patriot Post 5/26/20

[Are our state officials listening? -ed.]


Doctors call for end to shutdown

Dr. Fauci’s recent comments (see above) come on the heels of last week’s letter to the White House from more than 600 doctors calling for an end to the “national shutdown” over growing concerns of a coming “mass casualty incident.” The letter warns, “Millions of casualties of a continued shutdown will be hiding in plain sight, but they will be called alcoholism, homelessness, suicide, heart attack, stroke, or kidney failure. In youth it will be called financial instability, unemployment, despair, drug addiction, unplanned pregnancies, poverty, and abuse.”

Evidence seemingly supporting the letter’s dire claims comes from John Muir Medical Center, a hospital located outside of San Fransisco, which reported more suicides this past month than deaths from COVID-19. Dr. Mike deBoisblanc, head of the emergency department, observed, “We’ve never seen numbers like this in such a short period of time. I mean we’ve seen a year’s worth of suicide attempts in the last four weeks.” A trauma nurse stated, “What I have seen recently, I have never seen before. I have never seen so much intentional injury. They intend to die.”

Given that the fatality rate is far lower than expected, while deaths of despair are rising, inquiring minds want to know: Was this whole lockdown worth it? – Thomas Gallatin, Patriot Post 5/26/20

[One wonders how many deaths and other tragedies with long-term family and societal effects could actually be traced to the lockdown. Overall, has the supposed remedial/avoidance measures been worse than the virus itself? That question does not ignore the awful pain and loss experienced by families who lost loved ones during this crisis. Some were personal aquaintances of mine. Our heart is broken for their families. It is also moved for those spiritually weak ones who won’t survive this lockdown, and the others who would have been converted during this period but were missed. We must not forget them—the casualties of the killer in the shadows.]


In case you missed these reports

Taiwan did not shut down

A neighbor nation to China with a population of 24 million did not shut down their thriving economy, even though they have as many as 400,000 who work in China. They have had 441 cases and 7 deaths. I wonder what would have been the casualty numbers had they shutdown?


Can you count the times in recent speeches the Chicago Mayor refers to New World Order?

Leftist and socialists want to see global governance arise out of this pandemic. Here is one episode stating that she expects government agencies and employees to “pledge allegiance to good governance and to the New World Order.” “Good governance” are said to be U.N. totalitarian code words.


Get ready to hear this kind of talk from officials in the future. Here’s a scary one for Chicago residents who can’t leave home without threat of arrest and jail:

Colorado admits 24% overcount in Covid deaths

The number of coronavirus deaths in state figures topped 1,000 about three weeks ago, but officials with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment revealed during a call with reporters that that number does not really represent the number of people who have died due to COVID-19. They admit to at least a 24% overcount. It seems that anyone who dies these days, they want to tag them as C-19 “related.”     https://www.gopusa.com/colorados-health-department-admits-24-overcount-in-coronavirus-deaths/

The truth seems to be that whatever figure is posted by the CDC or WHO is an inflated number. To power hungry politicians, higher numbers justify police state tactics.

Cuomo vs. Trump

NY Governor Cuomo said that the last places permitted to reopen will be the churches. The President had other ideas. He said, “Open them now…this weekend (May 24). They are essential.” Kudos for him! In his heart, he knows the truth about this whole pandemic. Perhaps he now wishes he had not listened to those who wanted to shut the nation down.

Watch Trump’s announcement here: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-announces-that-houses-of-worship-are-essential-calls-on-governors-to-open-them-up


The U.N. wants you to shut up and get off the Net

The current UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterrres of Portugal, goes public with his appeal for censorship of free speech, saying the Internet is filled with “misinformation” about the current pandemic crisis. He wants everyone to parrot the “scientists” (theirs, of course) and globalists or get off the Net and get in line for a vaccine, which some think could be available after Christmas. “Trust” them, he pleads. The social media giants should unilaterally remove all the misinformation from the Net so he can “flood the social media with facts.” You can always trust the U.N. to come up with the facts! (tic)

Listen to his appeal here:


They keep saying they want a cure for Covid-19 before opening the economy. Let’s see…do they have a cure for the common cold yet? And just where is most of the misinformation about this virus coming from? (CDC and WHO!) And why are the two political parties at such distance apart on this shutdown if politics is not a factor? Wake up, people!


A pastor spills the beans

This pastor has his facts on this pandemic as straight as anyone you will hear. It is a common sense assessment of what is really going on. Watch it before it is removed.



Shut down for the real killers, if shut down we must

One wonders if they are truly concerned with the nation’s health and safety, then why not ban tobacco? Cigarette smoking is responsible for more than 480,000 deaths per year in the United States, including more than 41,000 deaths resulting from secondhand smoke exposure. This is about one in five deaths annually, or 1,300 deaths every day.

An estimated 88,000 people die from alcoholrelated causes annually, making alcohol the third leading preventable cause of death in the United States. The first is tobacco, and the second is poor diet and physical inactivity. Those figures are annual, not once in decade or so.

If the country was shut down and the churches closed because of a flu-like epidemic that killed only a small percentage of what tobacco does, why don’t they close it down until folks stop smoking, chewing and drinking? Of course, we all know in our hearts why they do not. It is not so much about people dying but about money, power and control.


Oh, deer…what’s next?

On a recent episode of Amazon’s Twitch media outlet, a transgender was featured who identifies as a deer and who openly threatened to come against and ban any Twitch users who hold less “diverse” opinions. So much for tolerance.

“I have power, they can’t take it away from me,” bragged Steph Loehr, also known as FerociouslySteph, who was once a male, now a female (a doe with pink and blue horns?). “And honestly there are some people that should be afraid of me, and they are because I represent moderation and diversity and I’m gonna come for harmful people. If you’re a really s****y person—I’m gonna stand up against you. Period. And Twitch is endorsing me to do that.”

Galloway: “Flagan, are you scared?”

A video was shown of Loehr explaining how she likes to “prance around and eat grass,” and have a “deergasm” while getting a head-rub (all this is demonstrated in the video). Such are the wonderful, wholesome folks who leftists are allowing to censor free speech on the Internet. If we don’t make our voices heard now in Washington, such people will be pressing legislators to pass laws to protect and promote their activities. What about protecting sane folks? Sound advice: Drop Twitch and any other social media platforms that censor conservative speech. Parents, do you know what your teens are watching?

Shades of Nebuchadnezzar!




Molech appears at Vatican-owned Colosseum

The Colosseum in Rome is the most visited tourist attraction in the world. Now a giant statue of the pagan god Molech (sometimes spelled Moloch) has been erected there. Since the Vatican owns the structure, they evidently approved its placement. The strange becomes more strange every day. In the Bible, the god Molech is associated with the sacrifice of children.


Get your Bible studies here and save!

Into His Marvelous Light Bible Study

IHMLCoverNo other brief, one session Bible study has enjoyed the consistent soul-winning results of IHML over the years. Often copied but never duplicated. It is attractive, well written, and doctrinally sound. It will convince any open-minded person (and some whose minds are not so open) that the new birth is absolutely essential and that Acts 2:38 constitutes that experience. It’s possible that more souls have been won with this Bible Study than with any other single teaching tool in the past 20 years. Discover how easy it is to share the plan of salvation with others. Available in English, Spanish and Italian. English is available in both KJV and NIV84.

AM Price 1-49 $1.75 each;  50-99 $1.50 each; 100 or more $1.25 each

Guide For LivingIHML_GFL_Revised

A follow-up study for the new believers and a sequel to IHML. This little booklet can be given to the new members to go through alone and then come back to you with any questions they may have. It can also be taught as a text in a class. It covers the new birth—what has happened to them experientially, and goes through what their responsibilities as believers are now.

AM Price 1-49 $1.75 each;  50-99 $1.50 each; 100 or more $1.25 each

Order books and Bible studies from advanceministries.org/store or call 936-537-0250.

See more publications at advanceministries.org/store


Personalities on parade

Trey Gowdy at six months:


Dr. Fauci at 2 months: “Chairman Xi Jinping, I have been thinking about a way we can scare the pants off of Americans and disrupt their economy in 2020.”


Donald Trump at seven months:


Adam Schiff at age 59:


Crowned too early: Hillary at 4 months


Bill Gates at six months: “You will accept my tattoo vaccine or you will be quarantined until you do.”


Chuck Norris at three days: “Hang on, folks! I’ll kick some sense into their heads!”

Since tens of thousands are dying from auto accidents every year, Pelosi and Schumer say we must revert to a safer way (below) to get around. Latest model comes with umbrella. Watch your step.

As the world turns learns…


The Last Words

  • If you can’t trust your state to correctly count the number of Covid-19 deaths, how can you trust them to correctly count mail-in votes?
  • Question for Hillary: If you are chosen as Biden’s VP and he wins, what would be the first thing you would work on? Hillary: “His obituary.”

The prayer of an old sea Captain

Disturb us, Lord, when we are too well pleased with ourselves, when our dreams come true because we have dreamed too little, when we arrived safely because we sailed too close to harbor.

Disturb us, Lord, when with the abundance of things we possess, we have lost our thirst for the waters of life; having fallen in love with life, we have ceased to dream of eternity, and in our efforts to build a new earth, we have allowed our vision of the new heaven to dim.

Disturb us, Lord, to dare more boldly, to venture on wider seas, where storms will show your mastery; where losing sight of land, we shall find the stars. We ask you to push back the horizon of our hopes; and to push back the future in strength, courage, hope, and love.

This we ask in the name of our Captain, who is Jesus Christ.



Have a safe and blessed month!


PS: I have contacted my Congressman about issues that concern me. I trust you have connected with yours. And thanks for changing my email address in your contact lists to jrensey1@gmail.com.

Published in: on June 1, 2020 at 1:20 AM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey mid-May 2020 blog

Welcome to this extra mid-May blog. Check out Just A Rehearsal? Is Covid-19 restrictions about our health only or is it a rehearsal for future “lockdowns”?


The Word for Today

“I urge you, first of all, to pray for all people. Ask God to help them; intercede on their behalf, and give thanks for them. Pray this way for kings and all who are in authority so that we can live peaceful and quiet lives marked by godliness and dignity. This is good and pleases God our Savior” (1 Timothy 2:1-3 NLT).


Words of wisdom

If you won’t take credit for what God does, you won’t have to take the blame for what He doesn’t do. – Paul Price

When the state puts you in jail for walking in the park with your child because it is too dangerous, but lets criminals out of jail, it is not about your health. – Kevin Sorbo


Isn’t it funny…

…how we need to “release people from jail ‘so they won’t get Covid’ applies to rapists and pedophiles but not to hair stylists?” – Allie Beth Stuckey

…how, if YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook are deferring to the WHO, and WHO is deferring to China, then social media companies are de facto being censored by China? – PatriotPost

…that the only way the Covid virus will die is if it has dirt on the Clintons? – Ibid.

…how going to a crowded Krogers or Walmart or Home Depot is safe, but going to an ocean beach, even an unpopulated one, is unsafe?

…how some politicians go entirely deaf to charges of sexual harassment when it involves someone in their party?

…how, in two years, the term “Believe All Women” has morphed into “believe all Democrats”?

…that some people still believe everything their government tells them?


Just A Rehearsal?

“Lock ’em up!”

That recent official order did not relate to the Clintons or a lying former FBI Director but to the nation’s churches.

In 1 Timothy 2:1-3, the Apostle Paul issued instructions for Christians to pray for those in political authority and positions of power. Back then they were dealing with the mighty Roman Empire at large and the law-bound Hebrew nation up close during Paul’s lifetime. He urged prayer for them in spite of their hate and persecution and gross hypocrisy.

Perhaps it was no easier for Paul to know how to pray for Roman rulers than it is for you and me to pray for presidents and congressmen, especially when you see abuses of power that are sowing the seeds of totalitarianism in our nation. Actor Kevin Sorbo has accurately discerned, “When the state puts you in jail for walking in the park with your child because it is too dangerous, but lets criminals out of jail, it is not about your health.” It is about power and control. And when they let you go out for groceries and hardware but then they insist on a “mail-in vote,” you can be certain that they are not concerned about keeping you safe from a virus. When liquor stores are considered “essential” entities to be kept open but churches must be locked, something is wrong with this picture.

That being said, we must never stop interceding for those in authority, and especially for those who seem to want to do the right thing. I must admit that prayer for tyrannical kings and puny potentates is more difficult than ever—although more needed than ever.

