JREnsey blog for May 2024

Thanks for visiting!

The Word for today

Psalm 25:4-8 NLT: “Show me the right path, O Lord;
point out the road for me to follow.
Lead me by your truth and teach me,
for you are the God who saves me.
All day long I put my hope in you.
Remember, O Lord, your compassion and unfailing love,
which you have shown from long ages past.
Do not remember the rebellious sins of my youth.
Remember me in the light of your unfailing love,
for you are merciful, O Lord.”

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Where is God when we hurt?

With the recent passing of some of my friends, the following words by Melissa Spoelstra struck a chord in my own heart. They may bring peace to your soul as well.

Finding Peace in the Pain

When my father was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, I struggled to embrace the peace that Jesus promised. (See John 14:27.) My feelings were all over the map when I wondered what good could come out of such an upsetting situation.

Maybe you have encountered situations where it felt like God didn’t show up, or that He allowed something devastating to happen. Even in these times, God can receive glory and our faith can be strengthened as we trust His purposes over what makes sense to us.

Jesus knew the pain of loss. His friend Lazarus got sick and died. In John 11, we read that Jesus was “deeply moved in His spirit” (v. 33). He was not apathetic. He shared in the common feeling of grief with those He loved. Death angered Him, and its painful effects grieved. He expressed human emotions, including tears. (See v. 35.) He wasn’t the only one hurting. Martha asked questions ; Mary wept; the mourners cried; and Jesus entered into their pain.

Jesus knows the losses you’ve experienced and longs to enter into your pain as well. He understands your humanity because He put on flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14). I sometimes avoid strong emotions, stuffing them down or reasoning them away. This passage validates that feelings aren’t sinful or a measure of faith. Give yourself biblical permission to express feelings—whether they are celebratory or overflowing grief. Jesus didn’t lack faith. He just felt and expressed human emotions.

My dad only lived 29 days after his cancer diagnosis. He was a Christ follower, so I know he is more alive now than ever. Yet this season has been filled with all sorts of emotions. When we grieve, the pain can feel pointless. But God’s purposes are always good, even when our circumstances are not.

Through the raising of Lazarus, Jesus revealed Himself as the source of resurrection life. When we contemplate death—our own or those we love—we can feel all our feelings and yet hold onto our faith. We can savor peace from life to life if we belong to Jesus.  – Mature Living 3/24

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Trinitarian Dysphoria

There is yet another pestilence abroad in the land. I call it Trinitarian Dysphoria. It is spreading rapidly across Christendom. Dysphoria is a condition of “unhappiness, uneasiness, and dissatisfaction” that feeds mental confusion. The cultural confusion abroad in our society has invaded the religious realm. This strain of  dysphoria has nothing to do with transgenderism, but with the onerous Trinity doctrine.

Folks who think a couple of times a week are tiring of dealing with the nonsensical and unbelievable idea that God exists in three distinct persons, and that the three only constitute one God. Few layman, if any, can begin to satisfactorily explain the doctrine, particularly how a “Son” can be “eternal.” John Calvin couldn’t do it but he burned Michael Servetus, a Spanish physician and theologian, at the stake for not declaring it as truth.

In reviewing the works of the respected Bible commentator and author Millard Erickson, this was found: “At best, the [Trinity] doctrine is puzzling; at worst, it is an outright contradiction. Thus, it appears that while on biblical grounds we must believe it, on logical or rational grounds we cannot believe it. Must we choose between our Christian commitment and our rationality?”[1] Sorry, but biblical or rational grounds are virtually non-existent. If one holds to the Trinity doctrine, they are forced to adopt a measure of incredulity.

Confusion comes from the fact that the doctrine is derived from the deliberations of the post-apostolic “fathers” and church councils, not from the Scriptures, Jesus, or the. apostles. Men like Origin, Tertullian, and Athansius juggled the Greek homoosios and the Latin Personas to come up with a do-equal and co-eternal groping of three entities, but dropping the “three” and calling them “one.” One is a Father and one is the Son but they are co-eternal. One yields to the will of the other yet he cannot be said to be subordinate. The third “proceeds from” either one or both of the others. Eastern and Western Catholicism could never agree on just where the Holy Spirit proceeds from. Modern proponents are sick of trying to explain such a convoluted concept of deities. It is as though they are waiting on the pope or some someone in authority to pronounce it passé and return to what is presented in the Scriptures.

Erickson further stated, “This doctrine in many ways presents strange paradoxes. …It is a widely disputed doctrine, which has provoked discussion throughout all the centuries of the church’s existence. It is held by many with great vehemence and vigor. These [advocates] consider it crucial to the Christian faith. Yet many are unsure of the exact meaning of their belief. It was the very first doctrine dealt with systematically by the church, yet it is still one of the most misunderstood and disputed doctrines.”[2]

The two primary verses that are usually called on to support the doctrine are I John 5:7b-8a and Matthew 28:19. The first has already been declared an interpolation by a majority of textual analysts and scholars, with most modern Bibles removing it from the Bible for lack of manuscript support. The second, Matthew 28:19, is being seriously challenged as being the original words of Jesus. Thatt verse and its context do not delineate a doctrine of the Trinity but presents Jesus and His name as possessing “all power in heaven and earth” and being the sole means of salvation from sin.

