JREnsey blog November 2021

Thanks for joining us today! If you like this month’s content, please share it with someone you care about.

The First Word

“The wicked will go down to the grave. This is the fate of all the nations who ignore God” (Psalm 9:17 NLT).


What about those Aramaic and Hebrew words in the NT?

Aramaic, the language of some parts of the Old Testament (portions of Daniel and Ezra), is a sister language of Hebrew. It was the ordinary language of Judea and Galilee in the first century, and it is sometimes called “Hebrew” in the New Testament. Jesus probably could speak some Greek, as there were Greek-speaking cities in Galilee, and He conversed with a Greek-speaking Syrophoenician woman (Mark 7:24-30). Since Jesus mainly taught the common people, though, Aramaic was His language and that of many of the earliest Christians.

Abba……………………………………. Father
akeldama……………………………… “field of blood,” perhaps a proper     name (Acts 1:19)
EIoi, Eloi, lama sabachthani……….“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (Mark 15:34, after Ps. 22:1)
ephphatha……………………………. “Be opened” (Mark 7:34)
korbanas……………………………….. The temple treasury (Matt. 27:6)
mammonas……………….…………… “Mammon,” “riches” (Matt. 6:24)
rnaranatha …………………….……… “Our Lord has come” or “Our Lord, come!” (I Cor. 16:22)
talitha koumi ……………………..….. “Little girl, arise!” (Mark 5:41)
rabbi …………………..……………….. “My Master” or “My great one” (rabboni in John 20:16)
raca ……………………………………… “You fool” (Matt. 5:22)

Other words are actually Hebrew, though transmitted through Aramaic:

Alleluia …………….… “Praise Yahweh”
amen ……………….… “Truly, reliably”
korban ……………….  “Dedicated offering” (Mark 7:11)
pascha …………….…   Passover
geenna ……………….  Gehenna, from gei hinnom, or Valley of Hinnom, the Jerusalem city dump
manna ………………..  Manna, literally, “What is it?”
sabaoth ……………..  From Hebrew meaning “hosts, armies” (Rom. 9:29; James 5:4)
sabbaton ……………  Sabbath
satanas ………………. Satan, or “the adversary”

Source: T. J. McTavish, A Theological Miscellany


Heresies are a good thing?

Some things that appear negative on the surface can actually be positive. I remember a quote by an elder in another denomination who was lamenting their loss of holiness-based living. “Once,” he said, “our negative preaching produced positive results, now our positive preaching is producing negative results.” A minister once told me personally that he didn’t preach against anything. His reason: “There are so many things that I am preaching for that I have no time to preach against things.” A look at his church revealed the fruit of that that approach.

Paul said, “For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you” (I Corinthians 11:19). The ESV renders the verse: “For there must be factions among you in order that those who are genuine among you may be recognized.”

It seems strange that heresy in a church could be a positive development. To achieve that outcome, a pastor would have to handle the situation with wisdom and grace. Paul explains that they can reveal the lovers of truth and the genuine believers. Throughout church history we can see that certain heretics have forced pastors and church leaders to more definitely state their founding principles. Many great theological works were produced by men who would possibly have never done so without the surfacing of false teachers, persons with new “revelations,” and blatant heretics who challenged biblical orthodoxy. A goodly portion of the Epistles was written in response to the rise of heresies. Would we have had those positive teaching otherwise?

While no pastor yearns for a doctrinal division to arise, there will be times when it reveals the truth a little more clearly.


Trinitarians still confused about God

According to LifeWay Research, “almost all evangelicals say they believe in the Trinity (96%) and that Jesus is fully human and fully divine (88%).

“But nearly a quarter (22%) said God the Father is more divine than Jesus, and 9 percent weren’t sure. Further, 16 percent say Jesus was the first creature created by God, while 11 percent were unsure.

“No doubt, phrases like “only begotten Son” (John 3:16) and “firstborn of all creation” (Colossians 1:15) have led others in history to hold these views, too. In the fourth century, a priest from Libya named Arius (c. 250–336) announced, ‘If the Father begat the Son, then he who was begotten had a beginning. …There was a time when the Son was not.’ The idea, known as Arianism, gained wide appeal, even among clergy. But it did not go unopposed. Theologians Alexander and Athanasius of Alexandria, Egypt, argued that Arius denied Christ’s true divinity. Christ is not of similar substance to God, they explained, but of the same substance.

“Believing the debate could split the Roman Empire, Emperor Constantine convened the first ecumenical church council in Nicea in A.D. 325. The council, comprising over 300 bishops, rejected Arianism as heresy and maintained that Jesus shares the same eternal substance with the Father. Orthodoxy struggled to gain popular approval, however, and several heresies revolving around Jesus continued to spread. At the second ecumenical council in Constantinople in 381, church leaders reiterated their condemnation of Arianism and enlarged the Nicene Creed to describe Jesus as ‘the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.’ In other words, the Son is not a created being, nor can he be less divine than the Father.” [end of report]

All of this confusion is resolved in the Apostolic Pentecostal doctrine of the Oneness of God. God is Spirit (John 4:24), and is one in number (Deuteronomy 6:4; Ephesians 4:4-6, et al). The Son existed in God’s plan until He was conceived in the womb of Mary and He became a living reality. He was called the Son of God because He was sired by God (Matthew 1:20,23) and not man. He was never called God the Son or the eternal Son of God. Trinitarians are still puzzled about the identity of the Holy Spirit who is merely God Himself at work in and among His people.

Rejoice, Apostolic readers, that you know and love the truth about God!


Can’t forgive yourself?

We often speak with people who are struggling with forgiving themselves. Many counselors and pastors regularly hear people groan about the inability to “forgive themselves” for failures in their past. If one feels the necessity to do that, it is unlikely he will ever be able to succeed in doing so. They recognize the need to eliminate guilt for certain mistakes and get on with their life, but still beat themselves up daily for their past failures. What should they do about forgiving themselves?

Stop trying.

The problem with this concept is that it is not up to us to generate our own forgiveness. Psychologists who make a living working with people who have adopted the view that they must somehow forgive themselves will rail against this approach as too “simplistic.” The problems people have today are too “complex” for simplistic answers, they say. The main reason people have so many complex problems is that they have ignored the simple answers too long!

Forgiveness is something only someone else can give you. If people forgave themselves, would they feel as motivated to seek forgiveness from God or others? You can no more forgive yourself than you can give something to yourself. We will never stop feeling guilty if we are looking to ourselves for freedom from guilt. In the Christian worldview, the ultimate source of our forgiveness is God Himself. Our faith must grasp the fact that we have truly been forgiven by the One whose death we caused, in part, by our sin.

The solution for guilt is not self-forgiveness but divine forgiveness. If we continue to harbor guilt after we have repented of our sins and been baptized in His name, receiving forgiveness in the process, that is a faith problem—evidence that we have not truly believed God has forgiven us. Once God forgives and we have accepted His forgiveness, the conscience will be quieted. If we have intentionally wronged others, we must seek forgiveness from them, accepting it just as we did God’s forgiveness. If they refuse, that is their problem, not the offender’s. Faith is at work in the process of forgiveness.

At ease. Be free…”thy faith hath made thee whole” (Luke 17:19).


Bible trivia

The most common Bible name is David, which occurs over a thousand times. The longest name in the Bible is that of Isaiah’s son Mahershalalhashbaz. Imagine his mother calling him from play to eat. Supper would get cold in the process.

It is strange that China, the world’s most populous nation, opposes Bible teaching yet it prints more Bibles than any other country.

The Geneva Bible was the first Bible to use numbered verses. It was the Bible used by Shakespeare and other famous authors of the sixteenth and seventeenth century.

The word “girl” or “girls” each occurs only once in the entire KJV. “Boy” or “boys” are mentioned five times, all in the Old Testament.

Over 100 million Bibles are sold each year.

The full Bible has been translated into 532 languages and parts of it into 2,883 languages.

The world’s smallest Bible will fit on the tip of a pen. Scientists etched 1.2 million letters on a tiny silicone disk. It is called the Nano Bible.


Questions you might address in your next Bible lesson

If God loves the world (John 3:16), why can’t we be friends with it (James 4:4)?

If God loves the world, why does the Bible say He hates “all workers of iniquity” (Psalm 5:5)?

Does the Bible approve of assassinations (Judges 3:15-21)?

What did Jesus mean when He said believers are to “eat His flesh” and “drink His blood” (John 6:53,54)?

Can angels reproduce with humans? Would their offspring be part angel? Would all of them be giants? (Genesis 6:1,2)

Should Christians celebrate Halloween? The most popular Halloween costume this year was a witch. What is a witch, really?

How should this scripture be applied: “[T]hose who make plans without consulting me, who form alliances without consulting my Spirit, and thereby compound their sin” (Isaiah 30:1 NET).


Do we need an “indigenous peoples” day?

When a culture decides to cancel truth and publish lies they are on their way to a new dark age. The idiocy that wants to cancel Columbus in favor of honoring the indigenous people of the Americas is a fungus among us.

Doug Kutilek shared the following in a recent edition of his online newsletter As I See It:

“So Columbus is now ‘the bad guy’ and the ‘indigenous peoples’ of the islands of the Caribbean were the ‘good guys’? Just what kind of people did Columbus find there in 1492?  According to Encyclopedia Britannica, 1992 printing of the 15th edition, volume 2, p. 866, column 2:

‘The Island Carib, who were warlike (and allegedly cannibalistic) were immigrants from the mainland who, after driving the Arawak from the lesser Antilles [emphasis added] were expanding when the Spanish arrived…. Raids upon other peoples provided women who were kept as slave-wives; the male captives were tortured and killed.’

“Nice folks those Caribs—cannibals and invaders who displaced the previous ‘indigenous’ island inhabitants, kidnapped and enslaved for sexual gratification women from other peoples, and after torturing the captive men, murdered them. Excellent role models, people to be lionized and celebrated. Let’s give them their own day, shall we?” [end quotation]

Here’s more history that the woke folk are missing:

Confederate General Robert E. Lee, although the leader of the army that was beaten in the Civil War, he became a voice for national reconciliation following the war. “It is pleasant to know that mostly through General Lee’s influence, the fires of sectional hatred that burned so fiercely during the [American Civil] War and more fiercely, if possible, during Reconstruction years, have almost entirely died out.” – Quoted from Lexington in Old Virginia by Henry Boley (1936), p. 124.


Putin watches collapse of American values

The Russian president rails against the concept of “gender fluidity” and Western culture in general. He labels transgenderism as a “crime against humanity.”


Newsers: “The leader of Russia, where same-sex marriage was banned earlier this year, said the idea of children being ‘taught that a boy can become a girl and vice versa’ is ‘monstrous’ and ‘verges on crimes against humanity under the banner of progress,’ per the Moscow Times. He also suggested that supporters of transgender rights were calling for an end to ‘basic things such as mother, father, family or gender differences,’ per the Post. ‘People who dare to say that men and women still exist as a biological fact are almost ostracized,’ he added—perhaps in reference to Dave Chappelle’s recent controversy.

“Tatiana Stanovaya, an expert in Russian politics, said the speech was meant to appeal to ‘hardcore conservatives and supporters of traditional values,’ per the Post. ‘This ideological spin, which is becoming more and more official and concrete, is the main aid to repressions, much stronger than any election.’ Putin said ‘opposing racism is a necessary and noble thing,’ but “the struggle for equality and against discrimination turns into aggressive dogmatism verging on absurdity’ in the West. ‘Here in Russia the absolute majority of our citizens don’t care what color a person’s skin is.'”

Russia’s prophecy that communists”won’t have to fire a shot” appears to be coming to pass.



Better Than The Angels   (eBook)

by E. L. Holley Here are the late E. L. Holley’s own teaching notes on the Book of Hebrews. His unique insight will provide a perspective that will shed new light on difficult passages. The material is clear, candid, and convincing. It has been winnowed so that the reader receives only the whole kernel, the heart of the matter and the real meaning that the author wanted to convey. The power of brevity is at work in these lines. E. L. Holley was respected for his communication skills, his grasp of the Scriptures, and his insight into human nature that few have possessed. You will enjoy sitting at his feet and learning as he opens up the mysteries of Hebrews.

AM Price $4.99

In The Presence of His Glory

by E. L. Holley
James, Peter, John and Jude were outstanding men of God in the NT church. They wrote insightful, hard-hitting epistles to their fellow Christians. Their words have been preserved because they are as relevant today as when they were composed in the first century. E. L. Holley walks us through these NT letters verse by verse with salient comments and insights. It is as if he was looking over their shoulder as they wrote. This new exposition of the General Epistles by a master teacher will be a welcome addition to any minister’s library. This was a portion of the Scriptures he dearly loved to teach from. You will love them more than ever also after you have been guided through them by Brother Holley. No minister or Sunday school teacher should be without these valuable lessons from a genuine wordsmith of our time.

AM Price $9.95

The Best of E. L. Holley   (eBook)

Compiled by J. R. Ensey
E. L. Holley was a man of unique abilities. An astute observer of human nature, he could communicate truth in an inimitable style that you could never forget. His ministry touched the lives of thousands of people over the years. Here are dozens of some of the best articles he left with us.

AM price $9.95

To order books:   click on the title or call 936-537-0250


The way it is


Last Word

Thanks for being a reader and sharing the blog with family and friends you think may find it informative and helpful.

Before you sign off, note that below we have added a section regarding the latest findings about the pandemic, the vaccines, and the resultant political fallout. This is an extremely important matter for our nation and our church. If you are interested, please take a few minutes and check out the info and links below. Folks should make up their own mind about vaccinations but should not fail to inform themselves before doing so.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. You may send them to  jrensey1@gmail.com

Blessings…enjoy the gorgeous foliage of the wonderful month of November!



You may want to read this before you are vaccinated:


More dying in Taiwan after receiving vaccine than from Covid:





Full meeting. Kirsch’s 3:40 min talk goes from 4:20:12 to 4:23:55.

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee – 9/17/2021 – YouTube

Kirsch’s 3:40 min talk isolated on Rumble:


New evidence showing harmfulness of Corona vaccinations presented to International Criminal Court:

An independent Dutch Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry set up in 2020, has new evidence it presented to the International Criminal Court in The Hague about the harmfulness of the Corona vaccinations.

Read more


Latest official figures from VAERS on problems, including deaths, from vaccinations:

818,042 Adverse Events

127,641 Doctor Visits

83,412 Hospitalizations

92,017 Urgent Care

26,199 Disabled

10,179 Bell’s Palsy

10,304 Myocarditis

8,408 Heart Attacks

2,631 Miscarriages

17,128 Deaths

Safe and effective?



Medical tyranny on display

Hospital executives caught on tape colluding to deny Covid patients their rights and the care that they need. It is more about the money than your health. This is what we can expect with single payer government health care.



No stopping place

The CDC Director Rochelle Walensky has said that the definition of “fully vaccinated” may have to be updated as more “boosters” come along. The power this process has given the pinkos in our government is so inebriating that they do not intend to give it up. If previously vaccinated folks do not get the booster shot, they will be counted as “not fully vaccinated.”  https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-director-may-definition-fully-160647231.html

What if pastors established a similar system to say that one must pray through daily or at least weekly to be counted as “fully filled” with the Holy Spirit? Think that would fly?


More dying in Taiwan after receiving vaccine than from Covid.




Your kids are now the guinea pigs

FDA panel backs Pfizer’s shots for kids: “We’re never going to learn how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.”



Why you can’t believe everything your government or the press tells you

UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ “A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.

Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.

He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.”

Did this 1989 prophecy come to pass? Noooooo…..but accuracy and scientific truth were not the object of the report. It was to scare politicians into voting for left-wing policies that are now destroying this nation! The ones spouting this stupidity don’t believe it either. Both Barack Obama and Al Gore, globalist leaders of “the sky is falling” movement, recently bought big houses on the east coast and west coast beaches. It’s not about science, but about bringing America to her knees and being in total control of every person’s life.

Earth Day prophecies are dime a dozen about the demise of civilization via pollution from America’s industries. It is all said to encourage nationalization of those industries like the communist countries have done.

Last year, AOC predicted that we now have a 12-year window in which to solve the global climate crisis or it will end the world. Whoever believes that deserves her as their representative in Congress.