Government corruption is now touching each of us, and our families and homes. It is not just off out yonder in far away Washington somewhere, but now all around us. We are presently in a test to see how far citizens will allow government to go in controlling their lives. This present scenario was organized last year, and much of it planned years ago (see links below) before you and I had heard of coronavirus. How to take control of the masses, masked as a pandemic, was discussed and outlined

Make no mistake, this present virus is real, and it is aiding in the death of a lot of people, some of whom I have known personally, and much of what we are doing to curb the spread of it is wise. We have nearly a dozen health care workers in our church battling this pandemic—heroes every one. But did it merit shutting down the country? We have had similar viruses and flu pandemics and other pestilences loosed upon us (virtually all from Asia, particularly China) that killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, yet former administrations did not shut the country down.

Yes, we have lost thousands of citizens, mostly older ones, with complications traceable to Covid. We have also lost millions of jobs, many of which will never come back. Poverty is now or soon will be staring many in the face. Dependence on government checks—a goal of socialists—is more common than ever in our lifetime. Suicides have escalated, as have divorces. Confusion reigns. We want a stable government run by honest and fair-minded individuals. For that we are told to pray: “..that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.

In 1918, we were fighting a war in Europe when the flu struck and took the lives of 675,000 people in the U.S. There was no shutdown of the economy and the closing of churches. In 1957, the Asian flu killed 116,000 Americans when the population was only 177 million. To extrapolate that out, we would be seeing many hundreds of thousands of deaths, perhaps over a million with Covid. I had the Asian flu (it targeted younger people) in 1957 and it put me and many others on our backs. However, there was no hysteria, no shutdown, schools and businesses remained open, sports continued, the economy was not totally wrecked, the stock markets didn’t crash, Congress didn’t pass politically-motivated legislation, and the hospitals and health industry handled the pandemic.

The Hong Kong flu of 1968-69 killed another 33,000 but no shutdown of the country occurred. Folks figured disease was more of medical problem than one calling for a political solution. Right now the effort is on to unseat a president. That understanding does not diminish the pain of loss in those families touched by Covid. Our hearts go out to them.

The former Coronavirus (SARS) in 2003 took its toll. In 2009 the Swine Flu (H1N1) killed thousands and there was no shut down. The current virus targets older people who are more likely to vote for a more conservative government. I’m not saying that was by design, although it could have been. Why would we ever trust the Chinese communists and those who bow to them to do the right thing regarding America?

Another nation, like China, can do this anytime they want to. It’s called biological warfare. They know they cannot whip this nation in a war, but they want to do it without firing a missile. What we are presently seeing is a propagation of fear that is being used to diminish the will of the nation. Death numbers of Covid are being purposely skewed (we all know this) to produce more fear and collect more money for hospitals or political entities. With each passing day, America faces new cases of pathological lying from the political establishment. Even Dr. Birx of the President’s Coronavirus task force, reported death tolls from the virus are overstated by as much as 25%. In an extremely blunt criticism of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) where the numbers originate, Dr. Birx stated, “There is nothing from the CDC that I can trust.” Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, himself a medical doctor, spoke out against the perceived wisdom of globalist Dr. Fauci, noting that his pandemic response has been marred by “wrong prediction after wrong prediction.” For answers to many questions, follow the money—and the politics.

With Dr. Fauci, the WHO and CDC calling the shots, the nation was shut down. Fauci now says schools may not open in the fall. Gates wants compulsory vaccine for everyone. They are saying it will probably not be available until January. Will it come to be vaccinated or else? He has even offered $10 million to Nigeria if the leaders will bypass elected government bodies and impose mandatory vaccine for all. And who could you trust with your freedoms more than globalists like Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates and George Soros? They are on a par with the guy on Times Square in NYC selling an armful of “Rolox” watches, or Adam Schiff informing us of the truth about governmental oversight.

It is fairly obvious that one of the objectives was to bring down the greatest economy that the world has known, and with it the current presidency. That seems to be common knowledge. There are no secrets anymore. Leftist governors are not planning on opening up sports events in the fall. Why is that blue state officials want to keep the economy on lockdown? HUD Secretary Dr. Ben Carson said on May 9, The economic crisis we are experiencing right now is intentional. They are jailing people like the salon owner in Dallas for opening up a little early so employees could buy groceries and feed their families while turning convicted prisoners loose! The NYC mayor has banned constitutionally protected protests of any kind. An array of NYC cops threw a woman, accompanied by her small child, to the ground and handcuffed her because their masks were not covering her faces. Is the management of this pandemic just a rehearsal for future impositions? Nothing appears more certain.

Getting people to tattle on each other, or reporting stores that may violate a spatial requirement or a 25% customer rule—that is the kind of thing they promote in Communist countries. Our police departments have been busy on calls about such reported “violations.” Mark Cuban, the billionaire owner of a basketball franchise in Dallas, admitted to sending spies into stores to see if they were enforcing the 6-foot rule of social distancing. Drones are being used to spy on potential violators. We are being conditioned to accept total top down control secured by the socialists’ methods of monitoring the populace.

Be cautious, listen carefully to your pastor, obey the guidelines of your church. Dump fear. Keep the right attitude. Wrong and divisive spirits can find a way into a congregation impacted by the present crisis. Be aware. Be humble. Be informed. And most of all, be prayerful. “For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour (1 Timothy 2:3).


[The above is a compilation of personal experiences and observations, along with information gleaned from government sites and other public sources that anyone can find with minimal research.]

The following sites will give you a grisly view of our present and future pandemics and how they are/will be managed to install top down control of the masses. Dr. Fauci and the globalists and communists have been hard at work for years to achieve this ultimate goal of personal and economic control.






Time to stock up on IHML Bible studies

No other one-hour Bible study has enjoyed the consistent results of IHML over the years. Often copied but never duplicated. It is attractive, well written, and doctrinally sound. It will convince any open-minded person (and some whose minds are not so open) that the new birth is absolutely essential and that Acts 2:38 constitutes that experience. It’s possible that more souls have been won with this Bible Study than with any other single evangelism tool in the past 30 years. Discover how easy it is to share the plan of salvation with others. Available in both English and Spanish. English is available in both KJV and NIV.

AM Price 1-49 $1.75 each;  50-99 $1.50 each; 100 or more $1.25 each.

Help establish them with this:

Guide For LivingIHML_GFL_Revised

A follow-up study for the new convert. This little booklet may be given to the new convert to go through alone, filling in the blanks, and then bring back to you with any questions they may have. It covers the new birth—what has happened to them experientially—and walks them through what their responsibilities as new believers are now.

AM Price 1-49 $1.75 each;  50-99 $1.50 each; 100 or more $1.25 each.

 Order at advanceministries.org/store or call 936-537-0250.


From Asia with love—Flu, Covid, murder hornets…what’s next? Flying sharks?


The Last Words

I think all the world would gain by setting commerce at perfect liberty.”  —Thomas Jefferson (1785)

And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh” (Luke 21:28).


Published in: on May 14, 2020 at 10:26 PM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey blog for May 2020

Welcome to the JREnsey MAY 2020 blog. Get a cup and spend a few minutes with Star Parker, Abraham Lincoln, Dr. Benjamin Rush, the apostle Paul, Jesus, and me.


The Word for Today

“So do not throw away this confident trust in the Lord. Remember the great reward it brings you! 36 Patient endurance is what you need now, so that you will continue to do God’s will. Then you will receive all that he has promised. 37 For in just a little while, the Coming One will come and not delay. 38 And my righteous ones will live by faith. But I will take no pleasure in anyone who turns away” (Hebrews 10:35-39 NLT).


For the times

Make sure you test positive for the faith. Keep a safe distance from doubt. Isolate unbelief. Know the objectives of the voices to which you listen.

Can you trust the UN/WHO doctors regarding covid-19? An interesting report that we found helpful can be accessed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_EwxG8YZ50

Just before publication of this blog, they removed the doctors testimony from the Internet. It didn’t accommodate the official narrative; rather it was more of an exposé. However, the doctors were interviewed on Fox News by Laura Ingraham. The YouTube editors must have received so much flak from the public that they restored it. With all the info flowing to us, much of which is conflicting, we are required to sift through it to find the truth. Wisdom seems to dictate to err on the side of caution, and to be as safe as possible even as we return to gathering at church. Merging official directives, prayer and common sense should bring us to the best choices as we deal with this health crisis.


Virus never stops revival

What has been exciting is that some folks who weren’t really into outreach and evangelism have gotten involved. The results are amazing. As we were preparing for a recorded service one day, one of our newest converts brought a couple to the church to be baptized. He had given them a Bible study and they were ready to obey the gospel. As soon as they were baptized, another call came that a lady who was suffering from cancer wanted to be baptized. As the name of Jesus was called over these folks, we realized how ingathering can continue even when we are not allowed to have church as usual.

This health crisis has motivated both Christians and non-Christians people to do some self-evaluation on their own. And if we can keep the message of salvation flowing out from church services, home Bible studies, and personal witnessing, God will continue to give the increase.


Maybe it is time to laugh a little


Jesus and the Father

“I and my Father are one…he that hath seen me hath seen the Father” (John 10:30; 14:9).

Although Trinitarians sometimes mock Oneness believers, claiming that we think Jesus is His own Father, we would never put it just like that. But we are not afraid to say what the Scriptures say—they are “one.”

Trinitarians jump through semantical hoops to attempt to explain Jesus’ statements by saying they are one like a husband and wife are one (Genesis 2:24). However, what man would say, “When you have seen me, you have seen my wife”?

How can Jesus be both the Father and the Son? From a Trinitarian standpoint, it is incomprehensible. In human reasoning it is a legitimate question. The Scriptures hold the answer.

In Isaiah 9:6 we are told of a Son and a Father who were the same entity: “[A] son is given…his name shall be called…the everlasting Father.” The BIble never speaks of God as “they…them…themselves,” as though God was a plurality of divine beings. God always represented Himself as one: “Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one” (Deuteronomy 6:4).

In biblical jargon, Jesus can be both the Father and the Son just as He can be both the root and the offspring of David (Revelation 22:16), and both the Creator and the creature (Colossians 1:15,16), both the purchaser and the price of redemption (Acts 20:28; Matthew 27:9; I Corinthians 6:20),  both the High Priest and the sacrifice (Hebrews 2:17; 9:26), both the Lion and the Lamb (Revelation 5:5; John 1:29), both the Shepherd and the door of the sheepfold (John 10:11; 10:7), both the first and the last (Revelation 1:8), and both the beginning and the end (Revelation 21:6).

Believers in the Oneness of God do not fear to exegetically dissect any verse in the Bible. Trinitarians, believers in multiple persons in the Godhead, are forced to read the Scriptures eisegetically, injecting into them their own presuppositions and biased theology.

The Scriptures reveal a unique relationship of God and Christ (deity and man; divine Spirit and human flesh) for which the world has no analogy, no real comparisons, no similies that fit. Jesus Christ was more than just a man, more than just a Nazarene carpenter’s son, a maker of tabletops and wagonwheels—He was God showing Himself to men in flesh (I Timothy 3:16).

As we have heard Clifford Readout, Jr. say so eloquently, “Jesus was the translation of God to men by the Son of God.” God was Spirit, man was flesh, so there had to be a translator, a mediator who spoke both “languages.” Jesus was God translating Himself for men, a self-disclosure of the Infinite by the finite, a rendering of the eternal Spirit by mortal flesh, a revealing of deity by blood and bones. He represented God to men and men to God (I Timothy 2:5). Jesus of the New Testament revealed the God of the Old Testament.

We can understand and relate to Jesus because He was one of us. The disciples knew Him, touched Him, handled Him, John said, calling Him the very “word of life” (I John 1:1). God came as the man Jesus Christ to speak to men at their level, manifesting the wisdom and power of God (I Corinthians 1:24). In this He did not fail, as Isaiah had so accurately predicted long ago (Isaiah 42:3,4).

Jesus was not just a man with a message, He was God’s message wrapped up in a man (John 1:1)! He was the eternal Word pushed through the birth canal of human experience, the visible form of the one invisible God (John 12:45). Who but Jesus could say, “I came but I was already here…I am going away but I will never leave you?”  (John 8:56-58; John 16:7; Matthew 28:20). What a wonder He is!

Trinitarianism is men defining God in pagan terms but Jesus Christ is God defining Himself. The term “eternal Son of God” is a Trinitarian invention not found in Scripture. Jesus Himself is the final authority on who and what God is.

“Let God be true, but every man a liar” (Romans 3:4).


A Defense of the Use of the Bible in Schools

By Dr. Benjamin Rush (1745-1813), distinguished physician and signer of the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

Dr. Benjamin Rush was an outspoken Christian, statesman, and pioneering medical doctor. He was a prolific author, publishing the first American chemistry textbook. In 1797, President John Adams appointed Rush as Treasurer of the U.S. Mint, a position he held until 1813. He also founded America’s first Bible society. At the time of his death in 1813, he was heralded as one of the three most notable figures of America, the other two being George Washington and Benjamin Franklin.