Author and theology professor Harold Brown writes: “It has proved impossible for Christians actually to understand the doctrine or to explain it in any comprehensive way. The doctrine of the Trinity…. surpasses our human ability to understand and thus it must be respected as a divine mystery.”[3]

Yet another outspoken theology professor, Louis Berkhof, states: “The Church confesses the Trinity to be a mystery beyond the comprehension of man. The Trinity is a mystery, not merely in the biblical sense of what is a truth, which was formerly hidden but is now revealed; but in the sense that man cannot comprehend it and make it intelligible”[4]

The one God whom came to earth as Jesus does not hide truth from those He wishes to save. He came to reveal truth. In fact, He said, “I am the truth.” The Oneness of God is far simpler than the Trinity to believe and explain. It expresses revealed biblical truth. Jesus spent His lifetime here revealing His true identity. Embrace it. Confess it. It cures Triinitarian Dysphoria.

[1] Millard Erickson, Makiing Sense of the Trinity (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1990), p. 43.
[2] Millard Erickson, God In Three Persons (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1995); pp. 11-12.
[3] Harold Brown, Heresies: Heresy and Orthodoxy in the History of the Church (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers; 2003), p. 128.
[4] Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Louisville, KY: GLH Publishing, 1996), p. 89.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

The Power of ONE

He was born on the banks of the Niobrara River in Nebraska in 1829, near where the Niobrara and the Missouri Rivers merge. He was given the name of Standing Bear. A sense of destiny was upon him that only time and history would reveal. His Native American family were of the Ponca tribe. He rose to be a chief and spokesman for the Poncas. In 1877, his people were forced by federal treaty to leave their tribal home in Nebraska to move to the Indian Nation/Territory in what is now Oklahoma.

The trail to Oklahoma was rugged and difficult. Conditions were harsh and provisions were few where they were forced to live. Over one hundred men, women and children soon perished, including Standing Bear’s 16-year old son, Bear Shield. His father was determined to fulfill his son’s wish to return him to their homeland in Nebraska for burial. He and about thirty others left the reservation in Oklahoma with the body of his son. When they reached the Omaha reservation in Nebraska they stopped for a rest. Chief Standing Bear and his people were arrested there by General George Crook for illegally leaving the reservation in Oklahoma. He was ultimately taken to court in 1879 in Omaha to stand trial. Until that time, Native Americans had little or no standing in court. The American Indians were technically not considered to be “persons” by the law. They were subject only to the Secretary of the Interior.

After all the legal proceedings were done and the lawyers had their say, the judge granted Standing Bear’s request to speak before closing the trial. Attendees—lawyers, reporters, government officials, including many women, were dressed to the nines. Even General Crook and his staff wore their dress blues. The Indians came in their colorful native costumes.

Dressed in his native official robes as chief of the Poncas, Standing Bear stood at the front of the courtroom for several minutes with his hand outstretched to the audience. A hush fell upon the proceedings. Finally, he turned toward the judge and began his famous speech, which some call one of the greatest and most moving speeches in American history. Certainly its effects were far reaching, since the decision resulted in a hundred thousand people being made citizens.

With his hand still extended, now toward Judge Dundy, Standing Bear began with these words: “This hand is not the same color as yours. If I pierce it, red blood will flow and I will feel pain. If you pierce your hand, blood of the same color will also flow and you will feel pain. God made both of us. I am a man.”

Still standing, half facing the audience, he looked past the judge, out of the window, as if gazing at something in the far distance, and continued: “I seem to be standing on the high bank of a great river, with my wife and my little girl at my side. I cannot cross the river and impassable cliffs are behind me. I hear the noise of great waters; I look and see a great flood coming. The waters rise to our feet and then to our knees.I hear my little girl cry, “Save me!” In despair, I look toward the cliffs behind me and I see a dim trail that may lead to a way of life. But no Indian ever passed over that trail. It looks impassable. I make the attempt.

“I take my child by the hand and my wife follows after me. Our feet are torn by the sharp rocks, and the trail is marked by our blood. At last I see a rift in the rocks. Beyond it are green prairies. The swift-running waters of the Niobrara pour down between the green hills. There are the graves of my fathers. There again we will pitch our teepee and build our fires. I see the light of life and liberty just ahead.”

The old chief became silent again. After an appreciable pause, he turned toward the judge with such a look of pathos and suffering on his face, that none who saw it will ever forget, and said, “But in the center of the path there stands a man. I see soldiers behind him in number like the leaves of the trees. If that man gives me permission, I may pass on to life and liberty. If he refuses, I must go back and sink beneath the flood.” In a lower tone, facing the judge, he said, “You are that man.”

He then slowly turned and sat down.

A momentary silence fell upon the courtroom. Tears began coursing down the judge’s face. General Crook leaned forward and put his face in his hands. Women began to sob. Suddenly, as if by one common impulse, the audience rose to their feet and a shout went up. No one heard Judge Dundy say, “Court is dismissed.” There was a rush for Standing Bear. The General was shaking Standing Bear’s hand. Newsmen and ladies gathered around him. It was a high moment in the history of the American legal system. For an hour, Standing Bear had a reception.