Published in: on November 1, 2021 at 12:26 AM  Leave a Comment  

JREnsey Mid-Month October 2021 blog

Welcome…check out what the words “Go…stand…speak” meant to the apostles in Jerusalem.

The First Word

“But that it spread no further among the people, let us straitly threaten them, that they speak henceforth to no man in this name. And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus. But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye…Then the high priest rose up, and all they that were with him, (which is the sect of the Sadducees,) and were filled with indignation, And laid their hands on the apostles, and put them in the common prison. But the angel of the Lord by night opened the prison doors, and brought them forth, and said,  Go, stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life” (Acts 4:17-19; 5:17-20).


Looking Back To See Ahead

I Samuel 7:12 – “Then Samuel took a stone, and set it between Mizpeh and Shen, and called the name of it Ebenezer, saying, Hitherto hath the Lord helped us” (I Samuel 7:12).

Ebenezer: “A stone of help…a stone marker of some kind to commemorate a moment in time when the Lord’s help made a difference.”

Strength for today often comes from what occurred in some distant yesterday. The crush of day-to-day living sometimes keeps us from remembering what took place in the past. We struggle with our faith regarding what is happening at the present.

The Bible encourages us to build some Ebenezers at places when God intervened in our life and brought a deliverance, a healing, a provision. Rather than just thank God and move on, you should erect a marker in your memory and write it down that on this day God helped you. Then when the pressures and negative events of today drag you down and you don’t know where to turn, be lifted up by looking back to see ahead! Look back to a time when the Lord came to your rescue. That memory will increase your faith, brace your trust, and give you a clearer view of the road ahead. It will also provide a testimony to your children and grandchildren when you tell them of the events in your life that made a difference. (See Deuteronomy 6:20-25.)

In sixty-five years of ministry, I have had to look back to see ahead many times. Some Ebenezers back there encourage me when I need a lift. It may also work for you.


Makng A Difference: A single woman brings down communism

Life becomes overwhelming at times and leaves us wondering if what we are doing will make a difference in the world in which we live. That is when you want to remember people like Lech Walesa, M. L. King, Jr., and Rosa Parks, among others.

When communism imported from Russia had darkened the post-WW2 nation of Poland, they cried out for someone to speak for them. It happened that such a person was a dock worker in the northern city of Gdansk. Lech Walesa was an unlikely deliverer, but deliverers often come from unlikely places and backgrounds. He had the courage to speak out when it was not popular to do so. News outlets from around the world picked up his voice and actions and he became a power in Poland that the Communists didn’t know how to handle. A dissident, he led the Solidarity movement and ultimately became Poland’s President. He guided the change from communism in his nation and Western Europe to forms of democracy. He said his inspiration came from Martin Luther King, Jr.

King was active in speaking out against discrimination and racial segregation. He became a powerful person in achieving the overthrow of Jim Crow laws and getting passed the legislation that made a difference in the lives of many black Americans. His inspiration, he said, came from the example of Rosa Parks.

Parks was a little church-going lady in Montgomery, AL who one day refused to sit in the back of the bus. That simple act basically kicked off the civil rights movement of the 1960s. It took courage to do what she did, although it may seem such an insignificant act looking back from today.

So, in a way, Rosa Park’s decision to buck the tide and stand against the local authorities, led to the fall of communism in Europe. Don’t ever say that what you do will not matter. You never know how God might use your determination in helping America escape the iron fist of tyranny, and determine how the gospel is proclaimed around the world in the future.



Following the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2, when God had begun to confirm His Word with signs following (Mark 16:20), the Jewish authorities set out to stop the new Christian movement. In Acts 5:17-18 we are told they put the apostles in prison for disobeying their orders to not preach using the name of Jesus as their authority (Acts 4:17; 5:17,18). But that night the angel of the Lord came and freed them. They then got their orders directly from God through the angel: “Go, stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life” (Acts 5:19).

Wouldn’t that be a violation of the principle which Paul would later outline in Romans 13:1-7 and/or Titus 3:1. Yes, it would. But that is exactly what they were told to do. When two principles seem to clash, which is to be chosen? The higher of the two should supersede.[1] When leaders are doing the right thing, avoiding corruption, and judging fairly, they are to be obeyed and respected. But when such behavior is not the case, and they are violating God’s laws, which represent the higher principle, we are not required to submit to every mandate of ungodly authorities. That word came directly from the angel of the Lord: “Go…stand… speak.” Therefore, the answer of the apostles to the authorities was: “But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. (Acts 4:19,20).

The attitude that seems to be most common among Christians in America today is, “Just pray. Those in authority are put there by God and we are obligated to obey them. Doesn’t the Romans 13 passage indicate that whoever is in authority has been placed there by the Lord? Let Him handle things. Just wait. Submit. Perhaps God will elevate someone, at some time in the future, who will be more accommodating to Christians.” Is that the approach of God’s people in the Bible? Is that the path the apostles chose? Is that an interpretation of Scripture that…..[Click here to continue reading this article]


DO NOT READ THE REMAINDER OF THIS BLOG…unless you are committed to preserving your freedom to preach and teach the Apostolic gospel in America. These stories may not interest you. However, if you are committed to the premise of “the whole gospel to the whole world,” please click on the links and read/listen to the messages.


“Squad” member admits masking is for “theater”:


Why Life Jackets Should Be Mandatory! – YouTube


How long will Americans put up with this?

Another elderly woman was attacked on the street (see link below). Your opinions, please: How will this wave of terror against our daughters, moms, and sisters be stopped?



Australia’s tracking program

Australia has become the test case for government overreach and authoritarianism and all tyrannical NWO devices. Melbourne, Australia is conducting a pilot tracking program. Random calls from the health dept. are made and they must be answered within five minutes or the gestapo comes after you, and they already know your location. News video:


Patriots in Australia are advising: Leave your phone at home.

Is Australia’s totalitarianism on its way to America?

Here is what Candace Owens says about Australia:

“Looking into what is happening in Australia and I can now confidently say that WW3 is upon us. We are in the midst of a global, psychological warfare. Under the guise of Covid-19, governments worldwide have declared war on their people for full totalitarian control.”


Schools are the new battleground

The most important elections being held in the U.S. right now are for positions on local school boards. Parents who address issues of concern before school boards are dubbed as “terrorists.” Children are being force-fed pornography, transgenderism, corrupted biological science, and twisted history. Parents…please make your voice heard at school board meetings!



A word to our students: You are being trained to be “social justice warriors” for contrived causes that will lead you into a political situation just similar to Communist China. Don’t be misled by teachers who are being forced to regurgitate socialist propaganda in the classroom and in your curriculum.


Huh? Common aspirin found to lower risk of Covid


Doctors are prescribing Ivermectin for Covid but some hospitals are told not to permit it to be administered. Like hydroxychloroquine it works so well that the left stands solidly against it. Isn’t it amazing that one seldom hears of important politicians, particularly leftists, getting the virus? Are they merely spoofing us about being vaxxed? Only one, Rep. Ron Wright, a Texas Republican, is listed as a Covid death. He had also been battling lung cancer.


Did coronaviruses used to be considered a common cold?

It is interesting that in 1989 in the American Medical Association Encyclopedia, coronaviruses were listed as the common cold.


Covid-19 is a lab-enhanced coronavirus, but how many millions of people have tested positive for Covid who merely had a cold or the flu? Isn’t it amazing how few flu cases we had last year?

It is also interesting that we are learning that airline pilots are suddenly dying after being vaccinated. Who knew? Some pilots are now speaking out.


Dismiss all such stories. The President assures us, as do the experts at CNN, that the vaccines are perfectly safe.


They seemed to know what was coming and how to take advantage of it

Seems lots of planning went into this pandemic:

In the video links below, Bright says this on October 29, 2019 at the minute mark 1:29, “There might be a need or even an urgent call for an entity of excitement out there that’s completely disruptive that’s not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes….But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China or somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self-administer.”

Michael Spector, a New Yorker staff writer, said, “Why don’t we blow the system up? I mean obviously we can’t just turn off the spigot on the system we have, and then say hey everyone in the world should get this vaccine that we haven’t given to anyone yet.”

Fauci, “In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true egg growing…to something that has to be much better. You have to prove that this works….that alone, if it works perfectly, is gonna take a decade.”

Yeah, blow up the system, create “an entity of excitement,” shorten the time, get everyone on earth to take an RNA vaccine that never has been used and should take a decade to prove. Why are these people not considered frauds, guilty of many lost lives from the virus and the vaccine? Several other videos have shown that key players, including Fauci and Gates, planned this pandemic and anticipated its potential.

VIDEO: Fauci, Bright, and Dazek Caught Wargaming COVID Virus and mRNA Vaccine Rollout (freeworldnews.tv)

Anthony Fauci, 10/29/2019, “The Quest for a Universal Vaccine”, Milken Institute, just eleven days … – gloria.tv

Event 201, a pandemic exercise to illustrate preparedness efforts (centerforhealthsecurity.org)


Tyranny on display

Want to know what tyranny and a police state sounds like? Canada’s Prime Minister Trudeau announced today that he will place all federal employees on unpaid leave until they’ve been injected with the experimental Covid vaccine and must declare their full ’vaccination status” through an online portal by Oct 29th, going on to say by 30th Oct, all workers and travellers age from 12 years old must show their “vaccination status” or be refused travel! Papers, please.



Doctor removed from hospital after refusing vaccine

Doctors are beginning to speak out at a personal cost to themselves.




If you are struggling with what to do about vaccines…

…you may want to listen to the following interview with a doctor. It and all other information here is not submitted to say I personally know it to be accurate and factual, but to provide a basis for choosing a path to take during this health crisis.



Fauci says we should give up our individual freedoms for what the left perceives as the nation’s “greater good”


Every freedom we have was hard won by men and women who cared about this nation and what it could mean to the future. We should not lay them down so easily when it was a price of blood that bought them for us. Just because a flip-flopping globalist says we must surrender does not mean that it is a good idea. He has earned the mistrust of all Americans.


“Own nothing and be happy.”

Called out, Reuters has denied that the World Economic Forum has said “by 2030 you could own nothing and be happy.” What is the truth?


But that was the essence of input at their latest meeting. Notice their 8 goals for 2030:


I also note that the UN has also said, quoted by Reuters, this enlightening bit of information:

“[T]he United Nation’s ‘Agenda 30’ framework (here and here), which is a set of Sustainable Development Goals devised in 2015 at the United Nations General Assembly (sdgs.un.org/2030agenda). They are freely available on government websites and outline objectives like ending poverty, which includes the goal making property ownership available to all:

“By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance.”

It’s easy to see where the “equity” thing is ultimately headed. To end poverty, certain people have to give what they have earned and/or paid for to someone else. The equity thing is why they are walking out of stores without paying. It is called “leveling the playing field.” “Equal rights to economic resources.” What does that mean except that resources are somehow passed to them without their earning it. It is the old Communist line to take from the haves and give to the have nots. How do the poor get “ownership and control over land and other forms of property” except it is taken from those who have it and given to those who have been too lazy or too unmotivated to earn it. America was built by men and women with personal motivation, a work ethic, and individual sacrifice. “Equity” will change all of that. And whose “inheritance”? Isn’t property ownership available to all now? To whom is it disallowed? Too many of us are not familiar with the old socialist line to recognize what is happening. Too few of comfortable Americans are paying attention!!



Vaccine side effects

A mother in Trinidad tells people about her son dying of blood clots in the head when he got the vaccine. I have read and listened to doctors explain the dangers of the vaccine. I don’t believe everything I read or hear on the Net. But too many have testified to this, and the data seems to back them up. Personal knowledge verifies some of what is said here. The vaccine causes blood clots in many people as it did this boy.

Having had clots myself, I mentioned this to my doctor and he quickly, without another word or prodding, wrote me a letter of exemption from the vaccine.

I would probably be dead right now if I had taken the vaccine. Perhaps that is not true, but it appears quite likely with my medical history and my age. Thousands of others have died after being vaxxed. Heart problems are another side effect of the vaccines. Google key words and many websites will verify these statements.


How fast things can change

A year ago unvaccinated people working the frontlines of health care were “heroes,” now they are “dangerous people”…and “unemployed.” – Arkreadynewsnetwork


Q & A

If fully vaccinated people can spread Covid, why aren’t they losing their jobs too?

Is it because the unvaxxed are the ones the vaxxed ruling class want to become dependent on the state for welfare?

If 60% of those now being hospitalized with Covid have been vaccinated, who are the real domestic “terrorists” and “murderers”?

If vaccination is vital and mandatory for all Americans, why is it not important to insure that those crossing the border are fully vaccinated?



“We have to be more honest about what 9/11 was and what it wasn’t. It was an attack on the hereropatriarchal capitalistic systems that America relies upon to wrangle other countries into passivity. It was an attack on the systems many white Americans fight to protect.”  – Jenn Jackson (a queer genderflux androgynous Black woman, an abolitionist, a lover of all Black people, and an Assistant Professor at Syracuse University in the Department of Political Science, according to her own website).


Digital artists say it like this


The Last Word

“We cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard” (Acts4:20).

Have a blessed day…keep the faith.


[1] For example, wives are told to obey their husbands (I Peter 3:1). However, if a tyrannical husband insists that his wife do that which would violate another clear principle of Scripture, such as demanding that she join him in a drinking binge at the bar, or to participate in some criminal act, she should resist and refrain. She is obligated to obey her husband only to a point.

Published in: on October 16, 2021 at 8:29 PM  Leave a Comment  

JREnsey blog October 2021

Welcome…check out the brief book report on The Holy Trinity!

The First Word

“Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a departing first, and that man of sin be disclosed, even the son of perdition” (II Thessalonians 2:3 The Geneva Bible).


My, how fast things can change

President Biden excoriated Americans for their bad feelings of anger toward Muslims after they took down the twin towers in NYC on 9/11/01, killing about 3,000 persons. After all, he said, they were members of a “peaceful religion.”

Twenty years later the Taliban control Afghanistan, and the Navy Seal who shot Bin Laden is on a no-fly list.


Sugar Daddy: bribery in reverse

The $$$3.5 trillion the President wants to give away to causes, corporations and climate changers amounts to nothing more than government bribery—handing money out to obligate blocks of voters to “support our party’s agenda.” Instead of people bribing government officials, it has flip-flopped.

Scariest: Nearly $79 billion for the IRS. You don’t imagine they would weaponize that agency for political purposes, do you? Then $12 billion for electric cars, $3 billion for “tree equity,” $1 billion to turn government facilities into “high-performance green buildings,” and new funding for gender identity issues and bias training. “He/him” and “she/her” will be eliminated from literary works so we should now say, “Them is going to the store.”

The legislation dishes out another $4 billion for “neighborhood access and equity grants.” So they can turn nice neighborhoods into slummy high-rise “projects”? “Civilian Climate Corps,” which would get at least $7.5 billion across multiple committee budgets. Sounds like the old make-work Civilian Conservation Corps my dad worked for some during the Great Depression. The organization, which President Biden has placed at the top of his climate wish list, would employ thousands of young people to carry out conservation and climate change-related projects on public lands. Think: thousands of little Greta Thunbergs suddenly appearing everywhere wearing scowls and pointing their fingers at violators…like you.

There’s also $5 billion for environmental and “climate justice” block grants given to disadvantaged communities, $1.4 billion in climate change research, and $300 million for the federal government to conduct more efficient and effective environmental reviews by hiring more people and purchasing new equipment, among other measures. In other words, more totalitarian projects to ease us onto the slippery slope into socialism. Billions of dollars will be shifted to organizations that will obligate those groups for years. Pet projects are getting in line for big bucks. For example, someone “outed” that a golf course park near Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco would get a two million dollar gift. Whether mentioned or not, you can believe that Planned Parenthood and BLM would continue to be bankrolled. (See O’Reilly’s column on BLM: https://www.billoreilly.com/b/Bills-Column-on-the-BLM-Organization:-Its-News-to-Us/.) Teachers’ unions and universities receiving grants will be forced to include curricula that promotes the new narrative. Certain “woke” corporations that toe the party line will definitely be “blessed.” You can believe that media corporations will have their hands out…and doubtless they will be filled.

Leftist politicians also slipped in a provision that would give up to $5 million to implement electronic voting systems for union elections. (Perhaps to insure more “equitable” vote counting procedures. What could go wrong there? The bill would give $25 million to nonprofit organizations to develop “anti-discrimination and bias training” for the health care sector, and another $15 million for national resource centers “focused on providing services for older individuals who are underserved due to their sexual orientation or gender identity.”