This booklet, published in the late 1700s, was an appeal to keep the Bible as a primary textbook. Below is a link to the article, which I trust you will read and pass along to your friends, especially to all of the teachers in your church. It is unnerving to see how far America has drifted from the ideals of the founders. Can the sharp left turns be steered back toward a more sensible approach—regarding education in particular? It depends on US! Every pastor and parent would do their family a favor by reading and taking to heart the message of Dr. Rush. Click on the link below and read the article, then pass it on.



Harvard professor wants to ban homeschooling because it’s “authoritarian

She wants the government to have authority over your children, not you. This is the kind of clap-trap that is banded about in college publications and classrooms today. Read about it here:


I would be comfortable saying that any 10 randomly chosen homeschoolers could beat any 10 randomly chosen public school kids in a test on basic subjects.


Who is surprised?

Authorities arrested an 18-year-old student at Rhinelander High School in Rhinelander, Wisconsin, after the student allegedly sexually assaulted one of his fellow students. A spokesperson for the Oneida County Sheriff’s Office said the incident took place in the school’s gender-neutral restroom. The school had refurbished a former men’s restroom and turned it into a gender-neutral space in order to make comfortable the students who were transgender or “gender expansive.”

The school has now closed the restroom to its student population.

School administrators just don’t seem to get it. Falling all over themselves to accommodate the LGBTQCORECTUMSHYLAG movement is never going to overcome human tendency toward such occurrences. And whatever they do will never be enough to make that movement “comfortable.” They will never be satisfied. Wake up.


Hypocrisy on parade

The Democrat governor of Connecticut expressed “heartbroken sadness” that a six-week old baby was brought to a local hospital unresponsive and could not be revived. He claimed the child was the youngest fatality to covid-19 “anywhere.” Mothers went berserk at the news that their babies could die from this virus. When the truth came out, the baby died from an incident in the home. Covid-19 did not kill the baby. But the crocodile tears and “heartbroken sadness” were hypocritical and politically evoked. As a “pro-choice” advocate, just six weeks ago he would have approved the mother’s right to kill the baby, using a Planned Parenthood doctor as the “hit man.”

Follow the money…and the politics! One of our relative’s relative by marriage, an elderly person, recently died from a stroke. The hospital told the family that they would be putting on the death certificate that she died of Covid-19. They knew it was a source of funds from the Fed’s “stash.” The family said, “Absolutely not. She died of a stroke.” One wonders just how much “doctoring” of the reports is really going on.


Is anyone watching and listening?

“The American people will eventually fly the Communist Red flag…the American people will hoist it themselves.” – Former Russian Premier Nikita Khrushchev

A variety of leftist groups use radical environmentalism as ideological packaging to carry out street actions advocating revolution. For example, if the United States has a “People’s Climate Movement,” you should know that it is a product of the communist-led parties. In the United States, the organizations involved are the Communist Party USA, Socialism in Action, the Maoist American Revolutionary Communist Party, Ecological Society, Socialist Workers, Alternative Socialism, American Democratic Socialism, Free Socialism, and others. They hosted the People’s Climate Rally and the People’s Climate Parade. Slogans at these rallies have included “System change, not climate change,” “Capitalism is killing us,” “Capitalism is destroying the environment…Capitalism is killing the planet,” and “Fight for a socialist future.”

These groups, with a sea of red flags, have marched in many major cities in the United States, including Washington. With more and more communist and socialist elements to strengthen environmentalism, “green peace” has made a full transition to red revolution.

In 2006 a British diplomat said in a public speech that those who doubt climate change should be treated by the media no differently than terrorists, and that they should not be given a platform to speak. (Wkl)

Restricting the right to think and express those thoughts is one of the ways communism divorces people from a concept of good and evil based on universal values. As long as we let them teach socialism and anti-American garbage in our schools, we will be pushed toward fulfillment of Khruschev’s prophecy.

Note: The Hollywood actor who recently cried, “Capitalism is killing us!” has no concept of reality or history. Capitalism has grown a country from nothing to be the greatest nation in history. It has granted its citizens the freedom to develop the highest standard of living on the planet, and given idiots like him an opportunity to speak their mind, regardless how shallow and uninformed he may be. Remember: Hate speech is just free speech that Leftists don’t like.


A Message to Immigrants

If you want to immigrate or have immigrated from another country to America, you know you can—our laws permit it. If you come because you want to share in the relative prosperity of our people, if you yearn for the freedom our citizens enjoy, and if you are willing to be assimilated into the culture of American freedom—welcome! Our arms are open to you, regardless of your race, ethnicity, skin color or religion.

You may continue to hold the personal values that you held in the country of your origin as long as they do not conflict with U.S. laws or infringe upon the traditions our citizens cherish and revere. Most Americans are Christians and embrace the Judeo-Christian ethic, as it is known, but you may worship whom or what you please; that is, as long it does not encourage the violation of our laws or tends to deny present citizens the right to continue to worship and practice religion as we have since the founding of our nation.

If you want to come here because you do not like the oppressive government of your homeland, we understand, but do not come with the aim of changing ours to accommodate your personal preferences. Do not attempt to force Americans to acquiesce to your ways by altering ours. Do not hope to take apart what our founding fathers put together by grit and grace and personal sacrifice. We want to continue to sing our songs, recite our pledges, raise our monuments, and uphold our values without threat from those within or without our borders. Early Americans bought this freedom with blood, sweat and tears, and their descendants have paid for its maintenance since then with their lives and treasure. We want to keep America strong and free so that others like you may come and find opportunity and hope.

However, if you do not like our laws, our culture, or the freedoms we enjoy, you may want to look elsewhere. There are almost two hundred nations in the world. Perhaps one of the others would be a better choice. But if it is liberty you seek—both your own and the retention of ours—it is here, as our lady standing in New York harbor proudly proclaims.



Guess who does not want a border wall:

  • The Mexican drug cartels
  • Human traffickers
  • MS-13 gang members
  • Terrorists who want in to do us harm
  • Democrats


Don’t be fooled

If you believe that the current emphasis on environmentalism and climate change is merely a compassionate view of our responsibility to care for the earth, there is some oceanfront property in Kansas you might be interested in purchasing. Atmospheric shifts and temperature variances on the earth’s surface have been around at least since Genesis 6.

On the first Earth Day in 1970, they were warning of a new ice age that seemed to be approaching. Now, only 48 years later, they are decrying global warming and a greenhouse effect. Make no mistake, E-ism is just part of the agenda to ultimately have the state assume the ownership and/or management of our nation’s industries. They want to take commercial businesses and industry from private hands and place it under complete control of the government. Maybe they want to create a utopia like that in Venezuela. Check out the streets in the two largest California cities from which many environmentalists hail. Why don’t they start there where the homeless are spreading human waste all over the place?

Vaclav Klaus, the former president of the Czech Republic, a former Soviet state, said: “Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious environmentalism.”

C’mon students and millennials—get a grip. Learn to identify subversive anti-American politics when you hear it and see it.


Just so you know

Free enterprise: An economic system in which citizens may own private property, and businesses operate in competition and largely free of state control.

Capitalism: An economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. This keeps more money in the hands of private citizens who generally prove they know better how to handle it than does the government.

Socialism: A political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned and/or regulated by the state. In Marxist theory, it is a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism. Wealth is managed by the bureaucrats embedded in the government. The press and information sources are controlled by the state, as apparently are many college students and millennials.

Communism: A political theory derived from Karl Marx and leading to a society in which all commercial property is state owned and workers are paid on a scale determined by the state. China, Russia, and North Korea are examples of communist states. Personal freedom is virtually nil.

Fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy. It came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.


Restructuring America

Democrats are pushing for a total restructuring of our government using the covid-19 as an excuse. Naturally, they want the restructuring to embrace all the left-wing ideologies that are being floated by the new congresswomen in Washington. We seem to be allowing them to make headway with their stinking thinking.

The more illegals we embrace, the more we divide our nation into various “identities,” and the more liberal women (and men!) we elect to powerful political positions, the more movement we will see toward socialism and leftist policies. Parents, if that is what you want, do nothing. If, however, you love your children and desire the best future for them, and esteem Judeo-Christian values, run from every Democrat who picks up a microphone. Sadly, that party has been hijacked by socialists, communists, and liberals of every stripe. Speak up, talk to your family, resist fear. If we refuse to do those things NOW, weeping will have a prominent place in your future. Our children’s future will be lived in a totally different system than what you see in America today. Peek over into Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, China, Russia—or, God forbid, Iran or Saudi Arabia—for a glimpse of the existence they might experience as a result of our mental laziness and apathy.

Are we suggesting that women are incapable of serving as politicians, judges or other public officials? Of course not. But we can’t stick our heads in the sand and deny that most of current crop is there to transform the American system. Revisit the President’s State of the Union message and watch the women in white—pro-socialism, anti-American, anti-Christian activists—and watch the Leader In White tear up the President’s speech before the world.

Most of them represent the changes that are moving the nation farther left through the carrot stick of equality idealism. It is born of a natural inclination. Women are care-givers by nature. They are intrinsically bent toward compassion for those they perceive to be mistreated or the most vulnerable in society. They are usually motivated to get into politics to change things in favor of “the little person” they subconsciously view as “children” who need their loving care. Many of those “children” turn out to be gay activists, or homeless, the new immigrant, or other women who claim not to be receiving a fair shake. This plays out as the promotion of socialism.

How near are we to becoming a socialist state? A friend sent his opinion: “The next generation, maybe 20 years, or less. Kids today are educated with a socialist bent. The majority of immigrants want a socialist big government. Over one million illegal immigrants are pouring in each year. We need zero for a while. In 1984, Reagan won Texas by 27 points. Trump won Texas by only 9.” Go figure.


IHML Bible studies are still winning souls after 33 years!

IHMLCoverInto His Marvelous Light one-hour Bible study has helped win thousands of souls.

Only $1.75 each up to 49 copies, 1.50 each from 50-99 copies, and only 1.25 for orders IHML_GFL_Revisedof 100 or more. Follow-up study Guide For Living is same price.

Still the best soulwinning and soul-building tools you can use!

Order online at www.advanceministries.org/ or phone 936-537-0250.

Resupply your church members with Bible studies this month!



Donald Trump vs. the Media

Uh-oh…now we know what happened to N. Korea’s Kim:


The Last Words

 What you can and cannot control:

You can’t control:

• The actions of others

• Social distancing in all instances

• The amount of toilet paper at the store

• The predictions of sensationalists

• Exactly what will happen in the future

• How long this virus will last

• Other people’s motives

• How others react

You can control:

• Turning off the news

• Finding creative and fun things to do at home

• Your kindness and grace

• Your positive attitude

• Limiting your social media

• How you follow your pastor’s recommendations


Thanks for sharing a few minutes with us. Please remember to change my email address in your lists to jrensey1@gmail.com. Have a blessed day!


Published in: on May 1, 2020 at 2:15 AM  Leave a Comment  

JREnsey April 2020 blog

Thanks for taking a few minutes to visit about some important matters pertaining to both our secular society and God’s kingdom.

The Word for today:

So be truly glad. There is wonderful joy ahead, even though you must endure many trials for a little while. These trials will show that your faith is genuine. It is being tested as fire tests and purifies gold—though your faith is far more precious than mere gold. So when your faith remains strong through many trials, it will bring you much praise and glory and honor on the day when Jesus Christ is revealed to the whole world” (1 Peter 1:6,7 NLT).

Timely alternate word: “Cleanse your hands, ye sinners” (James 4:8 KJV).



We preachers always wanted a great library. Czech out the gorgeous Klementium Library in Prague, Czechoslovakia. Be still my heart.

Below is the library inside the Waldsassen Abbey in Bavaria, which holds thousands of volumes bound in white pigskin. These settings and their contents might be expensive to reproduce today. Isn’t it amazing that in this technological age we could carry all or most of these libraries in our briefcase?

If you think your 1987 Mercury Marquis is ancient, or that you yourself are getting old, remember that age is relative. The “Methuselah” bristlecone pine tree in California is said to be over 4,850 years old.

17-year old Juliane Koepcke was sucked out of an airplane in 1971 after it broke up over the Amazon rain forest, having been struck by a bolt of lightning. She fell two miles to the ground, strapped to her seat and survived, then endured more than 10 days in the Amazon jungle before being found. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juliane_Koepcke

Carbonized bread from Pompeii, baked in AD 79, still bearing the baker’s stamp.

Pentecostals and covid-19



Definition:  An increasingly popular term representing differences within any entity. Differences can be good or bad, positive or negative, progressive or regressive, helpful or hindering. It all depends on the definition we have in mind when we employ the term.

The church should be diverse. The church should not be diverse. Both of those statements are correct. To use the term in such a general way can evoke confusion and misunderstanding. It all depends on one’s definition of diversity and the context in which it is used. Some use the term to undergird their particular vision of what the church should be.