A few days later, Judge Dundy issued his famous decision that an Indian was a “person” and was entitled to the protection of the law. Standing Bear and his followers were set free, and with his old wagon and the body of his dead child, he returned to the hunting grounds of his fathers to bury his son with tribal honors.

One man, one speech changed the course of history for all Native Americans. The power of one can truly be awesome.

Adapted from http.//library.timelesstruths.org/Standing_Bear’s_speech

♦♦♦♦♦♦

It’s going around…

A new variant called “Oh, I see!” is going around. I hope you catch it. It opens eyes so they can  see what is really behind the Earth Day movement, and the Anti-Israel Movement. “Death to America!” the rioters shouted. Joining their hatred for Israel and America, they let us see their true colors. Death to America’s industries, western culture, and our constitutional government is what they really mean.

Some caught it as the leftist students rioted and charged into police lines on college campuses to vent their support for Hamas. College presidents seemed surprised and taken aback by the riots. Did they not know what was being taught in the classrooms? Did they not realize what the result would be when they ceased offering courses in western civilization and world history? While the current administration is focused on trying to shut down Christian colleges, like the Grand Canyon Christian University, the Ivy League schools are ablaze with ignorance as they rail against Israel and celebrate Earth Day, contemplating the brief life they expect because of climate change.

The “Oh, I see!” variant may be causing a new lockdown of the classrooms at Columbia and other left-wing universities as they switch to virtual classes. How about shutting down the entire Ivy League system? The money in their coffers turned over to the government could just about pay off our national debt! When we wake up some morning and learn that our currency is worthless, many will confess that they now see what the agenda was all along—not Israel vs. Hamas, not claimate change, not racism but the fall of America into totalitarianism.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Why not?

• Electric vehicle owners should only be allowed to charge their cars using solar or wind power, otherwise it is just pretend. – Patriot Post

• Folks that believe no one should be treated differently based on their skin color are now being called “racist!” Should that be categorized as artificial intelligence?

• I’ve noticed that the same people doing the fact checking are controlled by the people doing the lying. Shouldn’t we call it what it is—propaganda?

• Someone suggested that Election Day should replace April 1 as “Fool’s Day.” If the next election is handled like the last one, who could not agree?

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Artificial Intelligence

• Does Ivermectin work? Google: NO!  Can men get pregnant? Google: YES!

• The next day after proclaiming Easter Sunday “Transgender Visibility Day,” President Biden was asked about it. His response? “What? I didn’t do that.”

• Just like everything else, the Baltimore bridge collapse and the solar eclipse was due to climate change.

• Before we work on artificial intelligence, why don’t we do something about real stupidity?

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Sense and nonsense

“How much are daddy’s ministerial dues going up, momma?”

Eclipse for my flat earth friends. Compliments of Bro. Clinton Willis

This train should level the playing field.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Last Words

“I like to see a man proud of the place in which he lives. I like to see a man live so that his place will be proud of him.” – Abraham Lincoln

Be open to change, but don’t let go of your values and convictions. Those who are guided by principle can change—or molt like our fowl friends, shedding that which holds them back from maturity—but we don’t evolve from one “kind” to another. Change doesn’t mean becoming something other than what God made us through conversion. Change should always be evaluated on the basis of will this make me/my church better Christians? Will it eventually take us toward a place where we do not want to go? – JRE

Enjoy the remainder of Spring!

JREnsey

Published in: on May 1, 2024 at 7:01 AM  Leave a Comment  

JREnsey blog April 2024

The Word for today

I Peter 2:1-3: “So get rid of all evil behavior. Be done with all deceit, hypocrisy, jealousy, and all unkind speech. Like newborn babies, you must crave pure spiritual milk so that you will grow into a full experience of salvation. Cry out for this nourishment, now that you have had a taste of the Lord’s kindness” (NLT).

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Trump and Biden offer Easter messages

It’s election season, of course, and candidates are appealing for every vote out there. They do so in strange ways at times.

Former President Donald Trump wished a “happy Easter” to all his political adversaries, RINOs, Democrats, and “Socialists, Marxists, & communists who are killing our nation.” In past Easter segments, he has touted the Bible and mentioned “the holy week and the resurrection of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” He has acknowledged his Christian background from his youth which has apparently lingered in his mind.

President Joe Biden also had an Easter message. He declared Easter Sunday, March 31, 2024, as “Transgender Visibility Day.” He said, “Today, we send a message to all transgender Americans. You are loved. You are heard. You are understood. You belong. You are America, and my entire Administration and I have your back. …I call upon all Americans to join us in lifting up the lives and voices of transgender people throughout our nation.” It is reported that he further denied anyone at the White House to post any word about Christ, the resurrection, or display any Christian symbols on this day.

What a contrast.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Isn’t it true…

that if the economy was doing great you wouldn’t have to tell people every day? We would know. – PP

…that a lie is around the world before truth has its britches on?

…that the strength of a lie is in our inability to recognize it?

…that “you are the master of your unspoken words, but a slave to the words you have spoken”? – Winston Churchill

…that you can “forgive” debt when it is your money, but when forcing others to pay for it isn’t “forgiveness,” it’s theft? PP

…that tiny-brained folk would much rather hear and believe a negative rumor than the positive truth?