Finally, Democrats on the Judiciary Committee are promising another $2.8 billion to increase the capacity of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to efficiently adjudicate applications and to reduce case-processing backlogs. Those applications are expected to be created by another part of the bill, which would give lawful permanent residence to certain entrants into the United States.

Hidden and never mentioned is a stipulation on page 168 of 2,465 that any company that has employees that do not comply with Biden’s vaccination mandate can be fined up to $700,000 for each employee.

Get woke or get whacked appears to be the agenda. Or, another way of saying it, “Get left or get left out!”


How to win over tyranny

Report: “General Dynamics Corp. has canceled their vaccine mandate after roughly 40% of their employees (they employ about 100,000 persons) declined the jab & threatened to quit.”

Kudos to GDC employees! Sticking together is the way to win over tyranny.


A number of FDA employees, people who are supposed to know the science involved, have quit over Biden’s vaxx mandates. I also know doctors and nurses on the frontlines in hospitals who are putting themselves in harm’s way every day and I honor and respect them for it. They deserve a hero’s medal. Yet the larger picture must be dealt with so we can get through this pandemic that some are using as a means to overturn the government of this country. Perhaps in the near future the real truth will be plain to all.


God is a [hot space] Rock!?

This just in from the well-educated scientists at the always reliable MSN news organization: Sodom and the other perverted cities were destroyed by a hot space rock! Scientists have even calculated the speed that was measured as it hurled toward earth, and even estimated that the approximate megatonnage that exploded was about 1000 times more powerful than the Hiroshima blast.


You can always trust the folks over at MSN and similar news outlets to get the story straight.


Brief book report: The Holy Trinity

Western Christians are practical modalists, says Presbyterian author.

As Robert Letham observes in his book The Holy Trinity, “For the vast majority of  Christians, including most ministers and theological students, the Trinity is still a mathematical conundrum, full of imposing philosophical jargon, relegated to an obscure alcove, remote from daily life” (p. 1). In 1967, the Roman Catholic theologian Karl Rahner made a now famous comment along similar lines, saying, ‘We must be willing to admit that, should the doctrine of the Trinity have to be dropped as false, the major part of religious literature could well remain virtually unchanged’ (p. 291). This widespread lack of attention to the doctrine of the Trinity has led to serious problems in the church. As an example, most Western Christians today are, in effect, practical modalists (understanding the Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit to be three modes or forms of one divine person) with little or no understanding of the orthodox biblical doctrine of the Trinity (p. 5–6). In The Holy Trinity, Letham seeks to address and correct these problems. – Robert Letham is the senior minister of Emmanuel Orthodox Presbyterian Church in Wilmington, Delaware. Submitted by Pastor Mike Conn.

We’re still waiting on Letham to correct the problems with the Trinity! I fully agree with his assessment that “the Trinity is still a mathematical conundrum, full of imposing philosophical jargon.” He may wind up as Adrian Rogers once prophesied:

“Define the Trinity and you will lose your mind. Deny the Trinity and you will lose your soul.” – Adrian Rogers, late former president of the Southern Baptist Convention; quoted in Pulpit Helps [Think about it…and some call us dogmatic about our doctrines!]


As if we needed another reason

This is especially for those who can’t figure out why the UPCI took a stand against television when it was fairly new, and why anything about it remains in the ministerial Manual:

Some time back NBC aired “The Book of Daniel” as a serious drama [a weekly sitcom] about Christian people and the Christian faith. The main character was Daniel Webster, a drug-addicted Episcopal priest whose wife depends heavily on her mid-day martinis.

Webster regularly sees and talks with a very unconventional white-robed, bearded Jesus. The Webster family is rounded out by a 23-year-old homosexual Republican son, a 16-year-old daughter who is a drug dealer, and a 16-year-old adopted son who is having sex with the bishop’s daughter. At the office, his lesbian secretary is sleeping with his sister-in-law, all the while Daniel’s brother-in-law absconds with the church funds.

NBC and the mainstream media called it “edgy,” “challenging” and “courageous.” [Who would write such a script? Three guesses….] The series is written by Jack Kenny, a practicing homosexual who describes himself as being “in Catholic recovery,” and is interested in Buddhist teachings about reincarnation and isn’t sure exactly how he defines God and/or Jesus. “I don’t necessarily know that all the myth surrounding him (Jesus) is true,” he said.

NBC considered “The Book of Daniel” a positive portrayal of Christ and Christians. – Sources: Wikipedia; AFA online

Since this and similar TV sitcoms and series have firmly embedded such ideas about Christians in the minds of watchers, who can be surprised that what we are seeing in our culture today is merely an expected response? A blind man could have seen where it was headed. But some: “Awwww…it’s just a box…what harm can it do to the family?”


How important is biblical literacy?

A lot of today’s preaching is basically morality presentations drawn from Bible stories. Certainly that has its place. But how much of the real Word of God is going forth? As Thom S. Rainer, writing in Outreach Magazine (“Seven

Sins of Dying Churches”), says, “When only three of one hundred churches even attempt to provide a way for their members to understand Genesis to Revelation, biblical illiteracy is likely to occur. And biblical illiteracy means that our churches may not be obedient to the calls of Scripture because they don’t know what the Bible says.”

Teaching/preaching our religious/moral ideas, which may contain great principles, is appropriate, but how much of the raw, unadulterated Word of God is being instilled into the hearts of our people? That is what brings positive change: “The word of the Lord is powerful…” (Heb. 4:12).



Looking for practical Bible studies for Wednesday night or small groups? These two books might be what you are looking for!

People in Proverbs (print or eBook)

By J. R. Ensey

Solomon and others share their wisdom about nineteen different people in the Book of Proverbs. From the Man of Understanding to the Stupid Man, from the Busy Woman to the Contentious Woman, from the Generous Man to the Offended Man and thirteen others, we deal with their traits, both good and bad. These lessons serve as sermons, Bible lessons or just personal devotional reading. The eBook is searchable and printable.

AM Price $12.95 (print)  9.95 eBook     To order click here or call 936-537-0250.

Life Is Too Short To Spend It With A Kicking Cow (eBook only)

By J. R. Ensey

There’s a story behind the title! Kicking cows deserve to be taken to the slaughterhouse. Life is too short even when we are not being kicked, but when our time here is being spent with anger, drugs, unwarranted guilt, apathy, doubt, and other hangers-on, we need to get rid of them quickly. Our spiritual life suffers when the sins of the spirit are not dealt with properly. Here are a dozen chapters that deal with some of life’s “kicking cows.” Is there one in your life?  Searchable and printable.

AM price $9.95  Searchable and printable.   To order click here or call 936-537-0250.


Truth somehow gets through the fog

More liberal logic:


Have you apologized yet?

Only students of history could have seen this coming.

When totalitarians assume power in a nation, all who might be considered opponents of the regime are classified as bad people—racists, “unduly” privileged, Jews, Christians, having the wrong skin color or ethnicity—whatever grouping can be developed and pointed to as “enemies of the state.” They are moved into the line to be eliminated by any means from positions of authority or influence.

Resistance is futile, they are told. Those who do so can be removed from their homes at gunpoint in the middle of the night, as has been the case in other countries. As General Milley has dutifully reminded us, “We (the government’s army) are the guys with the guns.”

Citizens are often forced to publicly apologize for their “sins,” as identified by those in power, and accept whatever punishment or degradation is merited. One has only to read the history of the nations that have succumbed to totalitarian communist rule to recognize the beginnings of a current day replay.

When Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge came to power in Cambodia (Kampuchea) in 1975, he transformed the nation into a Marxist state and put his heel on all opposition. He drove the conquered caste from the cities into the countryside to be reeducated and into forced labor. Bottom line: to grow great quantities of rice was all they needed to know. They could not own anything. (Sound familiar? We are beginning to hear this. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/8-predictions-for-the-world-in-2030/) All electrical appliances were taken from them. They were forced to give up everything which identified them with their former life—even down to their personal cooking pots. They were forced to eat at communal kitchens. Families were separated. Children and youth became wards of the state, and many perished from starvation while being indoctrinated in Marxism. Men and women had to live apart, collectively. One survivor spoke of having to sleep in a 45-foot collective bed.

Groups of workers would be brought before some guard or “cadre” with the power of life and death. They were forced to criticize themselves and each other in front of him and confess their “sins.” They worked 18-hour days, driven by a wicked cadre and sustained only on pitiful rations of rice gruel. Millions of men, women and children perished under the reign of Pol Pot, confirmed by mass graves opened years later to divulge countless skeletons. All of this is easily confirmed by clicking on websites like https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/pol-pot, or accessing the May 1982 National Geographic magazine, pp 598-603. The regulations shown here were posted in the local dialects as well as English.

Current leaders don’t want you to be reminded of well-documented Communist atrocities, so you won’t read of them in the current pages of your USA Today newspaper or hear it mentioned on CNN. But the leftist press will proudly publish stories and images of politicians and professors “confessing” their former privileges, or their “white rage,” or supposed racial supremacy, some apologizing for their “whiteness.” [See links below for confirmation of what is said here.] Even insisting that kids behave in class at school is called an expression of white supremacy (https://nypost.com/2021/09/15/virginia-teacher-says-making-kids-behave-is-white-supremacy/).

Images abound of our police and political leaders kneeling in contrition and submission to (or in unity with?) those beating shop owners and burning and looting stores. If they attack and rob our grandmothers on the street, no problem. They will not be prosecuted for such things according to the new city prosecutors in our largest cities. If they walk out the front door of a store with armloads of goods without paying, it is apparently viewed as part of the reparations process.        

The revolution is not coming, my friends, it is already here. Only ignorance and fearful silence will allow it to reach its climax.

Please verify the above with these links:







The Last Word

I personally did not think Trump’s too frequent tweets were a plus for his tenure in office. However, after Costco has again limited purchases on water and TP, a friend sent me a post by someone named Bob that was quite insightful: “I liked Trump’s mean tweets because they came with low prices, wide choices of food and consumer goods, low unemployment rate, respect on political world stage, low federal taxes, low inflation, harmless liberal hysteria and freedom of speech and travel.”

I notice that the Senate Armed Services Committee approved a bill that requires women ages 18-24 to register for the draft. The craziness in D.C. continues.

Have a blessed month…keep the faith.



Published in: on October 1, 2021 at 12:09 AM  Leave a Comment  

JREnsey Mid-month blog September 2021


The First Word

“If a ruler hearkens to lies, all his servants are wicked” (Proverbs 29:12).


A soldier’s dying words

The Gettysburg battlefield was strewn with bodies of the dead and dying. Cannister artillery was exploding everywhere. The moment came for the 6th North Carolina Regiment to charge the Union positions on Cemetery Hill. Colonel Issac E. Avery led the charge up the slope. A Federal artillery shell burst nearby and he fell, mortally wounded. Just before Col. Avery lost consciousness he scrawled a last, jumbled message to his subordinate, Major Samuel Tate—“Major: Tell my father I died with my face to the enemy.”

It was the honorable way to die in battle, if to die in battle he must. It meant he died doing his duty with courage and determination. He was no slacker. He didn’t cut and run. His father was proud of him, no doubt.

It is not how we enter life that counts, but how we exit. Did we fight a good fight? Did we keep the faith? Were we taking the fight to the enemy when we went down? Did we fall in the line of duty?

Perhaps that is why the treacherous prophet Baalam, when remembering the death of Jacob, the old patriarch of the Jews, prayed: “Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last end be like his!”

Baalam should have remembered that to die the death of the righteous, one must live the life of the righteous; however, he chose to forsake the traditions of the righteous. His ignominious end bespoke both his cowardice and his confusion. One must die with his face to the enemy.

Please permit a personal reference. My best non-family friend in life, Ernest L. Holley, died that way. He had prayed with me at the altar when I received the Holy Spirit at age 16. He became a lifelong mentor. There was not a cowardly bone in his body. He never turned his back to the enemy. He fought bravely for what he saw as absolutes of the faith. Oh, he would yield on debatable matters when convinced. He was big enough to say, “I was wrong.” He could back up and say, “I’m sorry…forgive me.”

He never wavered on the principles of truth, righteousness, and fundamental Christian ethics. Right was right. Wrong was wrong. Socratically, he taught you as if he taught you not. Life itself was his primary pulpit. He didn’t give in, he didn’t give up. He didn’t quit when quitting would have been easy. He faced the enemies of compromise, error and excess with a holy boldness. People weren’t his enemies. His adversaries were the philosophies of the world, vain deceit, and humanistic traditions. He went after them with the sword of the Word, and handled his blade with honesty, integrity, and spiritual wisdom.

A true soldier fell when he went down. He is greatly missed. But write this down: He died with his face to the enemy. His Father was pleased. I am proud to say he was my friend.


For parents of college students

Portland State University professor Peter Boghossian has resigned in an open letter in which he accuses the administration of fostering an environment hostile to intellectual inquiry and dissent. [No surprise about his findings.]

Boghossian, a philosophy professor and well-known critic of “woke” ideologies, said Wednesday that the university had created a “social justice factory” where students were taught “to mimic the moral certainty of ideologues.”

Professor Boghossian said that liberal college campuses could be a breeding ground for Antifa ideology. It has transformed a bastion of free inquiry into a social justice factory whose only inputs were race, gender, and victimhood and whose only outputs were grievance and division,” he added. “Students at Portland State are not being taught to think. Rather, they are being trained to mimic the moral certainty of ideologues. Faculty and administrators have abdicated the university’s truth-seeking mission and instead drive intolerance of divergent beliefs and opinions. This has created a culture of offense where students are now afraid to speak openly and honestly.”

Parents and pastors: Have you checked with your own students about what is being ingested from leftist professors and forced on them by university administrators?


An interesting quote

“Distinctions in society will always exist under every just government. Equality of talents, of education, or of wealth cannot be produced by human institutions. In the full enjoyment of the gifts of Heaven and the fruits of superior industry, economy, and virtue, every man is equally entitled to protection by law; but when the laws undertake to add to these natural and just advantages artificial distinctions to grant titles, gratuities, and exclusive privileges, to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society—the farmer, mechanics, and laborers—who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their governments.”

President Andrew Jackson; his view: “Equality under the Law but special privileges for none.”

Quoted from Andrew Jackson, by Sean Wilentz, pp. 82-83.


Thomas Sowell on the real truth about slavery

Note: in his book Black Rednecks and White Liberals (2005), noted [black] economist Dr. Thomas Sowell, included a chapter “The Real History of Slavery” (pp. 111-169) in which he does his usual superb job of debunking the myths and presenting the facts on whatever topic receives his attention.  Some excerpts from the book:

“The ability to score ideological points against American society or Western civilization, or to induce guilt and thereby extract benefits from the white population today, are greatly enhanced by making enslavement appear to be a peculiarly American, or a peculiarly white, crime. (p. 111)

“This explanation is also consistent with the otherwise inexplicable contrast between the fiery rhetoric about past slavery in the United States used by those who pass over in utter silence the traumas of slavery that still exist in Mauritania, the Sudan, and parts of Nigeria and Benin. Why so much more concern for dead people who are now beyond our help than for the living human beings suffering the burdens and humiliations of slavery today? Why does a verbal picture of the abuses of slavery in centuries past arouse far more response than contemporary photographs of present-day slaves in Time magazine, the New York Times or the National Geographic?

“It takes no more research than a trip to almost any public library or college library to show the incredibly lopsided coverage of slavery in the United States or in the Western Hemisphere, as compared to the meager writings on the even larger number of Africans enslaved in the Islamic countries of the Middle East and North Africa, not to mention the vast numbers of Europeans also enslaved in centuries past in the Islamic world and within Europe itself. At least a million Europeans were enslaved by North African pirates alone from 1500 to 1800, and some European slaves were still being sold on the auction block in Egypt, years after the Emancipation Proclamation freed blacks in the United States.  Indeed, the Anglo-Egyptian treaty of August 4, 1877 prohibited the continued sale of white slaves after August 3, 1885, as well as prohibiting the import and export of Sudanese and Abyssinian slaves.