If we are discussing race and ethnicity, or color of skin or national origin, then, ideally, the church will probably reflect the community it serves. If we are talking about pluralistic cultural diversity, that is another matter. Different elements of society, outside of those mentioned, have varying values, ethics, morals and divergent agendas that may run counter to the purposes of the church. In that case, the church should not reflect the community it is reaching out to influence. At some point the church has to identify and live out what “be ye separate” (II Corinthians 6:17) means.

The church is not designed to be a melting pot of values, ethics, morals, and beliefs. Some Christian denominations have decided that they must reflect their culture in every way in order to be effective in it. How is that working out for them? “A little leaven….”

Blandness has left the European Christian community as a tasteless concoction, impotent and fading. America may be following only a short distance behind. The suggestion of Jesus was that His people should affect the world in which it exists, make a difference, be a light, add a spice (Mark 16:15,16; Matthew 5:13,17).

The church has to be different in order to make a difference.


O, the scourge of global warming!

Take a look: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTyoT0agyg4&feature=youtu.be


“The Squad” strikes again

Led by the socialist squad of four women, 174 House of Representatives Democrats recently voted against an anti-terrorist and sexual predator amendment regarding employment by the TSA, the folks that screen air travelers. They mustn’t be unfair to the Harvey Weinsteins or the Muslim terrorists of the world when it comes to doling out taxpayer’s money. Right? This Marxist-leaning coalition is in the news daily leading the charge to turn America into a socialist state.

Where, oh where, have women like Phyllis Schlafly gone? If we must elect women to Congress, then elect some who love this country, who want to preserve personal and religious freedom, who want the Constitution upheld, and the rule of law to be honored.

We get what we elect, folks.


Book review:

Seven things wimps won’t say

Hell? Yes!

By Robert Jeffress

Colorado Springs: Waterbrook Press, 1995; 23.95 (available at Amazon)

The author of this book is the pastor of First Baptist Church of Dallas, one of the largest in the nation, whose facilities cover several city blocks of downtown Dallas. Pastor Jeffress is an outspoken advocate of conservative political values as well as a proponent of biblical veracity. You have likely seen his face and heard his voice on social media. He is unapologetic about his traditionalist views on the Scriptures.

This book has seven chapters, the titles being seven things spiritual wimps likely won’t ever say. The chapters are:

  • Every Other Religion Is Wrong
  • God Is Ultimately Responsible for Suffering
  • God Sends Good People to Hell
  • Homosexuality Is a Perversion
  • Husbands Are to Be the Leaders of Their Families
  • Evolution Is a Myth
  • America Is a Christian Nation

How is that for a list that will wring cries of dismay from liberal preachers and left-wing media talking heads? Jeffress, however, is fearless. I recently attended a meeting where he was the speaker. He leaves no question in your mind as to where he stands. He quotes Scripture like barristers quote Blackstone. He is as pro-life as one can be. He has more to lose by standing strong on social isses than most pastors but is unfazed by media moguls or liberal professors. He appears to be a selfless individual. That is not judging the author’s standing with God, or judging him at all. The salvation gospel is what it is and always has been. This is just saying that the book is worth reading. It won’t waste your time.

A cautionary note: It is not a book for spiritual wimps.


Important articles worth your time to read:

Why we are a Republic, not a Democracy

By Walter Williams


Our culture degrades women by trying to make them men

By Annie Holmquist


Other interesting articles by Annie Holmquist:

Camille Paglia: Neo feminism teaching women to live in ‘a permanently juvenile condition’


Boys are Growing Frustrated by Living in a Feminized Society… and That’s Showing Up in Their Friendships



A story of selfless heroism

“I spit in the doctor’s face!”

Would it ever be right to spit in a doctor’s face? It happened…and it saved a man’s life! Sometimes you just have to do what you have to do.

One of our Texas heroes who earned the Congressional Medal of Honor was a man of physical and moral strength. His courage and selflessness deserved the honor bestowed upon him by the US President Ronald Reagan.

In the steamy jungles of South Vietnam was where it all happened. The inspiring story of Staff Sergeant Roy Benavidez is worth your time!

You can read the incredible story HERE, or watch a brief video HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B2w0abQazg  His heroic actions save the lives of at least eight men. His heroism saved others, but his spit saved his own life!



If unvaccinated American kids aren’t allowed in public schools, why would we import millions of unvaccinated migrants?

Representative Maxine Waters wants open borders and the privilege to vote in U.S. elections for anyone who can get across the border. Yet she requires those attending her town hall meetings to show photo ID. How hypocritical is that? When she and Nancy Pelosi remove the locks from their gates and doors, then we should consider open borders.

A transgender activist who still has male genitalia is reportedly ‘shocked,’ ‘confused,’ and ‘hurt’ after being turned away by a gynecologist who told him, “You’re playing make believe. Real doctors don’t have time for that foolishness.” He had been to a salon seeking a bikini wax and they also turned him down.  Blaze, 12/3  Is there no end to this nonsense? (No pun intended.)

Leftists think injecting hormones into cattle is evil, but injecting kids with hormones to change their gender is just fine. Patriot Post

Why is it that the only two genders that have reportedly had covid-19 are male and female? Does that mean that the other 57 genders are immune?

Fact: 66.6% of presidents who have been impeached by the House were guilty of humiliating Hillary Clinton. – Mark Alexander

Eight sex offenders—three of which were convicted of raping children—have been released from a jail in New York as a part of Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s statewide initiative to decrease prison populations over fear of spreading the coronavirus. Were these prisoners the safest ones he could have turned loose on the public? Where has common sense gone?

Barack Obama has reportedly announced that he is no longer taking credit for the economy.


It Happened In A House

A young African-American minister, William Seymour was attending a Christian training mission in Houston in 1905. In those meetings, he met Neely Terry, a young woman who was part of a group that founded a black church in Los Angeles affiliated with the Church of the Nazarene. The group had been expelled from the Baptist church when they began teaching holiness and sanctification. She was impressed with Seymour’s sincerity and convinced her church leaders to invite him come to LA and minister in their church. He considered the invitation to be a call from God and arrived in California in February of 1906.

He was subsequently asked to preach in the church, which was led by Julia Hutchins. As yet he had not personally received the Holy Spirit and spoken with tongues, but was convinced that it was scriptural. When Seymour took the pulpit, he chose Acts 2:4 for his text. In the message he conveyed his conviction that “anyone who has not spoken in tongues does not have the Holy Spirit.” This did not set well with the more starchy Nazarene types, so they gave him the boot and actually padlocked the door of the church against his return. The more open-minded individuals in the congregation offered their homes to him for house meetings. One of these was the Asberry (or Asbury) family, living at 214 Bonnie Brae Street. That little house became the focal point of the Pentecostal outpouring, tagged by many as the initial thunderstorm of the biblical “latter rain.” Since the church was on “lockdown,” God moved the revival to a house!

It was in the house on Bonnie Brae St. that Seymour and others received the Holy Spirit. The prayer meetings held there were powerful. Soon hundreds were attracted to the meetings, filling the home and overflowing onto the porch and the yard. The porch actually collapsed under the weight of the crowd trying to participate in the prayer services. Police had to actually cordon off the street where the house was because of the crowds on foot, horseback and in carriages (traffic, if you will) trying to get to the house where God was moving. Even Julia Hutchins, the Nazarene leader who locked Seymour out of her church, received the Holy Spirit and ultimately became a missionary to Liberia.

The original Pentecostal outpouring occurred in an upper room in a house in Jerusalem: “It filled all the house were they sitting.” In America it also began in a humble house, not a church! When the house could no longer hold the crowds, another meeting place was sought. In April of 1906, they found an old warehouse at 312 Azusa Street in LA that had once been used as a stable and for a while as an AME church. There the Spirit fell in torrents during the next few years. People from many denominations came to the Azusa St. location and received the Holy Spirit and took the message of Acts 2 back to their communities. Missionaries from foreign lands came to see what was happening there, received their Pentecostal experience and returned to their fields with the power of the Spirit. Doubters and unbelievers said Pentecostal revival “will soon blow over.” It did…all over the world!

What can God do in our houses during the current quarantine? The Bible tells us to not forsake the assembling of ourselves together (Hebrews 10:25), but while our churches are on temporary lockdown, God may have in mind another mighty Pentecostal revival in somebody’s house. Let it happen!


Re-supply your stash of Bible studies now!

The best soul winning aid produced in the last 25 years.

IHMLCoverInto His Marvelous Light one-hour Bible study is the easiest to use!

Only $1.75 each up to 49 copies, 1.50 each from 50-99 copies, and only 1.25 for orders IHML_GFL_Revisedof 100 or more. Follow-up study Guide For Living is same price.

Still the best soulwinning tool you can use!

Order online at www.advanceministries.org/ or phone 936-537-0250.



As they say… 

So we should let the millennials install that system here?

A pox on the virus!

Common sense has a terminal virus:


The last word

…and sane!

Published in: on April 1, 2020 at 2:10 AM  Leave a Comment  

JREnsey March Blog

Welcome to the JREnsey March 2020 blog with a focus on Galatians 3:28—What does this verse mean?


The Word for Today

“Give honor to marriage, and remain faithful to one another in marriage. God will surely judge people who are immoral and those who commit adultery.

Don’t love money; be satisfied with what you have. For God has said, “I will never fail you. I will never abandon you.” So we can say with confidence, “The Lord is my helper, so I will have no fear. What can mere people do to me?”

Remember your leaders who taught you the word of God. Think of all the good that has come from their lives, and follow the example of their faith. Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.

So do not be attracted by strange, new ideas. Your strength comes from God’s grace, not from rules about food, which don’t help those who follow them” (Hebrews 13:4-8 NLT).


Galatians 3:28—Does It Erase All Gender Distinctions?

J. R. Ensey

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus” (KJV).

Let’s go right to the heart of the matter: Does this verse establish an extreme theological view of individual equality that erases all gender distinctions and functions for Christian males and females? Egalitarians generally say yes[1]; complementarians say no.[2] Who is right?

Until a few decades ago, this verse did not seem to evoke such widespread ideological division. Commentators and Greek grammarians over the years broke it down for readers and pointed out its harmony with other scriptural passages.

Enter the women’s liberation movements of the 1960s and 1970s. A rebellion—actually a revolution—occurred that turned Western culture on its ear. Women began to insist on full access to the workplaces traditionally staffed by men. Headscarves were traded for hard hats. Lesbian-led marches filled the streets while feminist articles filled the magazines. Their demands were soon heard in Congress and affirmed in the courts. Emboldened by the full support of the media and academia, they saw the opportunity to emasculate males and overturn what they viewed as a patriarchal society. The process would divide and re-shape much of American Christianity into a radical egalitarian movement. A minority of men got on the bandwagon with them right away. Others drew back when they saw the insurmountable problems that would ensue. The majority seemed to opt for silence and took a wait-and-see attitude. They got trampled in the melee.

Homelife deteriorated as women assumed masculine roles and attire while Hollywood and the media promoted the epicene Mr. Mom caricature. He was depicted in the kitchen wearing an apron, holding a vacuum cleaner in one hand and a diaper-clad baby in the other. In that scenario, the wife is seen walking out the door in a suit and tie carrying a briefcase.[3] One was made to wonder if the goal was equality or a total reversal of roles. The divorce rate rose exponentially. Households with single moms multiplied.

Confusion resulted. We sowed the wind and today we are reaping the whirlwind. Some teens now do not know whether they are male or female, perhaps even multi-gendered. They are presented with many choices by the change agents serving as editors in social media contexts. Homosexuality is rampant. Transgenderism is promoted in our schools with special protections from the courts. Ads across virtually all social media platforms feature feminine attire for men and masculine duds for women. The Bible is cast as an outdated patriarchal document written by and for an ancient generation, badly in need of reinterpretation. Magazine and news editors, as well as school teachers, are warned to use the proper personal pronouns for individuals they reference.[4] Patronization has reached the level of pure nonsense. Churches are urged to “catch up” with the culture and one denomination after the other has fallen in line with the terms of the feminist manifesto. To raise one’s voice today against this social and spiritual corruption earns a hate label. All of this has occurred in less than my own lifetime.

In the face of these facts, do we remain silent and retreat into a shell of self-preservation or stand up and be counted as Christians who will resist the imposition of anti-God and anti-Bible values on our children and grandchildren? Hard choices seem to be the only choices.

The purpose of this analysis

The primary focus of this article is to question the use of Galatians 3:28 to promote the current egalitarian agenda. It will not be an angst-free endeavor for I have deeply committed, knowledgeable friends who prefer to take another approach. This will be an honest “as I see it”[5] understanding of Paul’s statement.