…that if you are doing better than you were three years ago, you are probably an illegal immigrant.

the most powerful factors in the world are clear ideas in the minds of energetic men of good will”? – J. Arthur Thomson

…that one of the basic differences between Catholicism and Apostolic Pentecostals is that the RCC formed their fundamental doctrines from the writings and discussions of their philosophizing “church fathers” (c. A.D. 200-450), while Pentecostals have formed their beliefs and practices from the Bible records of the teaching of Jesus and the Apostles?

…that we should never let anyone take away our freedoms because of “the greater good,” because freedom is the greater good? PP

…that the church can survive without America, but America cannot survive without the church? Our laws were made for a God-fearing people. When America no longer has a majority of God-fearing people, our laws will not fit this nation. Even now they are being changed to fit a godless minority.

…that if we do not learn from history we are bound to repeat it?

…that most of the oil is in Texas, but all of the dipsticks are in Washington?

…Stephen Hawkins said, “Religion is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark.” I said, “Atheism is a fairy story for people afraid of the light.”  – John Lennox

…that we should pray that this scripture would never be fulfilled by our beloved Apostolic Movement: “Childish leaders oppress my people, and women rule over them. O my people, your leaders mislead you; they send you down the wrong road” (Isaiah 3:12 NLT)?

…that April 1 should  be officially declared “President Joe Biden Day” in America?

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Hold on to your hat!

Adam Clarke’s Bombshell Commentary on Luke 1:35

Adam Clarke was an astute exegete who said some things that let us know that he had grave concerns about the doctrine of the Trinity. Here he exposes a major factor of the doctrine as being heretical. His comments on Luke 1:35 express his position:

And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

“The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee” – This conception shall take place suddenly, and the Holy Spirit himself shall be the grand operator. The power, δυναμις, the miracle-working power of the Most High shall overshadow thee, to accomplish this purpose, and to protect thee from danger. As there is a plain allusion to the Spirit of God brooding over the face of the waters, to render them prolific, Genesis 1:2, I am the more firmly established in the opinion advanced on Matthew 1:20, that the rudiments of the human nature of Christ was a real creation in the womb of the virgin, by the energy of the Spirit of God.

“Therefore also that holy thing (or person) – shall be called the Son of God” – We may plainly perceive here, that the angel does not give the appellation of Son of God to the Divine nature of Christ; but to that holy person or thing, το ἁγιον, which was to be born of the virgin, by the energy of the Holy Spirit. The Divine nature could not be born of the virgin; the human nature was born of her. The Divine nature had no beginning; it was God manifested in the flesh, 1 Timothy 3:16; it was that Word which being in the beginning (from eternity) with God, John 1:2, was afterwards made flesh, (became manifest in human nature), and

Luke 1:35-37.

tabernacled among us, John 1:14. Of this Divine nature the angel does not particularly speak here, but of the tabernacle or shrine which God was now preparing for it, viz. the holy thing that was to be born of the virgin. Two natures must ever be distinguished in Christ: the human nature, in reference to which he is the Son of God and inferior to him, Mark 13:32; John 5:19; John 14:28, and the Divine nature which was from eternity, and equal to God, John 1:1; John 10:30; Romans 9:5; Colossians 1:16-18. It is true, that to Jesus the Christ, as he appeared among men, every characteristic of the Divine nature is sometimes attributed, without appearing to make any distinction between the Divine and human natures; but is there any part of the Scriptures in which it is plainly said that the Divine nature of Jesus was the Son of God? Here, I trust, I may be permitted to say, with all due respect for those who differ from me, that the doctrine of the eternal Sonship of Christ is, in my opinion, anti-scriptural, and highly dangerous. This doctrine I reject for the following reasons: –

1st. I have not been able to find any express declaration in the Scriptures concerning it.

2dly. If Christ be the Son of God as to his Divine nature, then he cannot be eternal; for son implies a father; and father implies, in reference to son, precedency in time, if not in nature too. Father and son imply the idea of generation; and generation implies a time in which it was effected, and time also antecedent to such generation.

3dly. If Christ be the Son of God, as to his Divine nature, then the Father is of necessity prior, consequently superior to him.

4thly. Again, if this Divine nature were begotten of the Father, then it must be in time; i.e. there was a period in which it did not exist, and a period when it began to exist. This destroys the eternity of our blessed Lord, and robs him at once of his Godhead.

5thly. To say that he was begotten from all eternity, is, in my opinion, absurd; and the phrase eternal Son is a positive self-contradiction. Eternity is that which has had no beginning, nor stands in any reference to Time. Son supposes time, generation, and father; and time also antecedent to such generation. Therefore the conjunction of these two terms, Son and eternity is absolutely impossible, as they imply essentially different and opposite ideas.

The enemies of Christ’s Divinity have, in all ages, availed themselves of this incautious method of treating this subject, and on this ground, have ever had the advantage of the defenders of the Godhead of Christ. This doctrine of the eternal Sonship destroys the deity of Christ; now, if his deity be taken away, the whole Gospel scheme of redemption is ruined. On this ground, the atonement of Christ cannot have been of infinite merit, and consequently could not purchase pardon for the offenses of mankind, nor give any right to, or possession of, an eternal glory. The very use of this phrase is both absurd and dangerous; therefore let all those who value Jesus and their salvation abide by the Scriptures. This doctrine of the eternal Sonship, as it has been lately explained in many a pamphlet, and many a paper in magazines, I must and do consider as an awful heresy, and mere sheer Arianism; which, in many cases, has terminated in Socinianism, and that in Deism. From such heterodoxies, and their abetters, may God save his Church! Amen!