“During the Middle Ages, Slavs were so widely used as slaves in both Europe and the Islamic world that the very word ‘slave’ derived from the word Slav—not only in English, but also in other European languages, as well as in Arabic.  (pp. 111-112)

“Slavery was also an established institution in the Western Hemisphere before Columbus’ ships ever appeared on the horizon.” [emphasis added]. (p. 112)

“While slavery was common to all civilizations, as well as to peoples considered uncivilized, only one civilization developed a moral revulsion-to- against it, very late in its history—Western civilization. . . . Moreover, within Western civilization, the principal impetus for the abolition of slavery came first from very conservative religious activists—people who would today be called ‘the religious right.’ Clearly this story is not ‘politically correct’ in today’s terms. Hence it is ignored, as if it never happened.” (p. 116)

“Contrary to the ‘myths to live by’ created by Alex Haley and others, Africans were by no means the innocents portrayed in Roots, baffled as to why white men were coming in and taking their people away in chains. On the contrary, the region of West Africa from which Kunta Kinte supposedly came was one of the great slave-trading regions of the continent—before, during, and after the white men arrived. It was the Africans who enslaved their fellow Africans, selling some of these slaves to Europeans or to Arabs and keeping others for themselves. Even at the peak of the Atlantic slave trade, Africans retained more slaves for themselves than they sent to the Western Hemisphere.” (p. 120)

“Arabs were the leading slave raiders in East Africa, ranging over an area larger than all of Europe. The total number of slaves exported from East Africa during the nineteenth century has been estimated to be at least two million.”  (p. 121)

“There were thousands of . . . blacks in the antebellum South who were commercial slaveowners, just like their white counterparts. An estimated one-third of the ‘free persons of color’ in New Orleans were slaveowners and thousands of these slaveowners volunteered to fight for the Confederacy during the war.”  (p. 127)

“Despite all this, those with an instrumental view of history have managed to turn things upside down and present slavery as an evil of ‘our society’ or of the white race or of Western civilization. One could as well do the same with murder or cancer, simply by ignoring these evils in other societies and incessantly denouncing their presence in the West. Yet what was peculiar about the West was not that it participated in the worldwide evil of slavery, but that it abolished that evil, not only in Western societies but also in other societies subject to Western control or influence.

“This was possible only because the anti-slavery movement coincided with an era in which Western power and hegemony were at their zenith, so that it was essentially European imperialism which ended slavery. This idea might seem shocking, not because it does not fit the facts, but because it does not fit the prevailing vision of our time.” (pp. 134-135)

Source: As I See It E-Zine, 9/21

Editor’s note: Slavery was and is abominable and can never be justified. In 1808 America, having recently won its independence from England, banned the importation of slaves. Fifty-five year’s later, Abraham Lincoln set all slaves in the U.S. free. Before America was a nation, slavery was practiced in Africa, the Middle East, and the Far East. Sadly, it still is a reality in some nations, although it has assumed new forms. The books pictured above reveal the ugly practice with both a past and a present reality. It was not confined to one skin shade. Those who constantly make it a subject to incite racial guilt, as Sowell points out, should reveal more than one aspect of the matter. Truth and fairness brings reality to light, and with that light we should all be able to see positives in each other a little easier.


It is not all about health

An ABC news station on Facebook asked for testimonies of unvaccinated people dying. They got the opposite, all about the fully vaccinated dying and becoming sick.


While we are not telling people not to be vaccinated, I won’t tell them to do it either. It is a personal decision each has to make based on their own conscience, convictions, and researched facts. But CDC confirms a report from Massachusetts showing that 74% of those getting Covid during this new outbreak are fully vaccinated. LINK:   https://www.verywellhealth.com/cdc-report-vaccinated-breakthrough-infections-5195483

medsIn the face of these facts, the President and his administration’s lackeys are calling non-vaccinated persons “murderers” and “killers.” Why choose a risky vaccination if you are apt to get the virus anyway? Vaccinations have traditionally been given to keep people from getting a particular disease. We have all heard stories from among our friends and relatives who did not have Covid until immediately after the shots and then died from it. Each person must make up his or her own mind about the risks and rewards.

Additionally, the CDC has now admitted the vaccinated are just as likely to spread Covid as the unvaccinated. Reckon the President has read that report? Traditionally, vaccines were to prevent getting a disease, and therefore prevent one from passing it around. One can only wonder what really is behind all these mandates.

Rutgers University bars student from attending virtual classes. How could he infect anyone even if he did have Covid?


A doctor in Houston prescribed Ivermectin for Covid patient but the hospital refused to administer it. FDA says Ivermectin is not safe. He died. Family is traumatized.

But the experimental vaccine is safe? One of our church member’s father was vaccinated, became sick, was hospitalized and passed away.

Days or weeks under a ventilator is safe? Where’s the data on that? Many doctors even say masks are not safe. Who are folks to believe? Trust in government agencies is at an all time low. Imagine that.

New study:  “The two main COVID-19 vaccines used in the United States are more likely to land teenage boys in the hospital than COVID-19 itself, a new study has found.”


It’s not all about health. It is about power and control, and our left-leaning culture is punch-drunk on it.


Definition of marriage

In 1913, the Webster’s dictionary defined marriage as between a man and a woman for life, even quoting Scripture to support their definition: “legal union of a man and a woman for life, as husband and wife; wedlock; matrimony. Marriage is honorable in all. Heb. xiii. 4.

In my 1939 huge, back-breaking-to-lift edition, it was described as “between two persons of the opposite sex…as man and wife.”157210._UY475_SS475_

However, in the current Webster’s edition it is defined as:

1a : the state of being united as spouses in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law

b : the mutual relation of married persons

c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage

Soon it may be adjusted to mean a legal association between “two or more beings” or “entities,” which may mean humans or animals, or even involving inanimate objects—dolls, carved deities, or even robots. There is no stopping on the crowded, broad freeway of which Jesus spoke. The only exit is at an altar of sincere repentance. Otherwise, at the end of the road is only divine retributive justice.



Adorning The Doctrine

by J. R. Ensey


This book deals with doctrine and spirituality, doctrine and the Book of Acts, doctrine and “three mentions,” and curbing the influx of false doctrine. For truth seekers only. In both English and Spanish.

AM Price $4.95

To order go to  Advance Ministries.



The New Cyclopedic Theological Dictionary (eBook)

by J. R. Ensey
The only reference volume we know of based on the biblical, Apostolic viewpoint!
When you need the definition of a theological term, the description of a religious movement, or the meaning of over a thousand words that are found in reference works and the Bible…turn to The New Cyclopedic Theological Dictionary!

– Over 1000 entries
– Definitions and descriptions of many Bible words, theological terms, and religious movements
– 486 pages of easy-to-read, easy-to-use information
– The only reference volume of its kind! Written from a conservative, apostolic perspective, this classic work has enhanced the study habits of thousands of ministers and laymen.

“This dictionary is far more than a word study; it is replete with the background and history of many doctrinal positions and teachings. It also serves as a standard for testing the validity of different theories–an invaluable tool!” -Dr. Marvin Treece

AM price $12.95   Order the searchable eBook format from Advance Ministries.

Print version available from Amazon.


Truth is AWOL in DC


AAAAA Making Taliban great USE

In the spirit of 9/11, I would like to say a personal thanks to all the first responders, dead and living, who were serving in NYC and in DC on that fateful day. Many were taken from their families in that event which, like Pearl Harbor, will live in infamy. And a salute also goes to all the veterans who have kept our nation free from 1776 until this day. God bless you…and may God bless America with many more brave individuals like you.


The Last Word

There is no freedom where there is no truth.

Have a blessed day…keep the faith.


PS: If you know someone who would like to receive announcements of the blog postings, please send them the link to this blog and encourage them to sign up just to the right of the text.

Published in: on September 16, 2021 at 6:20 AM  Leave a Comment  

September Blog

Welcome…thanks for visiting!

The First Word

When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn” (Proverbs 29:2 KJV).

Hurricane Ida: Our prayers and human efforts are offered for our friends, our fellow Christians, and all Americans who were in the path of this deadly and devastating storm.


Are Apostolic women listening?

Wise words recently came from Candace Owens, a Fox News contributor and a close observer of women in the current culture: “Women: find a good man. Get married. If you are able and willing to, have children and plenty of them. Learn to cook. Be domestic. It is a generational lie that these things enslave you. Far from it, they enrich your existence. Life is about family, not work.”

She was brave enough to offer direction to a generation that has lost its way. It is regretful the words had to come from a non-Apostolic woman.

Now don’t accuse her of being totally opposed to women working outside the home when necessary and appropriate. She’s not, but the multiplying scandals filling the news might be reduced and more families rescued from the divorce courts if American women chose homemaking and childrearing over workplaces crowded with other wives’ husbands.

That idea did not originate during the last decade. Anyone can find it in an old black-backed book called the Bible: “The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things; That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed…You must teach these things and encourage the believers to do them” (Titus 2:3-5).  Leaders and pastors, why not underline that last sentence in your Bible as a reminder: “You must teach these things and encourage the believers to do them”? All may not be able to fulfill the entire passage to letter, but the responsibility of leadership is to teach and encourage these things.

Read those verses mentioned, Ephesians 5, and the first three chapters of Genesis and you get a good picture of God’s ideal. Not everyone can or will hang in with that prescription. But remember, the farther one gets from God’s ideal, the more problems they invite to themselves and their families. For proof, just look around.

I don’t think Paul was condemning those women who had to work in ways that were required to put food on the table and clothe the family, but shouldn’t we conscientiously strive to conform to what the Bible teaches in all possible ways?


Where feminism has brought us



“Seed” or “seeds” in Genesis 22:17-18?

Those who tend to vilify all but one translation or version of the Bible often refer to Genesis 22:17 as being mistranslated in some versions, thus changing the thrust of the verse. They turn to Galatians 3:16 as a proof-text. For those who know how to do your own research, check several serious textual commentaries on those verses. You may want to reference the objective treatment of the verses at  https://www.letusreasononline.com/single-post/2019/11/20/seed-or-descendants-gen-2217a

Other interesting and helpful comments are found in Barnes Notes, Ellicott’s Commentary, the Septuagint (often quoted by Jesus and the NT writers), or the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges. All these and many others can be easily accessed online.

I do plan to increase biblical studies in future blogs. I invite your expressions of interest regarding particular topics and scriptures.


Someone submitted the following to me without an author’s name.

Why Did The Chicken Cross The Road?

DONALD TRUMP: I’ve been told by my many sources, good sources—they’re very good sources—that the chicken crossed the road. All the Fake News wants to do is write nasty things about the road, but it’s a really good road. It’s a beautiful road. Everyone knows how beautiful it is.

JOE BIDEN: Why did the chicken do the…thing in the…awww, you know the rest, man.

SARAH PALIN: The chicken crossed the road because, #&*&%$@ it, he’s a maverick!

BARACK OBAMA: Let me be perfectly clear, if the chickens like their eggs they can keep their eggs. No chicken will be required to cross the road to surrender her eggs. Period.

AOC: Chickens should not be forced to lay eggs! This is because of corporate greed! Eggs should be able to lay themselves.

HILLARY CLINTON: What difference at this point does it make why the chicken crossed the road?

GEORGE W. BUSH: We don’t really care why the chicken crossed the road. We just want to know if the chicken is on our side of the road or not. The chicken is either with us or against us. There is no middle ground here.

DICK CHENEY: Where’s my gun?

BILL CLINTON: I did not…cross the road with that chicken.

AL GORE: I invented the chicken.

JOHN KERRY: Although I voted to let the chicken cross the road, I am now against it! It was the wrong road to cross, and I was misled about the chicken’s intentions. I am not for it now, and will remain against it.

AL SHARPTON: Why are all of that chicken’s eggs white?

Dr. PHIL: The problem we have here is that this chicken won’t realize that he must first deal with the problem on this side of the road before it goes after the problem on the other side of the road. What we need to do is help him realize how stupid he is acting by not taking on his current problems before adding any new problems.

ANDERSON COOPER: We have reason to believe a chicken has crossed, but we have not yet been allowed to have access to the other side of the road.

NANCY GRACE: That chicken crossed the road because he’s guilty! You can see it in his eyes and the way he walks.

PAT BUCHANAN: To steal the job of a decent, hardworking American, of course.

DR SEUSS: Did the chicken cross the road? Did he cross it with a toad? Yes, the chicken crossed the road, but why it crossed I’ve not been told.

ERNEST HEMINGWAY: To die in the rain, alone.

GRANDPA: In my day we didn’t ask why the chicken crossed the road. Somebody told us the chicken crossed the road, and that was good enough for us.

ARISTOTLE: It is the nature of chickens to cross the road.

ALBERT EINSTEIN: Did the chicken really cross the road, or did the road move beneath the chicken?

COLONEL SANDERS: Did I miss one?


The Ancient Future of Apostolic Pentecostalism

Where is Christianity headed in the West? A smaller percentage of the populace is on church pews in North America than ever before. The numbers are disquieting. The only growing segments of the faith seem to be Pentecostal-oriented or small fringe elements. While our own growth is better than average, our time could come when we are searching for answers for unoccupied seats. Those answers may be different in each segment of the Christian faith.

According to journalist Todd Starnes, “42% of millennials stated they either don’t know, don’t care or don’t believe God exists. And this is a surprise? We turned our churches into glorified nightclubs starring preachers who deliver self-help sermons and worship leaders who want to be the next American idol.”

In reading other authors on this phenomenon, many seem to yearn for a return to the early 1900s. While those are historically prominent years for Evangelical Pentecostals, yet they were fraught with deep emotional divisions and serious theological battles. Others want us to reevaluate the principles of the Reformation—capturing liturgical practices and sacramental ordinances as identifiers of faith. Still others may feel that the departure from forced religious participation of medieval times, when compliance was mandated on pain of ostracism, persecution, or even death, was a wrong step.

One current appeal is for Christians to emulate, at least in spirit, the earlier Desert Fathers and mystics of the first millennial A.D. That was when fringe Christians developed so-called spiritual disciplines—a mystical and contemplative spirituality that focused on spirit guides and visions, and mistakingly disdained fleshly functions as inherently evil and worthy of punishment and a lack of personal care.

To find the true roots of our heritage, we must go back farther than that—back past the first councils marked by their struggles with inroads of Gnosticism and paganism, past the Roman persecution of the second and third centuries. We have to dig deep into the first century to find those elements of the faith that are vital for our future. If we have a future prior to the opening of Heaven’s door, an emphasis on the basics will be the key to our effectiveness and longevity. They are what makes Apostolics apostolic. Our right to that nomenclature lies in our faithfulness to the fundamental doctrines of the faith published by inspiration in our New Testament, written during the first 70 years after Christ.

Other emphases would rob us of the power of fundamental truth, which alone makes men free. Motivating faith in Christ as Savior, confession and forgiveness of sin, followed by water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ and the infilling of the Holy Spirit, plus subsequent separation unto Christ in a holiness lifestyle, are the first principles of the Christian faith. To supplant them by focusing on philosophy, scholasticism, psychology, or mind-bending quasi-religious theories being currently encouraged is to virtually guarantee a circumvention of true growth in the future.

Our future runs through our ancient past. Think about it.


Thanks, Guv

Let’s see. Wokeness has already replaced history with the BLM curriculum. Now readin’, ’rittin, and ‘rithmatic can be forgotten. Gov. Kate Brown, the bi-sexual Oregon Democrat, signed a bill last month with little fanfare that drops the requirement that high school students prove proficiency in reading, writing or math, before graduation. Hey, who needs all that boring, highfalutin’ stuff, nohow? And in science class our kids can learn how to make safer Molotov cocktails. That would be scientific, right? And geogerfy…all we really need to know about that is how to find China on the map.


I have heard…

That the government is planning to mandate blindfolds in addition to facemasks so you can’t see what is really going on.

That the people who are set up to dismember babies in the womb are so concerned about our health that they insist that everyone must wear masks.

That current trends were seen long ago by the Egyptians, how that Daddy could someday become a Mummy.

That if the slogan “Rules for thee but not for me” were a person, it would look just like Barack Obama.

That the shopping cart with one loud, gyrating, annoying wheel is called an AOC cart.

That the Congress has rejected the security protocols for their Capitol that are in place at the border. I wonder why?

That circuses are struggling to find new clowns since all the top prospects have decided to go into politics.