“Progressive” Christian feminists who seem to be offended by Paul’s compelling and clear references supporting a complementarian view of the family and church expand the parameters of this verse to comply with their predilections. Some appear to be annoyed with God Himself for including verses in the Bible that do not affirm their chosen perspective. Others argue that this verse should be a “‘window’ text through which to adjudicate other Pauline texts.”[6] In other words, all other biblical texts of Paul should bow to the egalitarian interpretation of this one, basically encouraging us to ignore those texts. Is that reasonable? Is it theologically sound?

To support the increasingly popular views mentioned above, some overlay the Bible with a feminist hermeneutic, using Galatians 3:28 as a linchpin. There is a tendency to strip away the context, allowing the verse to become a stand alone theology, totally separate and apart from the remainder of Scripture. Comprehension and clarity are clouded when it is removed from its context (chapters 3 and 4), inviting misunderstanding.[7]

What is the apostle really saying in this verse? Isn’t he urging the Galatians to ignore the Judaizers who want them to continue certain practices of the law in order to be saved (Galatians 2:4,5)? Isn’t the apostle making it clear to the new Christians in Galatia, particularly targeting the Jewish converts, that in Christ there are no value distinctions between believers, that no one is either superior or inferior because of his or her station in life, that when determining whether one is a child of Abraham by faith, neither gender, race nor social class are relevant? The ground is level at the foot of the cross. Positionally in Christ we are all equals having identical worth, dignity and value, regardless of age, race, gender, ethnicity, skin color, whether free or in bondage. This view of the body of Christ is made clear in the preceding verses (26,27). This statement attacked any effort by the Judaizers’ to marginalize women or any other social group.[8] Functionally, however, we are still obligated to the guidelines that Scripture provides for us as individuals and families (Ephesians 5:22-30; I Peter 3:1-8; Titus 2:1-9; I Timothy 2:1-15; 3:1-13; et al).[9]

In Romans 4:25-5:2, Paul again describes the Christian’s position in Christ: “[Jesus] was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification. Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ: By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.” The universality of this position for all Christians is also laid out in the verses preceding and following Galatians 3:28. Many other passages describe our position is Christ, yet not overlooking the varying functions with qualifications in the practice of both home and church life (Ephesians 5:22-25; I Timothy 2:9-15; I Corinthians 11:2-16;14:34,35; I Peter 3:1-7; et al).

According to author S. Lewis Johnson, “There is no reason to claim that Galatians 3:28 supports an egalitarianism of function in the church. [although] It does plainly teach an egalitarianism of privilege in the covenantal union of believers in Christ.”[10] (Italics mine) James B. Hurley agrees: “Our study of the context of Galatians 3:28 has shown that Paul was not reflecting upon relations within the body of Christ when he had the text penned. He was thinking about the basis of membership in the body of Christ. This means that it is an error to say that ‘all one’ in Christ means that there are no distinctions within the body.”[11]

Believers are not neutered by conversion or the facts stated in Galatians 3:28. Although one is “in Christ” after conversion, the apostle states that wives still have to submit to their husbands and husbands have to love their wives as Christ loved the church. Men are still men and women are still women. Christianity has not created a gender-free, androgynous society, changing all patterns of home and public life in place since the reckoning of time. Also, if believers were slaves when they were converted, Paul wasn’t saying they are now free to walk away but are still bound to their owners/masters. In fact, slaves were given instructions elsewhere for their appropriate behavior (Ephesians 6:5-9; I Peter 2:18-25). Children were still to obey their parents (Ephesians 6:1-3). Neither Christ nor Paul expressed a purpose to overturn all universal laws and practices arising out of biblical principles.

In other words, Galatians 3:28 was not a release from all obligations having to do with gender distinctions or stations in life. Paul did not negate the creation model to which he repeatedly appealed to establish practices and behaviors. Again, former positions and dissimilarities were still in place after commitment to Christ—slaves were still slaves, children didn’t become self-disciplining adults via conversion, and wives still have to yield ultimate authority to their husbands who are mandated to love them as Christ loves the church. There is no place in Scripture that cancels those conditions.

The context of Galatians 3:28 makes abundantly clear the sense in which men and women are equal in Christ: they are “equally justified by faith (v. 24), equally free from the bondage of legalism (v. 25), equally children of God (v. 26), equally clothed with Christ (v. 27), equally possessed by Christ (v. 29), and equally heirs of the promises to Abraham (v. 29).  …Galatians 3:28 does not abolish gender-based roles established by God.”[12] Paul affirms the oneness of males and females in Christ, but he does not claim that maleness and femaleness are irrelevant in every respect (Romans 1:21-32; I Corinthians 7; 11:1-15; 14:34,35; I Timothy 2:8-16; Titus 1:5-7; 2:1-10; I Peter 3:1-7).

By expanding a text to conform to current political correctness, we could end up in the same quagmire as our Christless culture. Nuancing and dissecting this verse to support an agenda generated extra-biblically could lead to divisions and misunderstandings in virtually every human relationship.

One in Christ

The “oneness” of which Paul speaks in this verse is the foundation of his position. The whole is highlighted in contrast to its several parts. He made similar observations in his letters to the churches at Corinth (I Corinthians 12:13) and Colosse (Colossians 3:11). He identifies six different groups he says are “one in Christ”: Jews, Greeks, slaves, free, males, and females. How can all of this diversity—slaves and masters, males and females, parents and children, circumcised and uncircumcised, Sythian and barbarian, bond or free—achieve a oneness? It occurs when they come “into Christ” (Galatians 3:27; Romans 6:3) and are joined together with those of “like precious faith” (II Peter 1:1). All are “one in Christ” and have taken His name, but that does not change a Jew into a Greek, a circumcised male into one uncircumcised, or a slave into a freedman, or a female into a male, automatically altering human associations and particular responsibilities. Former relationships, as Paul points out in many places, are still in order. All Christian converts are placed into “one body” (I Corinthians 12:12) but the body has members with different functions. God and Christ are “one” (John 10:30), yet the Father (the “one Spirit” of Deity; Ephesians 4:4) and the Son (read “flesh”; Hebrews 5:7) perform different functions and roles.

Being one in Christ does not mean that everyone has the same authority, exercises the same responsibilities, performs the same functions, or possesses the same giftings for service. There is no suggestion of interchangeability of roles and responsibilities in v. 28. Paul’s affirmation of oneness in Christ is not a call for total irrelevance of gender in every sense of the word.[13] It does not follow that equality in some respects entails equality in all respects. The topic is less broad than many egalitarians are willing to concede.

The apostle adds this in Romans 12:5: “For as we have many members in one body, and all members have not the same office: So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another. Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us….” All Christian converts are placed into “one body” having different members (I Corinthians 12:12) that are assigned varying responsibilities and functions—that seems to be the background and application of the Galatians 3:28 principle.

The source of Paul’s writings

Egalitarians appeal to the concept that Paul was stuck in a patriarchal Jewish mindset that was in vogue then, creating an attitude that resulted in his complementarian statements elsewhere in the New Testament, which have no relevance to today’s Christians. That was then; this is now, and his way is not applicable today. Such an approach suggests that we toss the Bible—or at least reinterpret it—giving ear to the culture for guidance in matters pertaining to home and church.

Paul’s writings, however, transcended cultural or legal mandates. He clearly stated where he got his material: “If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord” (I Corinthians 14:37).[14] Committed Christians are guided by God’s decrees and not by cultural philosophies and edicts.

The other apostles did not correct Paul or add a new dimension to his teaching to accommodate present or future emerging social philosophies. Agreement among NT writers on this issue is evident. Also, early Protestant leaders did not attempt to reform every aspect of civil governments, including slavery, children’s rights, or the function of women in the church and the home. The KJV translators obviously saw it Paul’s way. The vast majority of the well-known ministers, Bible commentators, authors and Christian leaders of the last 300 years subscribed to these apostolic tenets. While that in itself doesn’t authenticate a particular view, it does suggest that the egalitarian cloak thrown over this verse is relatively new and is not generally considered to be in line with the thrust of this or other passages dealing with the topic. Although some Bible translators have surrendered to feminist pressure, many of the major contemporary translations give little ground beyond turning “brethren” into “brothers and sisters” in places. Scriptural interpretation should be based on that old golden rule of hermeneutics: “When the sense of the Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense, lest it result in nonsense.”

We see an abundance of nonsense in the current political scene. Some radical feminists (both male and female) are suing public servants for using traditional pronouns when referring to others. The “he” one is addressing might prefer the pronoun “she” or one of fifty other designations. The leading female candidate for president of the USA has gone to great lengths to court LGBTQ support. She has, for example, emphasized the need to allow inmates to be held in prison based on their chosen gender identity rather than their biological sex. She promises to name women and non-binary individuals to at least half of her cabinet positions. Also, she has found a transgender child, Jacob Lemay, age 9, whom she says must personally approve of her choice as Secretary of Education.[15] There seems to be no stopping place when one pitches his or her tent toward Sodom.


Having some truth does not necessarily mean that one has all truth. There may be some mutual ground for complementarians and egalitarians. For example, both believe in equality, but the scriptural dimensions of that equality need discussion and agreement. Pressure from the current culture seems to have expanded those dimensions until agreement may be difficult but not unachievable. We must always go back to the Bible with a goal of objectivity to find a position closest to the truth. Conformity to apostolic doctrines and less diversity in practice will generate more conversions to absolute truth. Accommodation to political correctness is not the path to real and lasting revival—it is the road to compromise and spiritual declension.



[1] Douglas J. Moo states, “It is easy to quote the saying in this verse as a slogan that proclaims the erasure of any distinctions within the Christian community” in Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament: Galatians (Grand Rapids: Baker Publishing Group, 2013), p. 254. This statement is based on the written record, including the following references: Paul King Jewett, known as a “biblical” feminist, calls Galatians 3:28 the “Magna Carta of Humanity” in Man As Male and Female: A Study in Sexual Relationships from a Theological Point of View (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1975), p. 142; Klyne Snodgrass calls it “the most socially explosive statement in the New Testament” in “Galatians 3:28: Conundrum or Solution?” in Men, Women, Authority and the Bible, ed. Alvera Mickelsen (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1986), p. 161. Ronald and Beverly Allen call it “the feminist credo of equality” in Liberated Traditionalism: Men and Women in Balance (Portland, OR: Multnomah Press, 1985), p. 134; Mary Hayter refers to it as “a crux” and ‘the locus classicus’ for biblical feminists” in The New Eve in Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1987), p. 134.
[2] Complementarianism is a theological view that men and women have different but complementary roles and responsibilities in marriage, family life, and religious leadership. (Wikipedia) Complementarians would include authors like Wayne House, Wayne Grudem, Abigail Dodds, Denny Burk, John Piper, to name a few, some of whom will be referenced in this paper.
[3] Some questioned the wisdom of the UPCI for taking a stand against movies and television (recommendations to avoid them are still in the Manual), but it was easy to see the negative influence they were having on family life. They recognized that these media outlets promoted, and still do, everything the Bible opposes as sin and ungodliness, including biblical family life. Nations, as well as individuals and families, reap what they sow.
[4] Apparently God is undergoing a sex change, according to some women’s groups, or is at least taking hormone treatments. Some feminists have begun using “her” as an acceptable pronoun for God as part of the process being called “the feminization of God.” Taking God’s “feminine side,” as extremists call it, as an example, men are encouraged to “get in touch with their feminine side.” Where will this lead?
[5] In addition to many other authors and commentators, some of whom are quoted herein.
[6] David M. Scholer, “Galatians 3:28 and the Ministry of Women in the Church,” in Theology, News and Notes (Pasadena, Calif.: Fuller Theological Seminary, June 1998), 20.
[7] As is often said, “A text without a context is a pretext for a prooftext.”
[8] Ancient Jewish morning prayers for men included thanks to God for not being “a Gentile, a slave, or a woman.”
[9] Someone put it this way: “It’s important to note that this teaching is not based on the current climate of the culture. It is not liberal, conservative, or political. It is the direct result of the gospel. It is not a statement about the various roles any Christian may be called to fill in this life or the honor we may or may not be given on this side of eternity. It is a statement about our equal value in the eyes of God, and how we should learn to view each other. Since all Christians are in Christ, all of us are one.” http://www.bibleref.com/Galatians/3/Galatians-3-28.html#verse.
[10] S. Lewis Johnson, “Role Distinctions in the Church,” in Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, eds. John Piper and Wayne Grudem (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 1991), 164. James B. Hurley, Man and Woman in Biblical Perspective (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1981), 127, italics his.
[11] James B. Hurley, Man and Woman in Biblical Perspective (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1981), 127.
[12] John Piper and Wayne Grudem, “An Overview of Central Concerns: Questions and Answers,” in Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, 71-72.
[13] “If one were to draw such a conclusion, then Paul would not object to homosexuality, but it is clear that he thinks homosexuality is sinful (Rom 1:26 – 27; 1 Cor 6:9; 1 Tim 1:10).  In the same way, the equality of men and women in Christ does not cancel out, in Paul’s mind, the distinct roles of men and women in marriage (Eph 5:22–33; Col 3:18–19; Titus 2:4–5) or in ministry contexts (1 Cor. 11:2–16; 14:33–36; 1 Tim 2:9–15).” (Thomas Schreiner, Zondervan Exegetical Commentary; Galatians)
[14] Once, when he digressed from that source regarding some interpersonal relationships and slavery, he acknowledged that it was his personal judgment and not the Lord’s commandment (I Corinthians 7:6, 25). Otherwise his writings were God’s requirements.
[15] https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/30/elizabeth-warren-vows-transgender-child-must-appro/. Is this the vision some have of our country—a nation led by women and children?