Source: https://biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke/luke/1.htm

Ol’ man Clarke was stirred up, wasn’t he? Do you agree or disagree with him? Comments are welcome. You can comment on the postings below.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

 

The current level of science knowledge of Harvard grads:

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Last Words

The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the most discoveries, is not ‘Eureka!’ but ‘That’s funny…’”—Isaac Asimov, Biochemistry professor and author

I wonder what would be the most common exclamation uttered when one finally sees the oneness of the Godhead in Scripture? Share your ideas!

Enjoy April…it is one of my favorite months.

JREnsey

Published in: on April 1, 2024 at 7:42 AM  Comments (2)  

JREnsey blog for March 2024


The Word for today

Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord” (I Corinthians 15:58).

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Book review

The Two Treatises of  Servetus on the Errors of the Trinity

Author: Michael Servetus (1511-1553)

Publisher: Harvard University, 1932; reprint: Wipf and Stock, Eugene, OR, 2013; 264 pages; paperback; 25.75 at Amazon

Michael Servetus could have changed the course of the Protestant Reformation—and religious faith in America in the process. And he might have if John Calvin had listened to him rather than burning him at the stake. And if King James in England had given two other non-Trinitarian ministers, Bartholomew Legate and  Edward Wightman, an honest hearing in 1612 instead of burning them alive, the Mayflower might have had a different crew in 1620 as it landed at Plymouth Rock.

Those three men gave their lives for truth about the Trinity doctrine. Like other reformers, Calvin was fearful of challenging the cardinal doctrine of the RCC. It was too ingrained in the Christian mind to tackle. They had to settle for smaller issues, like communion, the sale of indulgences, and priestly vestments. King James just wanted no challengers to his personal biases.

But Servetus, by the time he was twenty, had set his sights on the “big one”—the Trinity. It was the untouchable cornerstone of the church around which liturgy was constructed, but this artisan’s tools were not hammer and chisel but pen and paper. At age 21 his keen mind produced works exposing the cracks in that stony doctrine. He was a literary genius, a wordsmith par excellence. He could quote virtually every Bible writer, ECF, philosopher and classic author as though they were personal acquaintances. Perhaps no other man of his time could have produced these treatises. A subsequent and the last of his books was called Restoration of Christianity. In the past, l have reviewed a tome dubbed Out of the Flames, by Lawrence Goldstone, about Servetus’ book Restoration and the impact it had on his life and the Reformation. The original of that work lies deep in the bowels of the Bibliothèque Nationale de France in Paris. While visiting there, I tried to see it but was unable to do so. It is listed as one of the rarest and most valuable books in the world.

Servetus’ images stand in several cities of Europe. He was a medical genius as well. He is renowned in this field for his work on the circulation of blood and his observations on pulmonary circulation.

But alas, those who are too far ahead of their time become a threat to the tiny-brained folk already seated in positions of power. He had to die, they said. But his written works have become immortal. Few men could have written Treatises, and perhaps none other at age 21.

His views on the Godhead are quite close to our own Apostolic position—how close each reader can decide for himself. But you will know by the time you read the first few pages that there is no three-person Godhead or an eternal Son. To read his approach, one will feel his passion for truth. He joined his quick wit with powerful word choices and theological insights that shook the religious establishment. Trinitarian word jugglers did not have a chance.

Worth your time and worth the price.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Is the Bible just a “book of rules”?

The Bible isn’t merely “a book of rules,” an oft-stated accusation by those ignorant of the Scriptures, but some rules are included there. We all understand rules. They form our lives from its earlies stages. Every nation has rules, called “laws.” Every home and parent has particular rules that must be obeyed, which may include admonitions like…

…Don’t eat with your fingers

…Sit up straight

…Don’t leave your clothes on the floor

…Don’t run through the house with scissors in your hand

…Don’t stay out past 9:00 p.m.

…Don’t talk back to your parents

  • Schools have rules by the score. Libraries have rules. Nations have rules called laws. Municipalities and government have particular rules and ordinances.
  • Churches have to have guidelines, else some would not be distinguishable from a homeless enclave or a cookout on the Malibu beach. If members had no encouragement from Paul or Peter, they might look and live like anyone else…sporting mini skirts, shorts, or beachwear or whatever. Visitors can show up in some trashy or ungodly attire and likely won’t be asked to leave, but members know better and they will never be used in any capacity to teach or represent the church in any way without a lifestyle that reflects a compliant and willing spirit. No one “forces” anyone to wear or do anything they don’t want to wear or do. Just if they wish to participate at this level of involvement, there are requirements. Most every place of employment where workers meet the public there are guidelines and expectations. Why not churches too?
  • The Bible has some guidelines and “rules,” called commands, to guide believers in right living. Just a quick glance over a few pages can be found several rules: I Timothy 2:9-12; 5:1; 5: 21-22; 6:17; II Timothy 1:13,14; 2:16; Titus 3:1-2; James 2:1; I Peter 1:16; 3:1,8; I Peter 5:5,8; I John 2:15; 3:24. Committed Christians do not disdain rules that are biblically based. Only persons who wish to conduct their lives according to their selfish desires despise rules. See Ephesians 2:1-3; I Peter 4:3.