That shutting down the nation for two weeks would curb the spread of the virus. Someone suggested that they shut down the government for a couple of weeks to curb the spread of totalitarianism. Hmmmm….

That some when being asked by restaurant managers to show their virus vaccination cards are requesting to see the vaccination proof and test results of the restaurant’s waitstaff regarding AIDS or other contagious diseases.


Why won’t they take their own medicine?

An info blast that shook things up on social media a few days ago stated that the White House, the CDC, FDA, Pfizer, Moderna, WHO, and Johnson & Johnson did not mandate their employees to be vaccinated as they are for businesses and corporations that do business with the government. They must know something we don’t. I began to research that claim and see if it were true before publishing it. Here’s what I have found so far:

First this: The Red Cross says they need blood donors, but not plasma from those who have been vaccinated. Why? The vaccine destroys the natural antibodies.

The World Health Organization (WHO) does not currently mandate vaccination for employees. They provide mumbo-jumbo about the meaning of “mandatory.” I thought immediately of Bill Clinton trying to excuse his morals by arguing about the definition of “is.”

The White House on July 23 announced it did not mandate vaccinations for their employees. Later, on July 29, they announced they it would now be mandatory for all employees of government agencies, including the White House. It is strange that as soon as the information had gone out that these employers did not mandate vaccinations, the FDA suddenly announced its approval of the Pfizer vaccine. Shine a light and the roaches get moving.

Pfizer confirmed it had a “similar policy” for just its U.S. employees. Outside the U.S. the company is “strongly encouraging all colleagues who are able to do so” to be vaccinated. The people making, selling, and administering the vaccine to others aren’t able to do it to themselves?

Moderna, another major vaccine supplier, announced quickly after the info went viral that they planned to require vaccination for all of its U.S. employees by October 1. Why wait? On the positive side, the company said they would consider requests for medical and religious exemptions on an individual basis.

Johnson and Johnson announced on August 20 that they would begin mandatory vaccinations for its U.S. employees by Oct. 4, about five weeks away from the date of this post. If unvaccinated people are “murderers” as the President has said, why wait? “Individuals who have medical conditions or other reasons not to be vaccinated will be able to seek accommodations,” they said. We’ll see.

The World Health Organization (WHO) issued a response that said: “The World Health Organization does not presently support the direction of mandates for COVID-19 vaccination, having argued that it is better to work on information campaigns and making vaccines accessible.”

At least the informative news blast that circulated in late August—and was at least partially accurate—evoked some movement and provided a few answers.

Source: 9News.com 8/25/21


Book review

Why Men Hate Going to Church

By David Murrow

Thomas Nelson, 2011; 239 pages; 15.99 or less from Amazon

Men are AWOL from many churches, as if there was a restroom sign on the front door saying “Women Only.”


Not many of us have stopped to ask ourselves that question. Or if it does tiptoe across our mind it is dismissed with a shrug and self-speak like, “Well, that is just the way men are. They are not as receptive to the gospel as women.” Then we dust our hands and forget about it.

But soul winners can’t forget. Pastors who care can’t forget. Leaders called by God can’t forget. Lay persons who love can’t forget.

What is disenfranchising so many men today? Why are they staying home, or choosing to be elsewhere on Sunday? How can we influence more men to serve God? Don’t give this book a second thought unless you are serious about finding some answers.

One of the most effective ways to win men is to first discover why they are not presently being won. Any pastor who considers the research Murrow has put into this book will be motivated to make whatever adjustments are necessary to move toward a greater percentage of men in their congregation. He pulls no punches. He tells it like it is. He is not a soldier in the man-only army. He is balanced, but he knows many of the obstacles turning men away from churches today. I found the book very helpful, as some others have. You may not adopt every idea or concept, but I guarantee some of them will appeal to you.

Chapters fall under the three main sections in the book:

  • Where are the men?
  • Church culture vs. man culture
  • Calling the church back to men

The chapter on contemporary Christian worship, and how it has turned many men off, is worth the price of the book alone. The author is familiar with many denominations—from Catholic to Pentecostal. He lists 12 things men fear about the church, and how the church is driving boys away from the church. He deals frankly with relationships, what attracts men to church, and shows how to engage men.

You will enjoy reading the book while you are getting a wealth of ideas you can put into practice in your local assembly.

Buy this book! You will not regret it. If you do and you honestly find it worthless, send it to me and I will pay you whatever you paid for it. Offer extends through October 31, 2021. –  JRE



Does God Really Care….?

by J. R. Ensey

Do hair and clothing styles really matter to God? This is actually two booklets in one (flip book), presenting a Christian perspective of I Corinthians 11 and Deuteronomy 22:5. Perhaps no passages of biblical literature have been so attacked by modern change agents as these two. There must be a reason.  Inexpensive enough to give a copy to every family in your congregation.

AM Price $3.95

Faith In The Furnace

by J. R. Ensey

Is it God’s will that all believers be healed each time they become sick? What is the “prayer of faith”? Is there a theology of divine healing? If I have enough faith is God obligated to heal me?

When pain racks the body or death is staring you in the face, you need answers, not just questions. Here are some down-to-earth, no-nonsense responses to those and similar questions when you are in the furnace of affliction. No hype, just biblical truth focusing on divine healing. Easy to read, thousands sold.  AM Price $9.95

To order these and other books, go to advanceministries.org/store or simply call 936-537-0250.


News by art and photos, and the good news first

Hundreds of thousands crowd the streets in Kiev to celebrate the new law that allows the gospel to be preached in the Ukraine. Let’s rejoice with them!

That last entry is turning my stomach to mush these days. One teacher in California took down the American flag in the classroom. When they kids asked for it, she said it was lost. But there was another large flag posted on the classroom wall—the gay pride flag. She suggested the kids say the pledge of allegiance to it. C’mon, parents! Stand up to the school boards. Don’t let them get away with stealing our kids for anti-biblical causes.


The Last Word

Some wonder why I give so much space to the condition of our culture and the corruption of the current government. Why not give 100% of the space to Bible studies and the like? That was my primary intention when I began this blog. However, when one’s house is on fire, he doesn’t worry about the how many steaks might be lost in the freezer. There will be neither food nor freezer if he doesn’t get the fire put out. Right now our house is on fire. Our children are asleep in their beds upstairs. Our pets are shut up in the playroom. Our vital papers are in the desk. The car is in the garage and full of flamable gas.

The Ukraine is celebrating their new opportunity to preach the gospel. This is due to their consistent pressure on the politicians and electing leaders with common sense. Sadly, we are quickly losing that same freedom here. Right now it is time for the fire extinguishers and the water hoses. It’s time to serve on school boards and speak to those in power. We must make our voices heard where it counts. We’ll get to Melchizedek and who Gog and Magog might be at some time in the future. Right now let’s help put the fire out and cut our losses.

God bless…and remember to pray for our nation and those in power. Also, please pray for those in positions of authority in our own church movement. They need our prayers for strength to stand in a time when it is not easy to do so.


Published in: on September 1, 2021 at 1:26 AM  Leave a Comment  

August Special Edition 2021

Shelve the diversity, not common sense

August 27, 2021

As if we could be more shocked than we already are, the Sergeant Major of the U.S. Army callously chose the day after the horrific carnage in Kabul that killed a dozen or more of our servicemen to celebrate diversity featuring females in the military. While our soldiers were flying back to Dover in body bags, he was bragging about the army’s advancement in diversity. When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.

“Diversity is a number,” he tweeted. “Do you have people that don’t look or think like you in the room? Inclusion is When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.listening and valuing those people. Women’s Equality Day reminds us that we are smarter and more lethal when we come together as in inclusive, cohesive team. Our values demand it.”

He included about 60 frames of women in military camo. Please…which American value “demands” we throw our daughters and wives and sisters into harm’s way in time of armed conflict? What fool believes we are headed toward a more lethal military and a stronger America by pushing women into every officer’s slot that comes open? The army even tailors uniforms to fit pregnant women. All in the name of equality and “equity.”

This is idiocy on its face and can only add to the chorus of guffaws from our enemies. If diversity is a number, then equality means the goal is for half of the armed forces to be women. Don’t you know the Taliban and ISIS are shaking in their boots at the thought of such a lethal army?!?!

Watching our President, the Commander-in-Chief, being questioned in a press conference yesterday was painful. My mind went to Proverbs 30:1-3: “I am weary, O God;
I am weary and worn out, O God. I am too stupid to be human, and I lack common sense.
I have not mastered human wisdom, nor do I know the Holy One.”

What about God’s army? In our own movement, consistent in the last three years has been the call for diversity. Gradually words like “inclusion…reconciliation…equity” began to show up—words drawn directly from secular academia and leftist movements. I suppose we were expected to force them in some biblical context (Acts), but when accreditation officials for educational institutions roll up, the Acts definition probably may not cut the mustard. The powers that be will provide the definitions and force compliance.

If diversity is a number, and we lemming-like place a number of people who “don’t look like us or think like us” on boards and in positions that provide direction for laity or ministry, where will we be in ten years? In twenty years? Don’t we need those in office who think like the Bible teaches and who look like the Bible teaches (I’m not talking about skin color here)? Whatever happened to unity with biblical principles?

Someone might say, “We need to put people in positions who don’t think like us for ‘balance.’” With what should our Articles of Faith and holiness standards as set forth in the Manual be balanced? How much error or compromise is required to balance truth?

Imagine, if you will, Jesus taking a break on the road to Bethany and calling His twelve disciples around Him and saying, “Men, it’s time we considered a little diversity here. I am going to ask Mary and Martha, along with four other women, to join our group. Six of you will be able to return to your homes and jobs. If any of my choices happen to be your wife, tough. Those men who stay with me will be asked to carry the travel bags of the women who will be joining us, plus your own.”

Peter speaks up: “Lord, is that fair? That last part doesn’t seem like equality.”

Jesus: “Peter, equality has to do with number and and what people look like. What I am also installing is called equity. And it will be one of our guiding principles from this day forward. And just think…there will be some names on the foundation of the New Jerusalem besides men’s names. It will make some of the ladies happy. John, be sure you make that clear in your description of the city in the Book of Revelation.”

I trow not.

When the language and programs of the ungodly culture makes their appearance in our educational institutions and literature, what are we to think? Right now, wisdom would dictate that we avoid tripping over ourselves to get in line with someone’s idea of diversity and equity. Better it would be that we deliver to the next generation a solid Apostolic faith once delivered to the saints that we have held in trust for them. We are accountable to God for that, my brethren (Titus 1:9).







Published in: on August 27, 2021 at 7:10 PM  Comments (2)  

JREnsey blog for August 2021

Welcome…thanks for visiting!

The First Word

Don’t you realize that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, who lives in you and was given to you by God? You do not belong to yourself, 20 for God bought you with a high price. So you must honor God with your body” (I Corinthians 6:29,20 NLT).


Some good stuff

Good thought: Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery and today is a gift—that is why they call it “present.”

Good observation: It is easier to preach ten sermons than it is to live one.

Good thing to remember: Forbidden fruits create many jams.

Good source of credibility: We are giving extreme credibility to some solely because they sat at the feet of fools for three or four years and got a piece of paper confirming that they did so. We are bowing before the wrong entity. Rather than worshipping at the altar of humanism, shouldn’t we be honoring God with worship and obeisance at the altar of absolute truth? Education including that perspective provides true credibility.

Good fact to keep in mind: He who angers you, controls you!

Good insight: God doesn’t always call the qualified; He qualifies the called.

Good Word: “In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe. The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven. So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs” (Hebrews 1:1-4).

Good suggestion:  “If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.” – Samuel Adams (1722-1803)

Good news: God hasn’t gone anywhere. He is still on the throne observing all that is going on. He hasn’t forgotten any of us. His people are the apple of His eye and are engraved on the palm of His hand (Isaiah 49:15,16).


Things I don’t understand

That list could get a little long for this blog! I will start by joining with Agur when he wrote:

“There be three things which are too wonderful for me, yea, four which I know not: The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a maid” (Proverbs 30:18,19 KJV).

• Why brilliant thinkers who become theologians cannot see the Oneness of God when it is so clear in the Scriptures.

• When it is even less difficult to see baptism in the name of Jesus, why do the most revered Bible commentators in Christianity insist on using a trinitarian-sounding formula that even many of them believe may have been a later insertion into the Gospel of Matthew (28:19)?

• Why do some intelligent-seeming men will forsake the clear pronouncements on holiness in the NT epistles, while claiming to be committed Christians? What in the apostles’ writings is dispensable and immaterial?

• Why do some very smart people dismiss the clear Bible teaching about the roles of men and women relative to functional authority in the home and church when the fruit of such a position is on constant display in religion and culture?

• Why we forget so quickly. The “Gipper” knew: “One of the traditional methods of imposing statism, or socialism, on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project.” – Ronald Reagan

• These seem to be on a par with the mystery of why the President, in response to the gun violence in the cities like Chicago, Baltimore, NYC, etc., wants to remove the long guns from the homes of law-abiding citizens in Wyoming and Tennessee instead of going after the criminal elements using handguns for killing each in the inner cities.


Are you into cisheteropatriarchialism?

Did you know that you might be guilty of cisheteropatriarchialism? The National Teachers Association (NEA) thinks so. And if so, your children will be taught that you are a bad person. What else might your kids hear you called this fall?

The NEA has released their plans to right all of America’s wrongs, beginning this fall, by indoctrinating your children with a mandatory K-12, race-based curriculum that assumes “white supremacy, anti-Blackness, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, ableism, and anthropocentrism” are embedded in every aspect of American society.” All this, they say, “is reasonable and appropriate for kids.” Math, Language, Science, History, Geography and Technology be d—-d. If they do teach any course with one of those titles it will be laced with critical race theory and similar hogwash.

Cisheteropatriarchy is a system of male, heterosexual (straight), conforming-to-assigned sex system of power. Its primary expression is a husband’s authority over women and children in the family. In feminist theory, it is “a socio-political system where (primarily) cisgender males (males conforming to birth gender) and heterosexuals have authority over cisgender females and over other sexual orientations and gender identities. It is a term that emphasizes that discrimination of women and LGBTQ people has the same sexist social principle.”

Ableism is a set of beliefs or practices that devalue and discriminate against people with physical, intellectual, or psychiatric disabilities and often rests on the assumption that disabled people need to be ‘fixed’ in one form or the other,” writes Leah Smith in her blog for the Center for Disability Rights. For instance, schools must have elevators installed for those who use walkers or wheelchairs. Who would deny the equitableness of that? But notice “intellectual or psychiatric disabilities.” How will those people be “fixed”? You guessed it—indoctrination, re-education and re-orientation, you know, like the wonderful programs the communists set up in each of the countries they take over. Either get re-worked or go to the labor camps or the wall.

Anthropocentrism refers to a human-centered, or “anthropocentric,” point of view. This term can refer to the point of view that humans are the only, or primary, holders of moral standing, allowing animals, plants, mineral resources, etc., to be justifiably exploited—hunted, eaten, or utilized in other ways like tree-harvesting, plowing with animals, and burning oil to stay warm. Such utilization falls into their definition of “violence.”

Another word they are throwing around is “indigeneity.” What does it mean? It refers to various peoples who have moral claims on nation-states and on international society, often because of inhumane, unequal, and exclusionary treatment. For example, the Indians of North America. California teachers’ union casts the U.S. as “a parasitic system based on the invasion of white settlers.” A convenient historical twist to fit their narrative.

Speaking of a “parasitic system,” just take a stroll down the street past a Walgreen’s or a TJMaxx store while a bold, daylight shoplift is going on and watch them fill bags full of whatever they want and calmly walk out the door with it. No one stops them. That is what we are seeing today. Big city prosecutors and justice officials are in the pocket of BLM, so the perps know they will not be prosecuted. What a new world we live in.


His commitment was “in the bag”

When the regular weekly Bible study teacher was unavailable for the study being conducted at the Shepherd AFB near Wichita Falls, TX in 1979, as pastor of the First UPC (now the Life Church), I substituted. Several airmen attended the study, one of whom was Willie Thornton. It was his first Bible study. He took it all in. He was back the next week and soon started attending our church on Sundays. One Sunday evening, I was preaching and kind of got excited so I jumped up on the altar bench as I preached. Things were moooooving in that service! Suddenly, Willie got up and walked slowly up the aisle to the end of the altar on which I was standing. What was he doing? He had a large bag in his hand which he placed on the end of altar and stood there. I continued preaching while also trying to figure out what Willie was doing down there. What was in that cloth bag? Was it drug paraphernalia? Some other symbol of his repentance? I came to a place in my preaching where I stopped and shouted: “Willie, what’s in the bag?”