Pete Buttigieg: “I’m Not Going To Take Lectures On Family Values From The Likes Of Rush Limbaugh”

Former South Bend Mayor and presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg responded recently to comments from conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh about him kissing his “husband” in public, saying he won’t take advice from Mr. Limbaugh on family values. “I love my husband. I’m faithful to my husband,” Mr. Buttigieg said. “I’m not going to take lectures on family values from the likes of Rush Limbaugh.”

One wonders just who has been giving him lessons on family values. Since [he] is a wife, and has a husband, would he really be the first female U.S. President? More confusion on the horizon.

He also expressed that “so much depends on how we make ourselves useful to those who are marginalized and oppressed.” That would be his guiding philosophy and primary objective if he is elected. If his type or a woman is elected to the presidency, we will hear “poor babies” for every far out liberal idee fixe in the book, both in America and around the world.


No place to stop

Elizabeth Warren promises that one half her cabinet will be women, including non-binary individuals (transgenders, multi-gendered, asexuals, whatever), and now she says a transgender boy age 9 will have to give his approval for whoever she selects as Secretary of Education. Going even farther to court LGBTQ support in the Democratic primary, she has, for example, emphasized the need to allow inmates to be held in prison based on their chosen gender identity, rather than their biological sex. Now how do you think such a law might be interpreted by liberal judges in the future? Don’t even think about it.

Angel Alicea, a Democrat field organizer for Elizabeth Warren, is referencing a relatively recent emphasis on the use of people’s chosen pronouns, rather than assuming the pronoun of their biological gender. “Where I come from, no one cares about a pronoun. They want to know how you’re gonna create a job” (expletives deleted). I think he agrees with James Carville and me that there seems to be no rest stops or exits on the roads to anarchy, socialism or Sodom.


Samson: “Which way went [common sense] from me?”

Bleeding hearts in New York recently enacted the “Green Light Law,” which gives illegal aliens access to drivers’ licenses—but also blocks federal agencies like ICE and CPB from accessing the state’s DMV records without a court order—was the tipping point. In a letter provided to state officials, Wolf noted the law “compromises CPB’s ability to confirm whether an individual applying to TTP membership meets the program’s eligibility requirement.”

Why is that important? “In New York alone, last year ICE arrested 149 child predators, identified or rescued 105 victims of exploitation and human trafficking, arrested 230 gang members, and seized 6,487 pounds of illegal narcotics, including fentanyl and opioids,” Wolf added. “In the vast majority of these cases, ICE relied on New York DMV records to fulfill its mission.”

And that was before the law took effect in December, precipitating a surge of illegals rushing to New York DMVs to obtain their new identification, using foreign documents such as passports or a driver’s license to get it.

What is going on in our east and west coast states?

Even the blind Samson knew when it was time to drain the swamp and topple the temples of the idolaters!


Now is the time for Bible studies!

Use the one that has won more souls than any other—Into His Marvelous Light

IHML Bible Studies

IHMLCoverAvailable in English, Spanish, German & Italian
No other one-hour Bible study has enjoyed the consistent results of IHML over the years. Often copied but never fully duplicated. It is attractive, well written, and doctrinally sound. Those who are seeking for Availabletruth will see that the new birth is absolutely essential and that Acts 2:38 constitutes that experience. Over 2 million copies sold.

$1.75 ea
$1.50 ea
$1.25 ea


Guide For Living 
IHML_GFL_RevisedA follow-up study for the new convert. This little booklet can be given to the new convert to go through alone and then come back to you with any questions they may have. It covers the new birth—what has happened to them in conversion and goes through what their spiritual responsibilities are now.

$1.75 ea
$1.50 ea
$1.25 ea


IHML Promotional Tracts
pampletsAvailable in English & Spanish
Distributing these tracts helps to locate those in your community who are interested in a Bible study. Available in English and Spanish. It’s easy to get Bible study opportunities with these tracts.  $9.95 per 100.

Order from Advance Ministries or call 936-537-0250.

NEW!   An exciting video showing how to use the IHML Bible study to win souls! Brother Michael Ensey has taught the Bible study on video to let soul winners see how easy it is! FREE! See it HERE


Memes I couldn’t pass up

If Joe Biden knows how to fix America, why didn’t he tell Obama?

Elizabeth Warren credits “her people” (the Chiefs) with winning the Super Bowl.

Abortion is “health care,” cry the feminists! But wait, true health care doesn’t kill people!

If you were to kill kids and keep them in the fridge, you’d be Jeffrey Dahmer. When Planned Parenthood does it, its “health care” and “empowers women.”


The last word:

Apostolics have a voice. It is time to let the world hear it!

Hurry, November!


PS – Share this blog with someone you care about. Encourage them to subscribe to the notification list.

Published in: on March 1, 2020 at 2:22 AM  Comments (3)  

JREnsey February Blog

Welcome to the February 2020 blog. Reminder: Please note the change of email address for JREnsey. Please change my email address in your lists to  jrensey1@gmail.com for all personal communication. Thanks!


The Word for Today

“In the same way, you wives must accept the authority of your husbands. Then, even if some refuse to obey the Good News, your godly lives will speak to them without any words. They will be won over by observing your pure and reverent lives. Don’t be concerned about the outward beauty of fancy hairstyles, expensive jewelry, or beautiful clothes. You should clothe yourselves instead with the beauty that comes from within, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is so precious to God. This is how the holy women of old made themselves beautiful. They put their trust in God and accepted the authority of their husbands. For instance, Sarah obeyed her husband, Abraham, and called him her master. You are her daughters when you do what is right without fear of what your husbands might do. In the same way, you husbands must give honor to your wives. Treat your wife with understanding as you live together. She may be weaker than you are, but she is your equal partner in God’s gift of new life. Treat her as you should so your prayers will not be hindered.” (I Peter 3:1-7 NLT).


Judge tosses 5 charges against pro-life activists for undercover videos

A California judge dismissed five felony charges against two activists who secretly recorded Planned Parenthood executives talking about the practice of providing the body parts of aborted babies for research.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra charged the activists in 2017 with 14 criminal counts of filming people without permission and one count of conspiracy to do so.

One of the charges was previously thrown out, and Superior Court Judge Christopher Hite dismissed five more, leaving nine charges remaining, according to a release posted on Twitter by David Daleiden, one of the activists.

“Their case is falling apart as the facts about Planned Parenthood’s criminal organ tracking are revealed in the courtroom,” the release said. – Epoch Times


Alexis De Tocqueville on American women

After visiting and touring America, De Tocqueville (1806-1859), a French diplomat and historian, describes the biblical American scene regarding equality between men and women versus the European socialistic approach.

“There are people in Europe who, confounding the various attributes of the sexes, claim to make man and woman into creatures not only equal but alike. They ascribe the same functions to both, assign them the same duties, and grant them the same rights. They mix them in all things: work, pleasure, affairs. It is easy to see how trying in this way to make one sex equal to the other degrades them both and how the only thing that can ever come of such a crude mixture of nature’s works is weak men and disreputable women.

“This was not how Americans understood the kind of democratic equality that can be established between woman and man. They believed that because nature had made man and woman so different in physical and moral constitution, its clear purpose was to assign different uses to the diverse faculties of each. They judged, moreover, that progress lay not in making dissimilar beings do virtually identical things but in seeing to it that each acquitted itself of its task in the best possible way. Americans…carefully divided the functions of man and woman in order to carry out the great work of society more effectively.

“No country in the world has been more persistent than America in tracing clearly separated lines of action for the two sexes or in wanting both to proceed at an equal pace, but along two permanently different paths. You do not see in American women managing the family’s outside affairs, conducting a business, or entering the sphere of politics, but neither do you find American women forced to do hard labor or engage in any of the arduous activities that require the development of physical strength. There are no families so poor as to constitute exceptions to this rule.

“Americans, moreover, never assumed that the consequence of democratic principles would be to topple the husband from power and confuse lines of authority within the family. They believed that every association needs a leader in order to be effective and that the natural leader of the conjugal association was the man. Hence they did not deny him the right to direct his helpmate, and they believed that in the small society consisting of husband and wife, as in the larger political society, the purpose of democracy is to regulate and legitimate necessary powers and not to destroy all power.

“This is not an opinion held by one sex and contested by the other. American women did not, in my view, appear to regard conjugal authority as a felicitous usurpation of their rights, nor did they believe that it was degrading to submit to it. On the contrary, it seemed to me that in a way they prided themselves on the voluntary sacrifice of their will and demonstrated their greatness by freely accepting the yoke rather than seeking to avoid it. That, at any rate, was the sentiment expressed by the most virtuous among them.”

– Alexis de Toqueville, Democracy in America, Arthur Goldhammer, translator (New York, NY: Literary Classics of the United States, 2004); pp. 705, 706. (Italics mine)


The communist view

In his book, Women and the Family, Leon Trotsky (1879-1940) writes with contempt towards what De Tocqueville admired in American women, which is essentially the Proverbs 31 wife and the biblical homelife.

Trotsky, a leader of the Bolshevik communist revolution in Russia, sought to liberate women from “obsolete household work by replacing it with communal houses, public eating places, central laundries, nurseries, etc.” (p. 10)

Trotsky followed the thinking of Frederick Engels in the book The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State.  (p. 8)

“The Bolshevik program of Lenin and Trotsky’s time was correct: to liberate women from their role as domestic slaves by replacing the private family household with communal forms of living.” (p. 17)

“As long as woman is chained to her housework, the care of the family, the cooking and sewing, all her chances of participation in social and political life are cut down in the extreme.”

– Leon Trotsky, Women and the Family (New York, NY: Pathfinder Press, 1970) (p. 24)

Think about it: Christian America was the home of the Proverbs 31 woman.  – JRE


A step backward forward

The nation of Hungary has eliminated “gender studies” in their colleges. President Orban said they aren’t important like math. He also defies the EU on migrants and encourages people to have babies to preserve “Hungarian culture.” Evidently he has observed what is coming down in the U.S.A. You go, Viktor!



Trump promotes religious freedom

President Trump acted in the best interests of the American people recently when he signed an executive order to bolster and protect the rights of students to pray and discuss God in their schools. The order champions and reinforces the freedom of religion guaranteed to us in the Constitution as one of our most important rights.

The president appropriately took the action on National Religious Freedom Day. His executive order also ensures that religious entities are not excluded from participating in government-funded programs.

– https://video.foxnews.com/v/6123376262001#sp=show-clips


Who split the United Methodist Church?

The denomination has struggled for years with the issue that has been pushed hard by new female clergy and LGBTQ adherents. The impasse was recognized and the church decided to split over the pressure to ordain gay clergy and perform same-sex marriages.

“I’m actually really sad that we couldn’t build a bridge that could have provided a witness to the world of what unity amid diversity and disagreement could look like,” Methodist Bishop Karen Oliveto, the denomination’s first openly gay bishop, said.

There you have it. The gays will blame the “traditionalists” even though they are standing where the founders of Methodism stood. When change is being forced on a movement to make room for the acceptance of sin and/or unbiblical practice, who should be tagged with the blame for a split?

Perhaps one should take note of who is leading the charge to ordain homosexuals and perform gay marriages.



Worth repeating

Ed Stetzer, the president of LifeWay Research, recently published a compelling article regarding the shifts within Christianity and churches in America. He states, “The lasting effects of these shifts will force churches to make a critical decision. They will either become a cultural church that allows the societal trends to dictate their ever-changing beliefs. Or they will become a counter-cultural church that faithfully adheres to Scripture and proclaims the gospel in a carefully considered way. The latter church will offer real hope in the midst of an adversarial culture and is the only real future for the American church.”


For the original article, visit edstetzer.com.


Whispers and shouts

Everyone knows that some members of the House of Representatives are unethical, corrupt, lying hypocrites; the problems is—their constituents don’t seem to care.