Rules serve like the metal railings on highway curves and places where a car might plunge off into a ditch or off of a mountain road. They are placed there for our safety. The very word obedience indicates that there are principles and specific commands that we are to honor. Low expectations do not motivate one to obedience. Jesus said, “ And anyone who believes in God’s Son has eternal life. Anyone who doesn’t obey the Son will never experience eternal life but remains under God’s angry judgment” (John 3:36 NLT).

You would not want to live in a nation without laws. You would not want your child to attend a school without rules. You would not want to attend a church that had no guidelines for members. They are, in part, what gives the church definition, shape, and meaning—and a respected, authoritative voice. That makes sense.

In fact, real Christianity is loaded with common sense.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

If it’s not a baby…

She has all the human chromosomes in place from day one, and is a genetically unique one-of-a-kind human being; she has a beating heart and her own blood type; she has eyes, legs, hands, fingernails, fingerprints, all her internal organs, bones, teeth, and independent brain waves, and she can kick, swim, turn her head back and forth, make facial gestures, grasp objects and even have dreams. …Doesn’t that sound an awful lot like a human being? If she’s not a child, then what is she?

         The scientific data has removed any legitimate doubt about what is growing inside the woman. The baby is not just a “blob,” “a mass of tissue,” “uterine contents,” “birth matter,” or “the products of conception”—these are deceptive euphemisms designed to disguise the truth that is now clearly known: she or he, but not “it”—is a real human child.” – Mark Mittelberg, The Questions Christians Hope No One Will Ask (Carol Stream, IL; Tyndale House, 2010); p. 165.

Well spoken, Mark.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

The Intercession of Christ For Sinners

“Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:25).

The Tabernacle in the Wilderness provided the type and setting for the amazing truth that would later be conveyed in this verse by the writer of Hebrews. The earthly Tabernacle in the Wilderness was patterned after the Tabernacle in Heaven (Hebrews 8:5), having the same instruments, items, spaces and purpose. It featured a Holy Place, the Most Holy Place, and a Mercy Seat upon which the atoning blood of the sacrifice was to be sprinkled.

The role played by the earthly Tabernacle was that a sacrifice (a bullock) without blemish was to be brought and slain upon the altar on the Day of Atonement. The High Priest would enter the Holy Place, the first room inside the Tabernacle, where the table of shewbread, the golden menorah, and the altar of incense were situated. He would offer the incense, then return to the outer court to get the bowl of blood from the brazen altar. He would reenter the Holy Place but proceed past the thick veil into the Most Holy Place where stood the Ark of the Covenant, containing the stones upon which the ten commandments were inscribed, the rod of Aaron which had miraculously budded, and a container of manna, the food that sustained the Israelites on their wilderness journey. The lid of the Ark was overshadowed by two golden cherubim. Underneath their wings, which touched over the middle of the Ark, was the Mercy Seat, toward and beyond which the High Priest would sprinkle the atoning blood (Leviticus 16:14). When this was done, the sins of the Hebrew people were rolled ahead one year (Leviticus 16:34) until the day of atonement the following year.

This earthly process would be displaced by Christ’s intercessory sacrifice on Calvary. His mediation and interposition for sinners came into sharp focus during the days just prior to His death. His prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane expressed an extraordinary passion for the lost. As He prayed, sweat like great drops of blood fell from His brow. Shortly afterward, when Christ, the literal Son of God, died on Calvary, His sacrifice would be honored in Heaven as….. [to continue reading this article, CLICK HERE.]

♦♦♦♦♦♦

How the Switch to “Fossil Fuels” Saved the Forests of New England

Throughout the thousands of years of human history that preceded the 20th century, the primary fuel—in fact, almost the only fuel–for heating, cooking, smelting metallic ores, producing glass, blacksmithing and all other such uses was wood, cut in immense quantities from the forests of the six inhabited continents.  Even to the present day, in not a few places, particularly in Central and South America, and rural parts of Asia and Africa, wood is still the primary fuel for most of these activities.

When Europeans first began to settle on the eastern coast of North America, particularly what became known as “New England” shortly after 1600, the

region was heavily timbered with vast virgin forests of almost unimaginable extent and diversity, certainly far beyond anything known to the settlers in their European homelands.  An estimated 90% of the land was forest, the other 10% being mostly land the native populace had previously cleared for their gardens and farms of corn, pumpkins, sunflowers and other native crops.  The colonists would also clear land for farms and gardens, and do so to a much greater extent than the Indians had.

These extravagant forests were soon utilized for every imaginable use—houses, barns, fencing, ship-building, wagon-making, and fuel for blacksmithing, glass making, ore smelting, and especially cooking and heating.  Early colonial homes with their large hearth fireplaces would require 10 or 20 cords annually, which consumed an ever-increasing quantity of the forest’s production as the population rapidly grew.