In his slow southern drawl, he answered, “It’s my clothes, Brother Ensey. I want to be baptized in Jesus’ name!” After our little jubilee shout-down during which several were filled with the Spirit, I baptized Willie. Willie worshipped with us while at Shepherd AFB, acknowledging his call to ministry. He and his wife, who also prayed through, assisted Bro. Allan Abbey in California for several years. He then moved to Pine Bluff, AR to plant a much needed church in that city, where he still pastors the Calvary Evangelism Center. What a great team they have made for the Lord. Willie was among 23 others at SAFB who were converted that year. He and three others became ministers.

A few months ago, I visited them to personally honor Pastor Willie Thornton and his wife for the great work they have done and are doing in Pine Bluff and for his military service to our country. May God give us many more soldiers of the cross like them.


None of your business?

“It is nobody’s business if a person chooses to take mind-bending drugs, or if there are countless drug users in our schools and on our streets. What they ingest is no one else’s business.”

Really? Wait until one of them steals your wife’s purse or car to pay for their habit. Or steals your daughter’s virginity then pleads before the judge: “I was under the influence of —— and didn’t know what I was doing. I’m sure sorry,” and soon walks free. Then say it was none of your business what drug addicts do to their own bodies. It is absolutely our business that drugs are readily available in our schools and streets. It is why your auto insurance is so high, and why the danger for women being out alone has increased exponentially.

This is why it is also our business what is going on at our southern border. The flow of immigrants is allowing a free flow of drugs into our country. The government is not stopping either of them.

The seeming aim of today’s liberals and socialists is to lead our youth and millennials into immorality, homelessness, theft, drug addiction, crimes of all categories, and other activities that are negative within our culture. Most police actions are the results of drugs or alcohol. The movie stars, sports icons, and celebrities of every stripe seem to be users, and by example are pushers. Big pharma, coupled with porous borders, are rapidly erasing the American dream. We must maintain the will to support the minority of leaders who uphold the laws of our society.


Apostolic diversity

Multicultural pluralism, painted by liberals as “diversity,” is not an antidote for either real or perceived racism. It is a prescription for the collapse of the American experiment. The more pluralism is imposed on the culture, the closer we are to reverting to just another third world country.

Diversity of immigrants has always been part and parcel of the American experiment. That is how America climbed to the top of the world’s nations during the industrial revolution. Those coming here from many nations to participate in our freedoms, to adopt our work ethic and form of government, were vetted and welcomed.

Although America is not a theocracy, we should never be moved from the certitude that God was somehow involved in the planting of this nation, notwithstanding its shortcoming of some of its citizen/leaders. It has been the primary benefactor of missionary endeavors fanning the flames of worldwide endtime revival. The concept of adding more stand alone cultures rather than assimilating immigrants into the American system may well speed the demise of the nation and thus its evangelistic and missionary activities.

The NT mentions men and women of various nations who found salvation through Christ and the Apostolic gospel. But I find no example of any congregation in Scripture counting heads, shades of skin colors, or shapes of eyes in their audience with the objective, “We must find a balance here.” No NT olive-skinned Jew is on record saying, “We need more Asians, Africans, or white Europeans in our congregations.” All were welcomed without those considerations. Evangelism was practiced without such a divisive, discriminating approach. Salvation was presented with a “whosoever will” appeal.

A prophecy: Conceptual diversity approved at higher levels of authority is apt to become expanded and distorted as it is applied at lower levels. Pressures at the point of activation will virtually guarantee that. Consider this scenario: “Pastor, your approach to biblical interpretation/holiness/community involvement/politics do not align with our cultural feelings. You should be more sensitive to our way of thinking. Let us practice Christian living as we view it.” I doubt any committed pastor would say, “Oh, sure, y’all do it any way that is comfortable for you. No problem. We will work on our cultural sensitivity with some classes on how to accommodate your feelings. Please forgive us while we grovel in humility and repentance.” That’s the approach being taken by our secular culture and some major elements of Christianity.

Diversity in the sense expressed by some Christian leaders, college professors and millennials is NOT our strength. It is a short-sighted approach that undercuts what the founders of this republic had in mind and is helping to obliterate the American blessing of individual freedoms.

PS: Just so you know—although we are not bean counters, there is just about every eye shape and skin shade, as well as those of several national origins, in our local congregation.


“…and perils among college professors…”

Consider the perils facing college students:

67% of college professors approve of homosexuality;
84% of professors approve of abortion;
65% embrace socialist and communist ideals;
88% of students from “Christian” homes depart from the teaching of their faith before they graduate from college (Pentecostals about 78-80%);
91% of students from evangelical churches do not believe in absolute moral truth.

We must teach our constituents biblical discernment and critical thinking. Instead of accepting the postulates of a godless society without examination, they should be able to analyze such ideas from a biblical worldview mindset.

The Apostle Paul advised: “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God” (Romans 12:2).

– Source: Those stats were published several years ago by Worldview Weekend; submitted by G. Jorge Medina. What would the percentages be today?


Slavery in America

Why is it that research seems to show that slavery exists only in countries having a majority of people of color, particularly Islamic nations? The Muslim immigrants of Minneapolis who now run the city and the state’s Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, should attack slavery where it actually exists. Where is it active among any nation that is predominantly white? What is the skin color and the condoning religions of those nations where it still openly exists? They should consider this before assuming every white person in America is a white supremacist and equal to a slave owner. Or is the plan to eventually make every white person a slave to some degree?

Slavery in the “new world,” including America, was a British (or other colonizing nations active here) practice. As a colonial extension of the British Empire, some large landowners in America’s southern region used slaves which had been captured in Africa by their own tribal leaders and sold to traders and ship owners who brought them here. The British saw the handwriting on the wall and in 1772 banished slavery from the homeland. We finally freed ourselves from the British in 1783 (Treaty of Paris).

Subsequently, American leaders began systematic campaigns to eliminate the practice, renouncing it in most states soon thereafter. For the sake of national unity and to avoid endless wars plaguing most European nations, the original Constitution made no immediate room for sweeping laws to stop the practice. Most present at the Constitutional Convention believed slavery was on its way to extinction in the country. However, the invention of the cotton gin in 1794 revolutionized farming in the south that slowed the process. However, in 1808 the nation disallowed the importation of slaves to the U.S. Slaveholding was repudiated and abolished entirely in 1863 under President Lincoln. Those who continue to clamor about slavery in America are beating a dead horse. We put an end to it in all sections of the country 158 years ago and gradually gave full rights and benefits to all whose forebears had been slaves. No one in America would favor a return to the practice. So back off. The poorest or most uneducated among descendants of former slaves has the same voting right and voice in elections as the wealthiest and most powerful persons in America.

Even the sordid elements within America that force or pay people to come here to be used as “sexual slaves” (human trafficking) seem to be people of color (48% are Hispanic) or non-citizens. Why aren’t they being condemned by the radical left? U.S. government agents and police have traditionally fought human trafficking with gusto. Our Constitution states that all people are created equal and all citizens enjoy equal justice under the law. However, that does not guarantee that all men are equal in morals, equal in ability, equal in motivation, equal in vision, or equal in any personal measure, regardless of skin color. To bring that closer to reality, America built a society that encourages people of all backgrounds to be educated, informed, and motivated to become unswerving advocates of both corporate and personal freedom. That society should not be dismantled lest all Americans become slaves to a government fueled by oligarchs.


Why not?

Over a decade ago, the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles joined seven other dioceses in passing a resolution advocating lesbians as well as homosexual men as bishops. That was the agenda all along among the activists. The “big umbrella” just kept getting bigger. Do this and then it will be simple to demand this. When we then get that, we will be in position to take an even bigger prize. One step at a time. Apostolics must remember there are no easy exits on the freeway to compromise.

Archbishop John Chrysostom (c. 347-407) of Constantinople is often referred to by feminists as an advocate for women in Christian leadership because of his use of them as deaconesses. But when the matter of leadership arose, he wrote, “When one is required to preside over the Church, and be entrusted with the care of so many souls, the whole female sex must retire before the magnitude of the task, and the majority of men also.” – Quoted by Alice C. Linsley, a former Episcopal priest, at https://virtueonline.org/ten-objections-women-priests in her article “Ten Objections to Women Priests.”




by J. R. Ensey

Some younger men have called for reasons that specific holiness standards appear in the UPCI Manual. They were not around when the issues were debated and passed in conferences. It is easier in today’s cultural climate to give up the fight than to take the time to find out why Pentecostals believe what we do. Here are 224 pages of some common sense, Word-based answers for our apostolic positions.

• Why do Apostolics embrace the Bible as the Word of God?

• Why do Apostolics teach monotheism?

• Why do Apostolics receive the Holy Spirit and speak in tongues?

• Why do Apostolics disengage from a worldly lifestyle?

• Why do Apostolics abandon or avoid harmful personal practices?

• Why do Apostolics choose modest apparel and shun ornamental

• Why do Apostolic ladies refrain from cutting their hair and wearing

• Why do Apostolics live with a blessed hope?

“Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander” (I Peter 3:15,16).

AM Price $12.95

Evidential Tongues

by J. R. Ensey
Here is some vital research on a doctrine and practice we hold as foundational—speaking in tongues when one receives the Holy Spirit.

The fact that many in the classical Pentecostal movement have ceased to stress this aspect of the new birth experience  disturbes us. It behooves us to occasionally take a harder look at our fundamental doctrines—not to try to disprove them but to make sure that the girders of truth are still bearing the load of centuries of attacks. To shore up our principal doctrines for each new generation is imperative.

The book walks through the Acts of the Apostles to verify the consistency of the doctrine in the early church. But what happened to it after the first century? Research was done to highlight glossolalia (speaking in tongues) throughout the Dark Ages, into the Reformation period, during the development of various Protestant denominations, and on to Topeka and Azusa St. How it became a tenet of faith in the burgeoning Pentecostal movement is covered. Current views climax the study.

This is a historical odyssey that will strengthen your faith.

AM Price $7.95

To order books go to https://www.advanceministries.org/zencart


Canst thou believe…?


The Last Word (for pastors’ wives only):

“Jesus wept” (John 11:35) is the shortest verse in the Bible.

The story is told that Jesus made a quick return to earth for a visit. He came upon a lame man, had compassion on him and healed his leg. Further down the road, Our Lord came upon a blind man, had compassion on him, and healed him.

A little further, Jesus came upon a woman sitting on the curb sobbing her heart out. Jesus asked her what was wrong. The woman cried out in tearful agony, “I’m a pastor’s wife!”

Jesus sat down beside her, put His arm around her…and wept with her.


Have the best growth in your church ever…in August! And send the link to this blog to a friend.


Published in: on August 1, 2021 at 12:17 AM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey blog July 2021

The First Word

Those who worship false gods turn their backs on all God’s mercies” (Jonah 2:8 NLT).


Historical tidbits II

  • Some were surprised to learn that Protestants also persecuted and even martyred some Christian believers who would not fully accept their doctrines and practices. Catholics preferred burning heretics at the stake, while those in Lutheran or Zwinglian Protestant states usually used beheading or drowning. (Look closely at the woodcut at lower right.) John Calvin did choose to burn Michael Servetus in Geneva, however, because he wrote in opposition to the doctrine of the Trinity.
  • After Martin Luther posted his 95 Theses in 1517, he continued writing scandalous tracts against the Catholic Church, and was later declared a heretic. In 1521, the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, contacted Luther and promised safe passage to attend the 1521 Diet of Worms—a council of religious and political leaders—and stand on trial. Once there, religious leaders asked if he stood by the opinions he had previously espoused. Luther said that he did, knowing it might mean he would be tortured or burned at the stake. To help Luther escape these fates, Frederick III of Saxony staged Luther’s kidnapping and placed him at Wartburg Castle. Luther disguised himself as a knight, assuming the name Junker Jörg. He spent his time there translating the New Testament from Greek into German so common people could read it.
  • Luther added words in his translation he felt should be in the Scriptures, such as allein (German for alone) at Romans 3:28. Alone is not in the Greek text, but he included it to strengthen and add weight to his theological position.
  • When he came to popularity and power in Germany, Luther opted for a state church model similar to the Roman Catholics. Certain doctrinal violations were considered to flow over into the realm of “the princes” (the state). Luther was not opposed to strong punishment for those who did not line up with his teaching.
  • The Anabaptists were special targets of Luther. Rather than all citizens bowing to religious authorities, their commitment to a believers’ only church allowed them to reshape basic Christian beliefs and practices. Anabaptists emphasized baptism on the basis of adult confessions of faith, instead of infant baptism. Church leaders were chosen from within the community of believers instead of being appointed by church hierarchies, or by state officials. Reforms were based on the church community’s reading of scripture, rather than on the basis of what was politically expedient and approved by princes. Church discipline and social shunning replaced trials and executions of those with whom they disagreed.
  • For worship, Anabaptists gathered in houses, barns and caves to read scripture together. They discussed biblical texts and discerned together, under the leading of the Holy Spirit, how to apply them to daily living. They sang songs composed by their own members based on experiences of persecution and martyrdom. No more majestic cathedrals, chants, organs, monastic choirs, and elaborate liturgies where members were largely spectators. They rejected feudal oaths since their primary loyalty was to God and not to princes and emperors. They advocated a life of peace, rejected violence, refused to carry swords, forgave those who wronged them, and reconciled conflicts between members of the church. Many of them gave their lives for the morsels of truth they grasped from reading Scripture.
  • Luther’s legacy lives on, in the form of another famous leader. When Atlanta pastor Michael King traveled to Germany in 1934, he was so inspired by the story of Luther’s Reformation, he decided to change his name. He also changed the name of his then 5-year-old son, Michael Jr. From that day on, Michael Jr. was known as Martin Luther King, Jr.

Sources: Renaissance & Reformation by William R. Estep; various Internet sources


Will Evangelical Feminism Dethrone Christ?

Since the Scriptures link the headship of the husband over the wife with Christ’s headship over the church, if we are to accept that man is not truly the head of the woman, but merely the inconclusive “source,” can we now accept that Christ is not really the head of the church?

“For wives, this means submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For a husband is the head of his wife as Christ is the head of the church. He is the Savior of his body, the church. As the church submits to Christ, so you wives should submit to your husbands in everything” (Ephesians 5:22-24 NLT).

During the last six decades, Christian feminists joined cultural liberals in gradually rejecting all distinctions between men and women in creation, in cultural life, and in religious leadership. This trend has guided us toward what we are now seeing manifested in our times—a genderless generation splintered into many factions wallowing in abject confusion. They have attempted to explain away the significance of the creation model as well as the clear pronouncements of the New Testament regarding male headship in the family and church.

When the concept of male headship is eliminated, Paul’s analogy in Ephesians falls apart. There is no headship in full equality. Where is true authority if there is no leader who is ultimately responsible? To “progressives,” biblical commands that make common sense are to be dismissed as patriarchal, obsolete, and irrelevant.

Many Evangelical feminists have embraced the imagination of gender “sameness,” which assaults the most basic of biblical concepts as well as natural biology. Men and women are not the same, merely having different reproductive organs. Jesus said, “Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female?” (Matthew 19:4; Genesis 5:2). Feminists tend to deemphasize or ignore the obvious differences in men and women in order to support their demands.

When equality dethroned Christ

The Roman Catholic Church in the Council of Trent (1545-1563) declared that tradition—what the popes and priests had taught and practiced for centuries that was now being challenged in the Reformation—was on a par with Scripture. In one move, they symbolically dethroned Christ and His Word, elevating their self-determined practice to the level of God’s Word. That meant that they would continue to preach and practice what they had been doing even if it did not have the blessing or authority of Scripture. According to Paul’s analogy in Ephesians 5, the church is to subject herself to Christ in everything since He is the head of the body. When Paul wrote the letters from which his teaching is taken, he was writing “command(s) from the Lord Himself” (I Corinthians 14:37 NLT). But the Roman Catholic Church assumed equality with Christ in establishing praxis and dogma—meaning what they say and do may differ from inspired Scripture, but in absolute equality their actions were to be considered to have as much authority as Christ and the Bible.