Seems like Democrats are afraid that Americans are going to interfere with the 2020 election.

When you see the word “social” before a word, it usually makes that word mean the exact opposite of what it was originally intended to mean.

If Donald Trump did all the things he is accused of, he could run as a Democrat.

This just in: Ukraine has launched an investigation to see if Democrats have any ties to the United States.

“Conservatives’ biggest mistake was handing over the school system to the Left. College campuses today are literally Leftist indoctrination camps.” – Candace Owens, black female conservative activist

After Rutgers University professor of Education Catherine Lugg took to social media and accused the GOP and Fox News of being “existential threats” to the United States, she tweeted that gun rights advocates are “gun/Moloch worshippers” belonging to a “death cult.” Her brazen condemnation of anyone with a conservative or biblical worldview on social issues are not only reflected in her teachings, but in her Twitter posts. Typical of college professors these days.

“When people like [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi and [Democratic presidential candidate] Pete Buttigieg say it’s un-Christian not to have open borders or socialism, I think they’re perverting the Gospel.” – Jerry Falwell, Jr., Epoch Times

A light at the end of the tunnel: Only 5 more years of impeachment hearings left.

Donald Trump to Americans: “They’re not after me. They’re after you. I’m just in their way.”

If Democrats knew the illegal immigrants were voting Republican, you could see the border wall from space! – PP

“Politics and morality are inseparable. And as morality’s foundation is religion, religion and politics are necessarily related. We need religion as a guide. We need it because we are imperfect, and our government needs the church, because only those humble enough to admit they’re sinners can bring to democracy the tolerance it requires in order to survive.” – Ronald Reagan

Theological confusion has permitted us first to decide what we want and then build a theology that justifies it.

Why Leftists hate the Constitution: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”  – John Adams


Men, Women and Equality in the Creation Marriage Model

EVANGELICAL FEMINISTS (E/Fs herein) OFTEN ASSERT THAT IN CREATION God made man and woman co-equal partners in every way, without distinction in either role or authority. The only differences were the obvious physical dissimilarities. They were mutually submissive and shared total equality. They insist that Adam did not possess authority in that relationship before the Fall. Only after they sinned was Adam given ruling status. They then suggest that in the current Christian conversion experience the judgment granting Adam’s authority is reversed and the husband/wife relationship is returned to the former pre-Fall conditions, featuring mutual submission and full co-equal status and authority.

Does that scenario fit with the Genesis creation narrative? Do the New Testament authors confirm this arrangement? What does the creation model in Genesis teach us about those first two humans and their relationship? Was it truly co-equal in authority? Did the Fall of Adam and Eve and their expulsion from the Garden result in male authority to later be erased by Christian conversion?

The reshaping of the American mind

The cultural revolution that exploded in the 1960s was the product of a century of seething change in the Western nations. In retrospect, major societal modifications were inevitable, spurred by the economies of several nations, two world wars, and growing religious movements. Inherent were the crucial changes that would come in the home and workplaces of those nations, America in particular.

Liberation movements flourished during the last half of the 20th century, none growing faster or becoming more impacting than the……

… [to continue reading this article, click the link below.]

Men, Women, Equality in Creation


Win them with this…

Into His Marvelous Light Bible Study

IHMLCoverNo other one-hour Bible study has enjoyed the consistent results of IHML over the years. Often copied but never duplicated. It is attractive, well written, and doctrinally sound. It will convince any open-minded person (and some whose minds are not so open) that the new birth is absolutely essential and that Acts 2:38 constitutes that experience. It’s possible that more souls have been won with this Bible Study than with any other single evangelism tool in the past 28 years. Discover how easy it is to share the plan of salvation with others. Available in both English and Spanish. English is available in both KJV and NIV84.

AM Price 1-49 $1.75 each;  50-99 $1.50 each; 100 or more $1.25 each.

Help establish them with this…

Guide For LivingIHML_GFL_Revised

A follow-up study for the new convert. This little booklet is given to the new convert to go through alone, filling in the blanks, and then bring back to you with any questions they may have. It covers the new birth—what has happened to them experientially—and goes through what their responsibilities as new believers are now.

AM Price 1-49 $1.75 each;  50-99 $1.50 each; 100 or more $1.25 each.

 Order at advanceministries.org/store or call 936-537-0250



The Last Words

As the radical leftist Saul Alinsky [a hero of Obama and Hillary Clinton] stated, “It is necessary to hide the true purposes of a movement and mobilize people on a large scale to act in support of local, temporary, plausible, or benign goals.”

Please change my email address to  jrensey1@gmail.com. Thanks! Have a great month!


Published in: on February 1, 2020 at 2:25 AM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey blog for January, 2020

Happy New Year! Welcome to the January 2020 blog. Please note the change of email address for JREnsey. Please use jrensey1@gmail.com for all personal communication. Thanks!


The Word for Today

“For wives, this means submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23 For a husband is the head of his wife as Christ is the head of the church. He is the Savior of his body, the church. 24 As the church submits to Christ, so you wives should submit to your husbands in everything. 25 For husbands, this means love your wives, just as Christ loved the church. He gave up his life for her 26 to make her holy and clean, washed by the cleansing of God’s word.[a] 27 He did this to present her to himself as a glorious church without a spot or wrinkle or any other blemish. Instead, she will be holy and without fault” (Ephesians 5:22-27 NLT).


The doctor “made a mistake”

Terry Beatley, founder and president of Hosea Initiative, a pro-life organization, recently gave President Trump the “Courageous Witness for Life Award.” She said the organization selected Trump for his “courage to be able to stand up for the right thing.”

Beatley was inspired by her 2009 interview with Dr. Bernard N. Nathanson (left), an American medical doctor who was once known as “The Abortion King.” Nathanson later said he “made a mistake” in leading the pro-abortion cause and became a prominent opponent of the procedure. Two years before his death in 2011, the doctor told Beatley that he misled American public opinion in the 1970s about abortion, promoting it as “women’s health care.” [Let that sink in.]

According to Beatley’s book, Nathanson claimed responsibility for the death of more than 75,000 pre-born babies, including two of his own unborn children. A few months after the Roe v. Wade decision, a new technology, ultrasound, transformed his views on abortion.

“The bombshell was real-time ultrasound. It made everything come alive,” he told Beatley. “I finally came to the conviction that this was my patient. This was a person. I was a physician, pledged to save my patients’ lives, not destroy them. So, I changed my mind on the subject of abortion.”

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Dr. Ben Carson, accepted the award for the President. Speaking at the event, Carson praised pro-life advocates for their courage. He said as a former neurosurgeon, he spent a lot of time working on babies, even premature babies born between 25 and 27 weeks, and “operating all night trying to save their lives. That’s why no one will ever convince me that what’s in a mother’s womb is a meaningless bunch of cells,” he said.  – Report by Emel Akan, The Epoch Times


Was the Codex Sinaiticus, dated to the early fourth century, actually a forgery?

Some claim that this important early manuscript containing almost all of both biblical testaments, was a 19th century forgery accomplished by a man called Simonides. He claimed he wrote the manuscript when he was 19 years old while residing at Mt. Athos in northern Greece. Although he was discredited as either a liar or delusional at the time, some have recently revived his claim because, if true, it would potentially negate the position that the manuscript, which has earlier readings than the Textus Receptus/KJV, is older and likely to read more like the autographs.

I researched this claim a few years ago and dismissed it out of hand as entirely ludicrous. Since others have already published rebuttals of the claim, let me lean on another well known researcher of biblical texts, James Snapp, Jr. He provides twenty facts that prove Sinaiticus was not a forgery and certainly not the work of Simonides. To see his work, click on the links below (each site has 10 reasons):




The search for perfection

Mark Galli, the editor of Christianity Today has railed against the President’s morality, suggesting that he should be put out of office. Evidently, he sided with Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats in the House of Representatives during the impeachment process. Perhaps he will come out for Pelosi for President, or perhaps Adam Schiff who led the impeachment effort. Or he may opt for Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, or even Pete Buttigieg, the current gay mayor of South Bend, IN. Will he support one of them for president? Surely one of them has a spotless past.

If he had been living in 1790, would he have condemned President George Washington for owning slaves? He surely would have castigated later presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Dwight D. Eisenhower for their extra-marital dalliances. Would he have called for the resignation of John F. Kennedy who was known for the stream of young women brought to the White House for his “comfort”? Galli was editor during the Obama administration. We can only assume that he overlooked the many “inaccuracies” Obama told publicly and his background connections with communism. Did Galli ever write an editorial condemning Obama or Clinton for their stand on abortion and homosexuality? The numerous ethical violations and governmental corruption of Obama and Biden must have been considered mere “oversights” by Mr. Galli. If he is into condemning office holders for their peccadillos and moral failures, we should look for a long editorial in the next issue. We can only assume that he has not excoriated Mayor Pete is because he is plugged into political correctness. The mayor’s type of immoral conduct is apparently off limits, even by some Christian editors.

No one is justifying Trump for anything he has done in his past. Everyone winced when some of his actions were disclosed. He will go to judgment for any unforgiven sins he may have committed. However, if we are looking for someone with experience and a spotless moral or ethical record to serve in a non-religious political position, we may be looking for a long time.

The Innocents?

We’ve all known for a long time that Mark Galli, CT’s editor was liberal to the core. He evidently supposes he represents Evangelicalism in America. For a glimpse of what he really believes and what he thinks of the God of the Bible, visit the website below and read his article where he casts God as a Divine Drama Queen.



What else do these candidates have up their sleeves?

Openly gay mayor Pete Buttigieg (center top above), Democrat running for the presidency, has promised to legalize drug possession across the board. Wow, what a blessing that would be! Reckon whose votes he is fishing for? According to Fox News, the sheriff of Polk County, FL comments, “He is guaranteeing more drug addicts, he’s guaranteeing more crime, and he’s guaranteeing less help because we don’t have enough services for those who are addicted to crimes now and he’s going to create more addiction.” He also promises to reduce deportations. His policies will spur economic growth, he says. Increasing the number of drug dealers, thieves, and illegals will definitely spur the economy—in a number of Latin American countries whose economies depend in part on drug production and sales.

We didn’t know that until he said it publicly. What else do we not know that they are secretly planning to foist onto the American people? We know what the man who is in the office now will likely do. He keeps his promises. He is not perfect, but is probably as transparent as a president can be.


Is “mutual submission” in marriage conveyed in Ephesians 5:21-25?

These verses are a focus of egalitarian writers today who have embraced the concept of gender equality at all levels of Christian life. Do they really teach mutual submission of husband and wife or are they misinterpreted by a flawed hermeneutic?

If the mutual submission of husband and wife is truly a biblical principle being expressed in v. 21, how did it escape most of the textual exegetes who have closely examined the Scriptures for the last two millennia? After checking with many of the often quoted Protestant commentators[1] of the last two hundred years, none appear cognizant of this principle. In other words, it is a recent concept.

In Christian circles, contemporary egalitarian authors like Letha Scanzoni, Paul Jewett and Craig Keener are often quoted by those leading the charge for cultural change. Keener focuses on Ephesians 5:21 to insist that it includes the relationship of husbands and wives in the mutual submission principle. Is that what the apostle Paul is teaching in this verse or is it merely being used as a prop for a larger agenda?

Different types or levels of submission

The target of Paul’s words in verses 19-21 is the body of Christ as a whole. All Christians, male and female, defer to one another in ways that maintain unity and harmony in that setting. More specific types of submission are the focus of vv. 22-25. As Wiersbe points out, the submission Paul speaks of in v. 21 “has nothing to do with the order of authority, but rather governs the operation of authority. …Often Jesus tried to teach His disciples not to throw their weight around, or seek to become great at someone else’s expense. Unfortunately, they failed to learn the lesson, and even at the Last Supper they were arguing over who was the greatest (Luke 22:24-26). When Jesus washed their feet, He taught them that the greatest is the person who uses his authority to build up people, and not, like the Pharisees, to build up his own authority and make himself important. We are to esteem others more important than ourselves (Romans 12:10; Philippians 2:1-4).”[2]

Verse 21 addresses a general submission by all members of the body of Christ to each other to ensure unity and harmony. It acts as an introductory sentence to the more specific areas mentioned in the next verse, where submission is a factor in the relationships of husband and wife, children and parents, and slaves and masters. In those relationships, a submission is called for that emulates that of the church to its Head (authority), which is Christ: “Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore, as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing” [sic – KJV] (vv. 22-24; Titus 2:5). There is no mutual submission suggested in these three areas or of Christ and the church. The order and line of authority descends from God through Christ to man to woman: “But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God” (I Corinthians 11:3).[3]

There is submission both in v. 21 and in v. 22, but of different types. One is reciprocated and the other is unrequited in kind. That in v. 21 is marked by reciprocity which does not appear in v. 22. Both husband and wife submit, but the wife’s submission is to her husband, and the husband’s is to the principle of selfless love of v. 25. The wife is to submit to her husband, but the husband is not told to submit to his wife.[4] Again, there is no correlative mutual submission in Paul’s four illustrations: husbands/wives, parents/children, slaves/masters, Christ/the church. Otherwise, total confusion would ensue.