As these forests were cut, overcut and depleted, the great piney woods of the Great Lake states began to provide the bulk of the construction timber in the mid- to late-19th century.  But exploitation of the remaining New England forests for fuel wood continued, until by 1900, only about 10% of the land remained in forest, and the annual cut exceeded the annual growth.  But then, so-called “fossil fuels”—coal, petroleum, natural gas—began to be utilized for fuel, replacing much of the wood cut for this purpose.  As a result, the annual growth of New England’s forests began to exceed the annual cut, and the forest areas expanded, until a century later, a full 40% of New England was in permanent stands of trees.  Fossil fuels had saved the forests of New England, as petroleum (particularly kerosene) had saved the whales in the mid-19th century.

Doug Kutilek AISI v20n5

♦♦♦♦♦♦

How to get “hell” moving

A Harvard professor said that “all hell broke loose” and he was forced to go out in public with armed security after he published a study that found no evidence of racial bias in police shootings.

During a sit-down conversation with Bari Weiss of The Free Press, Harvard Economics Professor Roland Fryer discussed the fallout from a 2016 study he published on racial bias in Houston policing. Read the story here: Harvard professor says ‘all hell broke loose’ when his study found no racial bias in police shootings (msn.com)

Now we know how to get hell moving…dare to tell the truth.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Will it ever stop getting better?

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Last Words

A little b0y was heard talking to himself as he strode through his backyard, baseball cap in place and toting a ball and bat. “I’m the greatest baseball player in the world,” he said proudly. Then he tossed the ball into the air, swung and missed. Undaunted, he picked up the ball, threw it into the air and said, “I’m the greatest baseball player ever,” and again swung and missed. He paused a moment to examine the ball and bat carefully. Then once again he threw the ball into the air and said, “I’m the greatest baseball player who ever lived. “He swung the bat hard, but again missed the ball. “Wow,” he exclaimed. “What a pitcher!”‘ – Robert Schuller, God’s Vitimin C for the Spirit.

Sometimes a change of viewpoint is wise, even for preachers.

JREnsey

Published in: on March 1, 2024 at 1:50 AM  Leave a Comment  

JREnsey blog for February 2024

The Word for today

II Thessalonians 2:3: “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a departing first, and that that man of sin be disclosed, even the son of perdition.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Wonderful words

A dear friend sent me the words of a song, the chorus of which I will share below:

Hope has hands, freedom has feet;

Truth will stand, the Word will speak;

The holy and lowly will finally embrace,

For love has a heartbeat, and grace has a face.

[The chorus of “Grace Has A Face” by Phil Cross]

Wow! The work of a wordsmith!

♦♦♦♦♦♦ 

Prayer

“Prayer is not something that you DO; prayer is something that you ARE. Prayer flows automatically out of living sacrifices. Prayer is simply the verbal expressions of the meditations of your heart. So NOT praying is the result of dead sacrifice. God replaced dead sacrifices because they had limited value. They were to easy to forget. You gave, then just walked away. A living sacrifice is different. It requires daily maintenance and daily conversation. You’re decaying if you’re not praying!’  –  Steve Willoughby

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Where have all the aliens gone?

Has anyone noticed? Since the whistleblower who testified before the Congress last year, spilling the beans on the government and the space aliens, the silence on the topic is deafening. Virtually no one has reported seeing a UFO/UAP or has been abducted by aliens. No USAF pilot has reported an encounter unless I missed it on the news. Do you think the space travelers heard that their jig was up? Have they decided to pass us and head on over to Mars? Perhaps they saw that it was too crowded here and they needed more room to land and do whatever aliens do.

But suddenly, a couple of weeks ago, the social media was set ablaze with a new video of one flying over a military bases in Iraq. The bizarre clip was posted by artist and filmmaker Jeremy Corbell. Hmmmmm….an artist and filmmaker. How convenient. The “video” shows something like a balloon with legs, and trailing some wires or something. It was dubbed “the Jellyfish.” It appears to be transparent…at times. Honestly, it looked like an escapee from a very dated and pixelated video game. It could only be seen in the “thermal spectrum,” they said. Reading on, Mr. Corbell insists it was real and corroborated by unnamed witnesses, supposedly wearing special thermal glasses at the moment the UAP appeared. One can only wonder: Who flew alongside of this “thing” to video it?

Mr. Corbell was recently interviewed at his desk which was beside a classic model of a flying saucer. (see photo). Obviously a serious devotee. You can watch this Jellyfish video and others here:  https://www.foxnews.com/us/ufo-revolution-docuseries-shows-uap-flying-over-military-base-blows-up-decades-conspiracies-expert

He said the alien craft fell into a nearby lake and stayed submerged for 17 minutes, after which it came up and zoomed off into the wild blue yonder at a 45 degree angle. Supposedly the unnamed witnesses with a stopwatch said nothing to the base personnel to come take a look in the lake to see if the craft could be retrieved. They were too busy timing the submersion. Now we are being told that this actually occurred back in 2017-18, over five years ago. I guess the process of film editing takes a long time.

So…we are back to expectantly watching. Keep your camera handy. You never know when a UAP will fly over. You may want to purchase some thermal vision glasses so you won’t miss it.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

“No cause for alarm!”