My question: Could the Apostolic church, the body of believers holding to Acts 2 as its basis for sound salvation doctrine, also be moving toward dismissing all relevant scriptures relating to the headship issue as ancient prejudicial patriarchy and claim full equality for men and women in home and church? If that part of Paul’s Ephesian analogy can be upended, can they also assume equal authority with Christ to rewrite other biblical requirements? Would that not be dethroning Christ and making the church equal in authority to Him? In Ephesians 5, the point is clearly made that the relationship of husband and wife is comparable to that of Christ and the church. If husband and wife are now equal and leaderless, what does that do to Paul’s analogy? How close would that be to the Roman Catholic position of ascribing equal authority to church tradition and culture?

If husband and wife are now fully equal and the wife no longer has to submit to her husband “in everything” as her “head,” is the next step for the church to declare, Catholic-like, equality with Christ in establishing doctrine and/or practice? Are we embracing a so-called “apostolic hermeneutic”—meaning that we will be interpreting Scripture in the light of what we have deemed to be acceptable at some time in the past? Will what is displace what should be according the Scriptures?

Would we be wise to determine what Scripture means by whatever we may be collectively practicing at the time? Is that the new hermeneutic for our times? Now, in the end of this Christian era, are we deciding that the Bible really doesn’t say what we thought it said for 2000 years? Should we assume that from A.D. 60 until 1960 we were parked on ignorant hill and are just now recognizing that the apostles were misogynistic scoundrels whose writings should be dismissed by our more enlightened minds?

True authority remains in the Word of God

Paul used the analogy of Christ and the church by inspiration. The church belongs to Jesus (Matthew 16:18). He started it, and He is still the Head. He has never capitulated. He has never extended equal authority to men. The creation model of the husband as the head of his wife and children is still in force. Absolute equality would render the relationship leaderless. Something with two heads is antithetical to nature. If the church is decapitated, where in the body is the “mind of Christ” (I Corinthians 2:16)?

An interesting sidelight—all Bible translations listed in BibleGateway.com render the Greek kaphale in verse 24 as “head,” with a couple of exceptions that use “leader of…authority over.” The JUB has the Heb. rosh, which also means “head” in the sense of leader. That means that the feminist authors who want to corrupt the meaning of the word to suggest it indicates “source” in this and the I Corinthians 11 context, befitting their narrative, are currently in opposition to more than 50 committees of Greek scholars and linguists, plus their publishers and the vast majority of commentators over the years. They also ignore a basic principle of hermeneutics that when the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense, lest it result in nonsense.

After two thousand years of reading and heeding passages such as Ephesians 5:22-24; I Corinthians 11:2-16, 14:34,35; I Timothy 2:8-15, 3:1-12; Titus 2:1-5; et al, that corroborate male headship, will we now arrogantly presume that secular culture and egalitarian writers have finally struck truth—that men and women are absolutely equal in authority within the home and in the church? Instead of challenging our culture to conform to the Word of God, must we now preach to the church to conform to the imaginations of culture? As someone said, theological confusion results when we first look at what we want and then attempt to build a theology that justifies it.

Are Apostolics involved in this interpretation?

If the generally acknowledged feminization of Christianity has not reached us, why do we now feature articles in our official publications which herald the “feminine side of God” and promote “source” for “head”? Are these concepts being introduced in our own educational institutions? The radical egalitarian interpretation fails the common sense exam as well as the Scripture test because Christ and the church can never be equal. How can we do justice to clear biblical principles when man is not considered the head of the woman, as the Scripture plainly says, but is viewed merely as some ethereal source through a clever exercise in sophistry?

The question stands—if we can force the equalization of the male/female, husband/wife relationship, will the church/Christ authoritorial relationship become the next target?


Which Bible to buy?

“Which translation should I buy?” is a frequently asked question. It depends on several factors. Are you needing a study Bible? One for devotional reading? A Bible for your kids? One that you are familiar with that has English as it was spoken 400 years ago or one with contemporary language? Are modern or medieval idioms preferred? A text that is very accurate as compared to the Greek/Hebrew originals or a paraphrase (I recommend avoiding the latter entirely)?

         Generally speaking, the closer we get to the autographs via the oldest and most reliable manuscripts, the purer the text. This is why the older manuscripts are usually given more weight than those copies that were made hundreds of years later. Bibles that are translated from MSS that include the earliest Hebrew and Greek copies are considered by most scholars as likely being more faithful to the autographs. That is important when choosing a Bible.

In terms of Bible sales, the New International Version and King James Version have held relatively steady over the last 10 years, according to the Evangelical Christian Publishers Association. The data (below) showed that the NIV and KJV held the first and second spots, respectively, in both 2011 and 2020. Other translations also showed relative stability.

Rankings as of January 2020 (numbers in parentheses represent 2011 rankings; the rankings may or may not have changed a little from a year ago):

  1. New International Version (NIV) (1)
  2. King James Version (KJV) (2)
  3. New Living Translation (NLT) (4)
  4. English Standard Version (ESV) (5)
  5. New King James Version (NKJV) (3)
  6. Christian Standard Bible (CSB) (6)
  7. Reina Valera (RV) (not ranked)
  8. New International Reader’s Version (NIrV) (9)
  9. The Message (Message) (8)
  10. New American Standard Bible (NASB) (7)

Source: https://disrn.com/news/top-ten-bestselling-bible-translations

Why are there slight differences in some Bible verses? You will find the answer to this and hundreds of other questions in my recently updated book Searching the Scriptures: Merging Truth, Texts and Translations. The eBook is available at advanceministries.org/store and the hard copy is available from Amazon.com.


Words from around the Net

  • The difference between humans and animals: Animals would never allow the dumbest of the herd to lead them.
  • Grandparents: “We used to attend six-week tent revivals seven nights a week.” Parents: “We used to attend Sunday through Wednesday revivals at  our church.” Us: “We used to attend church occasionally on Sunday mornings.” Our children: “We used to attend church on Mother’s Day and Easter.” Our grandchildren: “What’s church?”
  • “I see people my age out there climbing mountains and zip lining, and here I am feeling good about myself because I got my leg through my underwear without losing my balance.” – Anonymous
  • “Before you become too entranced with gorgeous gadgets and mesmerizing video displays, let me remind you that information is not knowledge, knowledge is not wisdom, and wisdom is not foresight. Each grows out of the other, and we need them all.” – Arthur C. Clarke
  • Theological confusion results when we first look at what we want and then attempt to build a theology that justifies it. – Anonymous (In case you missed it as used above)
  • “I believe in Christianity as I believe in the sun rises and shines; not because I see it, but because by it I see everythin



Biblical Christology: Jesus the Christ

by J. R. Ensey
No study is comparable to the inquiry into the nature of the Godhead. One must know His identity to fully know Jesus. Those who have questions about the Person and work of our Lord will find this volume helpful to their study. Christ is presented as the Incarnate God, the indwelling Spirit, and the Coming King. Includes the text of the Nicene Creed and the Athanasian Creed.

AM Price  $3.95


A Hill To Die On

by J. R. Ensey
Is truth worth dying for? If so, which truth? Which doctrine? This book suggests that there are some things worth risking our reputations, our resources, and perhaps our lives for. Six months ago we would never have thought we would be where we are today as a nation. The Christian faith is rapidly being dismembered and deconstructed to make way for socialism and/or other religions. The rush of endtime prophecy fulfillment should stiffen the backbone of every Christian and make us realize there will be a price to pay for our faith. The nine chapters include:

– A Hill To Die On

– Truth in an Age of Deception

– Unity in an Age of Division

– Righteousness in an Age of Hedonism

– The Church in an Age of Spirituality

– Absolutes in an Age of Relativism

– God and Government

– Is American Christianity Returning to the Social Gospel?

– Our Finest Hour

AM Price  $12.95

Pastoral Epistles

by J. R. Ensey
The apostle Paul wrote three letters to two younger ministers he affectionately called his “sons.” The epistles became part of the canon of Scripture and have served since then as the best instruction available for those in ministry and lay leadership. Doctrine, practical church discipline, lifestyle and much more is all here. The verse-by-verse commentary is accompanied by a complete outline for ease of study and teaching.

AM Price $13.95

To order go to advanceministries.org/store  


Let a little light in…


The Last Word:

Remember: When broad minds meet the narrow gate of truth, they will usually say, “Yes, but…,” and promptly turn left. 

 Stay cool, be right, go straight.



Published in: on July 1, 2021 at 12:01 AM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey June 2021 blog


The First Word

“Do to others whatever you would like them to do to you. This is the essence of all that is taught in the law and the prophets” (Matthew 7:12 NLT).


We proudly saluted…

…the brave men and women on Memorial Day who paid the supreme sacrifice to gain and maintain the freedom we enjoy in America. We must never allow that price to have been in vain.


Simplifying the Bible translation issue

Questions are often raised regarding the authenticity of contemporary Bible translations since they don’t read exactly like the King James Version in some places. The fact that there are some words in the KJV that do not appear in the contemporary versions has given rise to the suggestion that they have been “removed” or “omitted from the Bible” in the effort to water down Christian doctrine. That is not the reason that a few readings in the KJV do not appear in the new versions. Let me explain.

The New Testament  (NT) was written in Koine Greek, a common class dialect of the Roman Empire during NT times. Copies of copies of those original manuscripts (MSS) are all that are currently extant. There are almost 6,000 Greek copies of parts of the NT, many in fragment form. Relatively few codices exist that contain all the books of the NT. Most copies were made after the ninth century when minuscule writing became popular.

By A.D. 400 there were a number of MSS in Middle Eastern, European, and N. African languages translated from the Greek. About that time, the Latin copies were gathered by Jerome and merged into a single volume called the Latin Vulgate. Since Latin had become the lingua franca of the West, the Roman Catholic Church established the Latin Vulgate as their official version. Copies in Greek were discontinued in Alexandria and the West. Only the educated could read Latin and the common people had to depend on the Roman Catholic priests to provide meaning through teaching or liturgy. Bibles in the vernacular of the people were forbidden in many nations. When the Reformation era began, Bibles began to show up in languages most readers could understand. Initially, translators and publishers were persecuted by Roman Catholic leaders and some became martyrs.

The first translation of the Bible into the English language was…..[continue reading this brief article by clicking HERE.]


Historical glimpses

  • During the early days of the Reformation, the matter of baptism surfaced as a sticking point. Was the baptism that the reformers and their disciples received as infants in the state church valid or did one need to be rebaptized (referred to as anabaptism) as a believing adult? The first to receive “believer’s baptism,” according to historian William R. Estep in Renaissance & Reformation, (pp. 183-184) were dissidents from among Ulrich Zwingli’s followers in Zurich, Switzerland. When Zwingli would not affirm the need for rebaptism, Conrad Grebel baptized George Braurock in a home on January 21, 1525. Although the baptism was not by immersion, that practice was bound to follow as step-by-baby step Christianity slowly moved ever closer to the original Apostolic message and practice.
  • According to Estep (pp. 184-185), Martin Luther had originally attempted to reinstate the New Testament form of baptism by immersing his firstborn son, Hans, but he did not continue the practice. As early as 1520 Luther had arrived at the conviction that believers should be baptized by immersion,
    but apparently he refused to take the decisive step of affirming the baptism of adult believers.”
  • Although babies were often immersed when they were baptized in some  groups throughout much of Christian history, full immersion of adults was revived as a common practice in the early 1600s by John Smyth and the Baptists in Northern Europe and England.
  • Felix Manz became the first martyr by Protestants on January 5, 1527. His Anabaptist beliefs condemned him as a seditionist in the eyes of reformer Ulrich Zwingli, who ran Zurich as Calvin ran Geneva. His sentence: “Manz shall be delivered to the executioner, who shall tie his hands, put him into a boat…then strip his bound hands down over his knees, place a stick between his knees and arms, and thus push him into the water [of the River Limmat]; thereby, he shall have atoned to the law and justice…His property shall be confiscated by my lords.” He was the first but not the last to die at the hands of Protestants in this way.
  • John Robinson, a 17th century pastor at Leiden, The Netherlands, inspired the growth of his non-conformist congregation to 300 members. One of them, Willliam Bradford, who later became governor of Plymouth Colony in Massachusetts, compared Robinson’s congregation to the early Christian churches because of its “true piety, humble zeal and fervent love towards God and His ways.”

Robinson entered Leiden University in 1615 to study theology, but by 1617 he and his followers were seeking a more secure and permanent location. In July 1620, while he remained with the majority who were not yet ready to travel, part of his congregation sailed for England aboard the Speedwell. Before their departure from Leiden, Robinson declared to them in a celebrated sermon, “For I am very confident the Lord hath more truth and light yet to break forth out of His holy Word.” The following September, 35 of them left Plymouth on the Mayflower for New England, landing at Plymouth, MA (New England). https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Robinson-English-minister

That proved to be an insight that materialized in a greater measure than Robinson could have imagined. Although truth and light regarding salvation had been in the Bible since the the first century, men were becoming anxious to see it more clearly as the Latter Rain renewal and times of refreshing approached at the dawn of the twentieth century.


Teaching children about baptism

Children should be taught that baptism is not optional but a command (Acts 2:38; 10:48; etc.). It is the “washing away” of our sins. Acts 2:38 combines repentance and baptism as the “package” that deals with our sins.

They should understand that the mode matters. When the word “baptism” appears in the Bible, it means “immersion.” Baptism is linked symbolically with burial in Romans 6:4. One is not truly buried by sprinkling a few grains of dirt over his head. The NT mode was full immersion. John baptized Jesus in the Jordan River (John 3:23). Philip baptized the Ethiopian when they came upon sufficient water (Acts 8:56).

The name matters. The NT church always used the name of Jesus when baptizing converts (Acts 2:38; Acts 10:48; 19:3). No other name identifies us with the Savior (Acts 4:12). Neither Father, Son, nor Holy Spirit is a name.


Lines I liked when I heard them

  • There’s no book, or even a postscript, in the Bible called “Loopholes.”
  • Definitions of traditionalist may vary, depending on who is using the term. Someone suggested this definition: “One who insists on believing and living by the Bible.”
  • The Book, the whole Book, and nothing but the Book.
  • In times of refreshing, when the church is lost in deep worship of God, are the moments when the most sincere decisions are made about our lifestyle and personal commitment.


Are you a transvaxxite?

Vaccine deaths are in the thousands in the U.S. as reported by the CDC/VAERS, and more than twice that many in Europe. But don’t worry about it, we are told. It is perfectly safe. Other factors must have caused the deaths, not the vaccine. (Joseph Goebbels approves this message.)

Some people I personally know, including relatives of mine, who were vaccinated have had severe reactions. If you are interested, please listen to Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, cardiologist and Vice Chief of Medicine at Baylor in Dallas. He is not a quack. He provides a common sense approach to the matter. Here is the link to his message about the vaccine:


My personal doctor has given me a vaccine exemption/variance in writing since I have experienced blood clots in the past. Being vaccinated is a personal decision each individual has to make. This is not a recommendation one way or the other, merely information for you as you contemplate your own health choices.

I recently read the following definition by an unknown individual:


A person who identifies as having been vaccinated even though they haven’t actually been vaccinated. I’ve decided I’m a transvaxxite. Vaccination is a spectrum and you are bigot if you don’t accept me for who I am.


No differences in gender?

Note to U.S. Congress: Get on board!  France has banned the use of gender-neutral language in schools, bucking the recent woke culture trend spreading throughout academia around the world.  – Blaze


Voices worth heeding

  • “If the Right gives up the gender fight, then that’s it. It’s over. Once we’ve surrendered reality itself, what else is there to fight for? I will die on this hill. If this hill is lost, there are none worth keeping after it and nobody left to fight for them anyway.” -Matt Walsh
  • “Live so that when your children think of fairness, caring, and integrity, they think of you.” – H. Jackson Brown, Jr.
  • “What the left is doing is fighting bigotry with bigotry.” – Senator Tim Scott
  • “If you believe that reality is best constituted as a consequence of truth, then you have a responsibility to speak the truth.” – Jordan Peterson
  • “Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.” – Ronald Reagan
  • “It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself. In subjecting opinion to coercion: whom will you make your inquisitors?” —Thomas Jefferson (1781)
  • “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.” – Vladimir Lenin
  • Regarding immigration, “The bosom of America is open to receive not only the opulent and respectable stranger, but the oppressed and persecuted of all Nations and Religions; whom we shall welcome to a participation of all our rights and privileges, if by decency and propriety of conduct they appear to merit the enjoyment.” – George Washington [America has traditionally welcomed legal immigrants, but acceptance of a mass influx of just anyone who can struggle across or is pushed over the border was never America’s policy. Why throw your borrowed money at the nations that are sending them as though it will stem the flow. What a joke.]
  • Kimberly Klacik of Baltimore has reminded us that there are armed police officers guarding the @MSNBC and @CNN headquarters/studies at all times. Think about that every time anyone on those networks talk about defunding the police. They want them defunded where you are, not where they are.
  • A wise man learns from the mistakes of others; a fool cannot learn even from his own. -Anonymous


Ready to eat grass?