How can a husband and wife live in harmony with both having equal authority? It would be a standoff and both would be in their right. Confusion would result. Someone has to be in charge. That which is two-headed is usually considered an anomaly or unnatural. There is no clear analogy in either Testament of mutual submission that can be applied to husbands and wives.

Some attempt to tie v. 22 to the submission command of v. 21 because the verb “submit” does not appear in the Greek in v. 22 but is “borrowed” by the presumption of Greek grammar from v. 21. This grammatical insertion changes nothing.

Misquoting the Scriptures

According to Keener, “Sometimes Paul gets a bad rap. The slave narratives are replete with sentiments from former slaves who loved Jesus but hated Paul, because slaveholders regularly quoted Ephesians 6:5, “Slaves, obey your masters.” What the slaveholders didn’t bother to quote was the rest of the passage, which goes on to say, “masters, do the same things to them” (6:9). That is, if slaves have to obey their masters, masters must also obey their slaves.”[5] Virtually anyone can see that the passage does not say that masters are to obey their slaves. That would be quite problematic. Masters were to treat their servants according to the principles laid down in vv. 20-21. The thrust of the passage is that masters manifest the same spirit of heartfelt sincerity and humility, treating their slaves/servants with respect and dignity as a brother in Christ, but it does not say that masters must obey their slaves. This amounts to a manipulation of the language, subjecting it to his own assumptions and presuppositions.

Keener doesn’t give up: “Moreover, he never instructs the male householder to rule; instead, he is to love his wife, serving her by offering his life for her (5:25), to avoid provoking his children (6:4), and to treat slaves as fellow servants of God (6:9).” Has he never read I Timothy 3:12: “Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well”? (Italics mine) It seems best to follow Paul’s advice and ignore the secular humanists and radical egalitarians, else we could find ourselves slouching toward serious theological error.

The idea of the mutual submission of husband and wife can be made to sound so kind, so relevant, so thoughtful and reasonable as to make one think if it is not actually expressed in Scripture it should have been. Are some Apostolics picking up this concept from the secular sociologists, the media, and the feminist authors who are trying to coerce us to bow to the god of political correctness? Paul’s admonitions may not find acceptance with the social philosophers of the 21st century, but popular human reason cannot be placed above the authority of the Word of God. Perhaps we have sat at their feet so long and been indoctrinated with how pagans and Christian liberals conceive of Christianity that we are beginning to think like them. Have we become so enamored with letters behind our names that we now believe that all who have many of them are smarter in all ways than any who have fewer or none?

(For those who need more supporting references, I suggest they turn to Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones who published Life In the Spirit In Marriage, Home and Work: An exposition of Ephesians 5:18-6:9, pages 85-86.)

The source of this concept

Where did this concept of “mutual submission” of husband and wife originate? In the ever-darkening minds of modern secular humanists and sociologists? In the bowels of Berkeley, Columbia, and Harvard? In the glass-enclosed, downtown highrises where the media monsters lurk? In the hot-button books of the pop psychologists so faddish in the last half of the 20th century? In the 1960s cultural revolution that brought the Women’s Liberation Movement to the forefront in England and America? All may have had a part in the meteoric rise of this idee fixe among current sociologists and liberal Christian authors.

Early secular feminists were inclined to dismiss the Bible entirely and take their cues from contemporary sociologists. “Progressive” Christians, however, were hesitant to go that far. Too many American women were still conservative church goers. So they began to cast their lot with new Bible interpreters like R. T. France, David Thompson, and I. Howard Marshall who promote the idea that the Gospels gave Christianity a good start, but the faith has been sort of “unfolding” since then. Therefore, we know more today, we are more educated, and our understanding of ethics and morality are set in a more equitable light than that of the apostles. They suggest that a “fuller outworking of God’s purpose” is being captured today by modern thinkers. They propose fundamentally equalizing the roles of men and women, husbands and wives. They posit that Pauline admonitions were good for that time period, but new perspectives update Christianity and make it relevant to our time. These “progressive” new perspectives include the dismissal of the traditional complementarian view of women’s roles in favor of a more radical egalitarianism.[6]

These “progressive” ideas are espoused by Christian feminist authors Letha Scanzoni and Nancy Hardesty who are emboldened to say Paul was wrong. His admonitions about female subordination in marriage were simply unresolved holdovers from his former rabbinic training. His references to passages in Genesis reflected contemporary understanding and the way they were interpreted “in his day.” Therefore, since Paul’s statements were based on misguided Jewish concepts current at that time, and were inconsistent with other NT passages, we are not obligated to obey the apostle’s commands regarding husbands and wives.[7]

A new hermeneutic?

A word about hermeneutics. Should we employ “Pentecostal” hermeneutics or Baptist hermeneutics or some other religious tradition’s hermeneutics to interpret Scripture instead of standard “biblical” hermeneutics? To do so could bring pressure on leaders to accept theological error merely to accommodate whatever is already is being done by prominent pastors. In throwing a grid of Penteccostal hermeneutics over the Bible, we could possibly find ourselves in doctrinal error along the way, depending on what stripe of “Pentecostal” created the grid.

The modernists’ “trajectory hermeneutic” suggests that the commands Paul gave in the first century need not be followed today. Gender equality advocate R. T. France proposes this approach: “The gospels do not, perhaps, record a total reversal of Jewish prejudice against women and of their total exclusion from roles of leadership. But they do contain the seeds from which such a reversal was bound to grow. Effective revolutions are seldom completed in a year or two. In this, as in other matters, the disciples were slow learners. But the fuse, long as it might prove to be, has been ignited.”[8] Fellow egalitarian, I. Howard Marshall adds, “Paul wrote as he did about marriage because in his world he did not know any other form than the patriarchal. As he did with other relationships, he worked within the structures of his time and gave directions for Christian behavior within them. The danger is to think that this validates the setup for all time.”[9] Ah, now we see the plan—today other moral standards (read: ours) apply. Paul’s statements applied to his time, but our more erudite, educated and more ethical understanding is the way for today. I trow not.

Do Paul’s statements give husbands the right to mistreat or abuse their wives as some may have assumed? Absolutely not. Tyrants are not countenanced in the Scriptures. There are other verses which make that abundantly clear (I Peter 3:7; Colossians 3:19; et al). Deferment is included in love. A husband must recognize that there are times he should defer to his wife’s needs, wishes, abilities and ideas. This does not usurp his ultimate leadership. In the case of slaves, the same is true. Masters were enjoined to treat them as Christian brothers (see the Book of Philemon). Nor does it allow for child abuse, although there is no mutual submission directive for parent/child relationships. Additionally, there is no hint in these or other verses of a husband’s superiority or a wife’s inferiority. All persons are of equal value and worth in the sight of God. That being said, there is no justification for expanding the scope of the Scriptures merely to condemn selfish or violent acts.


The happiest couples are those who follow scriptural directives. Aside from the fact that such admonitions are “commandments of the Lord” (I Corinthians 14:37), they are actually stress relievers. Much of the pressure and stress on contemporary marriages has evolved from the departure from biblical principles. God’s way is always the better way, the happiest way, and the less stressful way.

Let me conclude with a thoughtful observation lifted from Barnes Notes on the Bible: “Submitting yourselves one to another – Maintaining due subordination in the various relations of life. This general principle of religion, the apostle proceeds now to illustrate in reference to wives Ephesians 5:22-24; to children Ephesians 6:1-3; and to servants, Ephesians 6:5-8. At the same time that he enforces this duty of submission, however, he enjoins on others to use their authority in a proper manner, and gives solemn injunctions that there should be no abuse of power. Particularly he enjoins on husbands the duty of loving their wives with all tenderness Ephesians 5:25-33; on fathers, the duty of treating their children so that they might easily obey them Ephesians 6:4; and on masters, the duly of treating their servants with kindness, remembering that they have a Master also in heaven; Ephesians 6:9. The general meaning here is, that Christianity does not break up the relations of life, and produce disorder, lawlessness, and insubordination; but that it will confirm every proper authority, and make every just yoke lighter. Infidelity is always disorganizing; Christianity, never.”[10]


[1] In the commentaries listed at Biblos.com, including Clarke, Poole, Pulpit, Jamieson-Fausset-Brown, Ellicott, Barnes, Expositors, etc., etc., I found no principle of mutual submission of husband and wife extracted from these verses in Ephesians 5. One would assume if the concept mutual submission of husband and wife was apparent in Paul’s admonitions, some of them would have caught it. Obviously, it is a recent idea, concocted to support the new perspectives regarding male and female relationships.
[2] Warren Wiersbe, The Bible Exposition Commentary (Colorado Springs: Cook Comm. Ministries, 1989), p. 50.
[3] One should not assume from this that every woman is to submit to every man, even strangers, “in everything.” The principle is being applied here only to the marriage relationship.
[4] There is deferment and agreement along the way in any relationship. No one is absolutely right all the time, in every case. However, this does not alter the basic principle, oft repeated in the Epistles, of wives’ submission to their husbands.
[5] Craig Keener quotes in this article are found in https://www.cbeinternational.org/blogs/case-mutual-submission-ephesians-5. Keener lamely concedes that “there is much less mutual submission in the instruction to fathers: children do need guidance.”
[6] Galatians 3:28 has been called upon by gender equality advocates to prove that gender is no longer a factor in the kingdom of God. We shall deal with that topic in another setting. I Corinthians 7:3-5 has also been used in the discussion, but one can see that the passage there is dealing with the matter of deprivation of sexual fulfillment in marriage, not authority.
[7] These ideas were set forth by Letha Scanzoni and Nancy Hardesty in All We Were Meant To Be: A Biblical Approach to Women’s Liberation (Waco, TX: Word Publishers, 1974), pp. 28,212,213, et al. In What God Hath Joined Together: A Christian Case for Gay Marriage (San Francisco: Harper 2005), Scanzoni would reveal her direction and ultimate goal: God sanctions gay marriage and so should we. One must be careful which path he chooses—where will it lead? She was following the concepts of Fuller Seminary professor Paul Jewett who wrote Man as Male and Female (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975).
[8] Quoted by Wayne Grudem, Evangelical Feminism (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2006), p. 54. Apparently a total reversal of roles, not merely an equalization, is the goal of the more progressive feminists. This is apparent in Barack Obama’s recent statement suggesting that it would be better if females ruled every nation in the world.
[9] Ibid., p. 58.
[10] Barnes Notes on the Bible at the Biblos.com website.


IHML Bible studies are still winning souls after three decades!

Into His Marvelous Light
IHMLCoverAvailable in English, Spanish, German & Italian
No other one-hour Bible study has enjoyed the consistent results of IHML over the years. Often copied but never fully duplicated. It is attractive, well written, and doctrinally sound. Those who are seeking for Availabletruth will see that the new birth is absolutely essential and that Acts 2:38 constitutes that experience. Over 2 million copies sold.

$1.75 ea
$1.50 ea
$1.25 ea


Guide For Living 
IHML_GFL_RevisedA follow-up Study for the new convert. This little booklet can be given to the new convert to go through alone and then come back to you with any questions they may have. It covers the new birth —what has happened to them and goes through what their responsibilities are now.

$1.75 ea
$1.50 ea
$1.25 ea

Promotional Tracts 
pampletsAvailable in English & Spanish
Hand out these tracts to help you promote the Bible study in your community. Available in English and Spanish. It’s easy to get Bible study opportunities with these tracts.  $9.95 per 100

Order all materials shown above from Advanceministries.org/store or call 936-537-0250.


Actual gun used by Democrats in attempted assassination of President Trump via impeachment


Worth repeating

“Our culture has accepted two huge lies. The first is that if you disagree with someone’s lifestyle, you must fear or hate them. The second is that to love someone means you agree with everything they believe or do. Both are nonsense. You don’t have to compromise convictions to be compassionate.” – Rick Warren

“God simplified NT church structure by giving only ONE job opening to every member: SLAVE.” – Raymond Woodward


The Last Words

Breaking news (tic): President Trump to begin deporting Democrats; Mexico announces building of border wall.

I hate spelling errors. You mix up two letters and your whole post is urined. – Patriot Post

Please remember to change my personal email address in your lists to jrensey1@gmail.com.

Enjoy January. Endure February. Spring is not far behind.


Published in: on January 1, 2020 at 1:14 AM  Leave a Comment