Valid assumptions

  • If you are wearing a mask while alone in your car, it will be assumed that it is to curb the urge to lick the windows.
  • If you have to hide the curriculum from the parents of your students, you don’t belong in a classroom or anywhere near children.
  • “Remember the panic when you couldn’t find toilet paper? Wait until you can’t find a police officer.”
  • If you are in a Zoom meeting with a mask on, you don’t need to wear your Biden ID sticker.
  • If someone is photographed wearing a mask on a Zoom call but not wearing one when visiting the elderly, he is a virtue signaling hypocrite, or perhaps just a little ditzy. Or both.
  • If big tech can silence a U.S. president, they can silence us all.
  • The greatest casualty of this pandemic will be science. It has become just another political tool.” – Trey Gowdy



The New Cyclopedic Theological Dictionary (eBook)

by J. R. Ensey
The reference volume based on the biblical, Apostolic viewpoint! Compiled and written by J. R. Ensey.
When you need the definition of a theological term, the description of a religious movement, or the meaning of over a thousand words that are found in reference works and the Bible…turn to The New Cyclopedic Theological Dictionary!

– Over 1000 entries
– Definitions and descriptions of many Bible words, theological terms, and religious movements
– 486 pages of easy-to-read, easy-to-use information
– The only reference volume of its kind! Written from a conservative, apostolic viewpoint, this classic work has enhanced the study habits of thousands of ministers and laymen.

“This dictionary is far more than a word study; it is replete with the background and history of many doctrinal positions and teachings. It also serves as a standard for testing the validity of different theories–an invaluable tool!” -Dr. Marvin Treece

AM price $12.95   Order the searchable eBook format from Advance Ministries.

Available from Amazon in printed form.


by J. R. Ensey
Some younger men have called for reasons that specific holiness standards appear in the UPCI Manual. They were not around when the issues were debated and passed in conferences. It is easier in today’s cultural climate to give up the fight than to take the time to find out why Apostolics believe what we do. Here are 224 pages of some common sense, Word-based answers for our apostolic positions.

• Why do Apostolics embrace the Bible as the Word of God?
• Why do Apostolics teach monotheism?
• Why do Apostolics receive the Holy Spirit and speak in tongues?
• Why do Apostolics disengage from a worldly lifestyle?
• Why do Apostolics abandon or avoid harmful personal practices?
• Why do Apostolics choose modest apparel and shun ornamental jewelry?
• Why do Apostolic ladies refrain from cutting their hair and wearing cosmetics?
• Why do Apostolics live with a blessed hope?

“Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander” (I Peter 3:15,16).

Available from advanceministries.org   price $12.95

Evidential Tongues

by J. R. Ensey
Here is some vital research on a doctrine and practice we hold as foundational—speaking in tongues when one receives the Holy Spirit.

The fact that many in the classical Pentecostal movement have ceased to stress this aspect of the new birth experience has disturbed us. It behooves us to occasionally take a harder look at our fundamental doctrines—not to try to disprove them but to make sure that the girders of truth are still bearing the load of centuries of attacks. To shore up our principle doctrines for each new generation is imperative.

The book walks through the Acts of the Apostles to verify the consistency of the doctrine in the early church. But what happened to it after the first century? Research was done to highlight glossolalia (speaking in tongues) throughout the Dark Ages, into the Reformation period, during the development of various Protestant denominations, and on to Topeka and Azusa St. How it became a tenet of faith in the burgeoning Pentecostal movement is covered. Current views climax the study.

Here’s a historical odyssey that will strengthen your faith.

Available from advanceministries.org  price $7.95


If truth offends, get ready…

How makeup beautifies


The Last Word

“Wise sayings often fall on barren ground, but a kind word is never thrown away.” – Arthur Helps

Amen. Have a great June. May the summer winds always be at your back.



Published in: on June 1, 2021 at 12:08 AM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey blog Mid-May 2021


Welcome to the May 2021 Mid-Month Blog

The First Word

“But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine: That the aged men be sober, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in charity, in patience. The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things; That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed” (Titus 2:1-5 KJV).

“Then the Lord said to me, ‘Write my answer plainly on tablets, so that a runner can carry the correct message to others’” (Habakkuk 2:2 NLT).



Please take time to read the scriptures above before continuing. Thanks.

This will be a brief edition of the blog since only one item is on the agenda. It is a book review, one that is longer than I could put in my regular blog. I felt it important to be timely with the review. May it be helpful to you in both your studies and your book buying.


Book review


THE MAKING OF BIBLICAL WOMANHOOD: How the Subjugation of Women Became Gospel Truth

By Beth Allison Barr; Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2021; 19.99

We Americans are becoming accustomed to redos and resets. The U.S. seems to be in a full political reset at the present time. The church appears to be falling in line with the idea. So I am not surprised that we now have a book about a “remix.”

The feminization of our culture has upended a society that boasted of a foundation built on the Bible, a nation that made its motto “In God we trust.” Our founders put biblical scenes in stone on its monumental buildings of government. Those images are now being defaced and those monuments may soon fall if we continue on the present path. Every tradition and belief seem to be under review.51kJBZidb4S._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_

This is another in a lengthening line of books by feminist authors spelling out how Christian men have historically been spiritual rascals. Barr’s caustic pen scatters words like “subjugation,” “hierarchy” and “subordination,” all carrying a negative connotation, making the modern Christian woman’s status sound eerily like slavery. If one checks for synonyms of subjugation, words like “oppression…conquest…domination…enslavement” will pop up. In other words, Christian men have been bad and need an old fashioned straightening out.

The author consistently reminds her readers that she is a “historian” of note, with multiple letters behind her name. However, omniscience is an attribute of God alone. She approaches the topic of biblical womanhood more from a historical rather than a theological standpoint.

Her book comes as a result of what she feels are pastors’ and church leaders’ misunderstanding of the biblical passages that she feels prove women should automatically be given access to all levels of spiritual leadership and authority. She and her husband struggled with this issue in their position as youth leaders in a complementarian church. They were finally dismissed because of their views. Hurt and disappointment followed. How other women may have been similarly hurt and sidelined through the centuries became a passionate study, and thus this book. Regardless of our personal experience, however, church leaders are not authorized to undo what God has done. Human decrees do not transcend the plain Word of God. Leaders are to love what God loves, hate what God hates, promote what God promotes, and oppose what God opposes. The author’s circular reasoning to make the Bible say something to fit a personal prejudice is an exercise in eisegesis.

The New Testament is filled with examples of gracious treatment of Christian women. From the Day of Pentecost until now the church has benefited from the sincere commitment of dedicated women. The apostle Paul consistently complimented those who worked with him—both men and women—who supported his evangelistic/missionary ministry. Barr views those commendations as advocating and recognizing a level of leadership ministry equal to his own. Many women, including the author, have assumed more than Paul said by those compliments, and have acted on their own feelings and emotions rather than the clear meaning of his words.

Historical actions or inactions do not establish a biblical/theological position. Theology, hermeneutics, context, and the full body of Scriptures must be considered. The author begins with inner feelings that the pastors and theologians she has known were wrong on the issue of female spiritual leadership of men. She would ultimately admit to feeling the same way about the apostle Paul. She shames churches and pastors for not taking the same position. She comes from a perspective of history rather than biblical theology. She is convinced the Bible writers picked up practices from the Roman world and applied them to spiritual roles in the church. She exhibits a low view of Scripture and inspiration—history first then theology. Barr seems to read the Scriptures through the lens of both history and modern culture, rather than with the conviction that the Scriptures flow from the mind of God (II Timothy 3:16) and not merely from the mind of the apostle. As someone has pointed out: “To start with a false premise helps one to end with a flawed conclusion.”

She discovered the writings of a couple of medieval Roman Catholic monks that were construed as generally agreeing with her premise. She quotes them fervently, but they actually say nothing that supports her extreme positions. She quotes them because they placed very little stress on female submission. They wouldn’t, being in constant adoration of Mary, the mother of Jesus. A fifteenth century Catholic wedding text she quoted simply said, a “wife should not blindly follow her husband because she owes allegiance first to Jesus.” Virtually everyone would agree with her when she concludes that “Jesus as head would trump husbandly authority.” She quotes the twelfth century Peter Abelard who claimed that “woman and not man is linked to Christ’s headship” and “instituted him as Christ” since a woman anointed him (Mark 14:3-9).

Barr appeals to the proposition that evangelicals are reading Paul wrong. Complementarians are simply not understanding what Paul is saying when he outlines his “household codes” as she calls them. In her entire chapter on the Pauline codes, she never once dealt with I Timothy 2. Why? Perhaps it was because she views it as one of Paul’s “texts of terror” (her words) for women. Therefore, she feels they must be negated or explained away.

A key passage is Ephesians 5:22-6:9: “For wives, this means submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23 For a husband is the head of his wife as Christ is the head of the church. He is the Savior of his body, the church. 24 As the church submits to Christ, so you wives should submit to your husbands in everything.” No difficult words there; all easy to understand. Just before this in vs. 17-21, Paul speaks to the general church body, including all men and women, about their interpersonal relationships, ending with the admonition of mutual submission. Then, he gets specific about certain groups in the church—wives, husbands, children, slaves, and masters— in v. 22. Wives, here is your responsibility. The men are not excluded. In verses 25-33, the apostle gives the men of the church a stern lesson about how kindly they must treat their wives. Barr, however, begins with v. 21 as though it is commanding husbands and wives to mutually submit. To read the passage in this way, she asserts, “changes everything.” But any honest Bible student in Hermeneutics 101 knows that the specific husband/wife relationship commands begin in v. 22.

The author’s focus was on Galatians 3:28 (“neither male nor female”) to make Paul say that both church and home leadership is gender free. The apostle makes makes no such assertion. Indeed, the ground is level at the foot of the cross. All—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free, men or women—are equal before God in worth and value in the process of redemption. There is no indication here that there would never be another scriptural reference to gender, or freedom, or nationality. Paul did not erase or ignore gender in that verse. If so, did all Jews become Greeks or all Greeks become Jews? Did all slaves become free with that writing?

In the context of dealing with I Corinthians 14:34,35 (womens’ “silence” in church), the author brings Roman events 200 years before Christ into view in order to insinuate that Paul’s words were inspired by Roman consul Cato rather than God. Barr suggests that Paul was quoting the Roman worldview and subtly rebuking the church in Corinth for silencing the women accordingly.

Paul later made a number of specific distinctions and references to men and women and their varying responsibilities. Need we be reminded that things that are different are not the same? God made men and women different in order to do different things. “Oneness” in the faith and in marriage, as in “one flesh,” is achieved even though men and women have varying roles and responsibilities set forth for the home and the kingdom of God.

Barr is a historian, but she needs to brush up on some of her history regarding Roman empire women. I will leave that information for the reader to exhume. Suffice it to say that even Bible women in the Empire, like Lydia and Dorcas, operated thriving businesses and were viewed as upstanding citizens of the community. Barr, however, states that when a Roman wife became a Christian, the household codes of Paul set her free from the “oppressive elements” of Roman world. Again, she posits that Paul was using a “Jesus remix” to tell believers how the gospel set them free. Indeed, they were free from sin in Christ, but not free from the creation order that God established in the beginning. God didn’t change His mind about that between Malachi and Matthew. And no book of the Bible ends with “Hey…just kidding.”

Barr not only twists history but makes a pretzel out of the Scriptures. She acknowledges the household codes in Ephesians 5, Colossians 3:18-19, Ephesians 5: 21-33, I Corinthians 11 and 14, and Titus 2:1-5, but suggests that Paul’s readers knew he meant just the opposite of what he said. The remix meant that Paul was merely using words in a rhetorical fashion that they understood were not what he really meant. What a novel way of reading the Bible she has devised in the 21st century.

The focus of the household codes, Barr says, were not the same as they are interpreted by evangelicals today. The thought came that the author could earn great fame as a magician—“See this coin…this pea…this card? Now you see it, now you don’t! You saw it but it really wasn’t there!” Instead of endowing authority to a man, she insists that “the Christian household codes offer each member of the shared community…the right to hear and act for themselves. Paul’s purpose was not to emphasize male authority.” Evidently, in Barr’s eyes, there is no Christian household leader. It is every person for themselves. In other words, “Don’t believe what you see and read in your Bible. Truth is what I say it is. Trust me. I am a historian.”

Let’s let her speak for herself:

[If Paul was so into male headship], “Why [is] the use of explicit and elaborate maternal imagery to describe God and Christ, who are usually described as male, so popular with twelfth century Cistercian monks?” [What a deep, relevant question!] “Just because modern Evangelicals overlook Paul’s use of maternal imagery, doesn’t mean it isn’t there. It just means that, once again, we have gotten Paul wrong.” (p. 53)

“Paul didn’t tell women to be silent.” (p. 55)

“As a historian, I know there is more to Paul’s letters than his words reveal.”

“Among the women Paul commended in Romans 16: ‘Junia, prominent among the apostles…Junia is identified not simply as an apostle but as one who was prominent among the apostles.’” (pp. 64,65)

“More women than men are identified by their ministry in Romans 16.” (p. 65) Meaning…?

“English Bible translations obscure women’s leadership in the early church.” (p. 65)

“Here I was, walking my student through compelling historical evidence that the problem with women in leadership wasn’t Paul; the problem was with how we misunderstood and obscured Paul.” (p. 66)

“Junia, I showed them, was accepted as an apostle until nearly modern times, when her name began to be translated as a man’s name: Junias.” (p. 67)

“Of course, I told my students, not everyone in the early church supported female leadership. The office of presbyter testifies loudly to how patriarchal prejudices of the ancient world had already crept into Christianity.” (p. 68) Shame on you, Paul.

“‘Dr. Barr, why don’t they teach us this in church?’ I looked at the student, my heart twisting. Most people simply don’t know, I said. Seminary textbooks are often written by pastors—not by historians, and especially by women historians.”

“Trinitarian teachings are central to orthodox Christianity, and complementarians—in their blind pursuit to maintain control over women—have exchanged the truth of God for a gender hierarchy of human origin.” (p. 194)

Before she closes the book, Barr slips in a claim of heresy against her Baptist pastor for teaching the Trinity in a way that she feels is wrong. She quotes him as saying that Jesus is eternally subordinate to His Father, which she opposes as heresy. One wants to say, if she would look a little deeper, she would find even greater heresies embedded in that doctrine. The inclusion of this information was for the purpose of inserting the idea that complementarianism is grounded on this understanding of the Trinity. Does she not know that the doctrine of the Trinity came along much later, long after Paul’s death?

Much of the remainder of the book gives honor to women from the Dark Ages and medieval times who left their husbands and abandoned their children to “go do a work for God.” She praises their courage and willingness to do what God told them to do, even if it meant “defying male authority” or battling literal human-eating dragons. (The dragons were confronted and summarily dispatched with the iconic cross and a sprinkling of holy water.) She rails about male authorities who, Aristotle-like, disdain the female body and uphold the inferiority of women. She is wasting ink and book paper—no Christian man worth his salt fits the imagery she draws. A trek through the swampy areas of Reformation ideologies and Bible translations adds yet other odd flavors to the book.

To recommend this book one would have to dispense with hermeneutics, disregard the traditional meaning of common words, and embrace assumptions over clear Bible teaching. How it got promoted by an assumed conservative on the Internet, then finding its way to a ministerial forum, is indeed puzzling.


Published in: on May 14, 2021 at 11:35 PM  Comments (5)