Popular researcher and author, Doug Kutilek, shares the thoughts of noted Baptist leader, educator and pastor John Broadus regarding textual criticism:

“The solicitude, and even alarm, which some persons feel in regard to the encroachments of text-criticism, must be regarded as without cause.  Instead of shaking faith in Scripture, these researches will ultimately strengthen faith.  When the shock of abandoning a familiar expression has passed, one almost invariably begins to see that the true text is best.  The general teachings of the New Testament as to doctrine and duty are now known to be established independently of all passages that contain doubtful readings.  And why should we wonder if it is sometimes difficult to determine the true text?  There is known to be a similar uncertainty as to the translation and interpretation of some passages.  This excites no alarm or anxiety, nor should we feel disturbed about occasional uncertainty of text.  And the danger of subjective bias in judging as to the text, is no greater than in regard to interpretation and translation.”

John A. Broadus, Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew, ix (Valley Forge: the Judson Press, 1886)

♦♦♦♦♦♦

For those who are still concerned…

…about the “sixteen verses” that are in the KJV but not in most contemporary versions, we recommended they check out the following article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament_verses_not_included_in_modern_English_translations#cite_note-standard-5

In it will be found the listed verses and why they differ from the KJV reading. It is heavily footnoted and presented in an objective style. One will find the article very interesting and helpful.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Manuscripts support Oneness

As reported last month, the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNSTM) recently released a series of newly digitized manuscripts. The more MSS they find, the more the words themselves are studied, the more they point to the man Jesus Christ being the personal manifestation of the Lord God Himself in the flesh. The message of one God in Christ is gaining adherents while more and more ministers and exegetes across the spectrum of the Christian faith are seeing the fallacies and weakness of the doctrine of the Trinity. The more manuscripts of the New Testament come to light the more it has become evident that the doctrine is on a downward path. It is unintelligible, unbiblical, and indefensible. May God continue to open the eyes of those whose hearts are already open to truth to see the light of the glorious fact that God is one, not a trinity of persons. Let us pray together for a revival of Apostolic doctrine around the world. Breaking with what has been the most fundamental doctrine of the Roman Catholic Churches, as well as those who are Protestant, is a difficult matter for them. Pray for courage for all of them who are struggling with that doctrine.

If you are interested in more information about the manuscripts and the biblical text itself, Dr. Wallace has a set of videos called The Basics of New Testament Textual Criticism. It is fabulously informative. They are FREE! Download them and watch them at your convenience. It is eye-opening by a master communicator and skilled conservative Greek grammarian. Worth your time.  Here is the LINK:  https://itunes.apple.com/us/itunes-u/basics-new-testament-textual/id446655163?mt=10

You’re welcome.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

The way it WAS…

The way it IS…

We grew these beards to prove we were mature:

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Harvard’s new curriculum additions

Now, can anyone wonder why I and others have pleaded with parents and pastors for years to avoid the pitfalls of Ivy League and State colleges for their education. It all depends on what one wishes the student to turn out to be—someone dedicated to “Queering the World” and “Defeating Capitalism Through Marxism,” (courses at Harvard) or learning how to make an honest living while keeping one’s Christian faith. And no university’s curriculum would be complete without a course on Shakespearean poetry featuring the lines that suggest “queer desire,” or a course on ideologies such as “Black Radical Tradition” and “Black Religion and Sexuality.” Undermining the character of both the individual and the nation seems to be the goal.  What would a diploma featuring a passing score on those classes be worth to any entity but the current government in DC?

Check out the full story HERE:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/welcome-harvard-spend-317800-learn-queering-world-threesome-dating-apps

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Last Word

  • Charles Spurgeon said, “The world doesn’t read the Bible. The world reads Christians.” He was sounding like Paul in II Corinthians 3:2.
  • Your own version: “You are writing a Gospel, a chapter each day, by deeds that you do and words that you say. Men read what you write, whether faithless or true; Say, what is the Gospel, according to you?”

Stay warm, keep The Book close at hand. May its marginal notes made by your pen be an inspiration to you in your later years.

JREnsey

Published in: on February 1, 2024 at 1:54 AM  Comments (1)  

JREnsey blog January 2024

Happy New Year! Welcome to the first 2024 blog!

The Word for today

 “And this is his commandment: We must believe in the name of his Son, Jesus Christ, and love one another, just as he commanded us” (I John 3:23 NLT).

♦♦♦♦♦♦

The Serenity Prayer

Some time ago I read a prayer prayed by Reinhold Niebuhr that really seemed to make sense. I like things that make sense, even prayers, so I wrote it down. You may have read it, too.

God, grant me the serenity to accept the things

I cannot change;

The courage to change the things I can,

And the wisdom to know the difference.

That prayer, authored by Dr. Reinhold Niebuhr, can quieten the disturbed spirit within us when we don’t know how to take the next step. It may interrupt our charging ahead into family matters and life situations that are actually too tough and beyond our ability to manage or control.

I recently read of an interesting way others think about difficult life challenges. It was in a “can’t lay it down” book called The Change Agent by Damon West, a young Texas man who spent time in prison learning about life—not just prison life but life as it is lived by all. While incarcerated, he learned there are two lines in life:

The line on the top is God’s line. It represents all the things He can touch and do. If we try to touch them, problems arise. We have to leave them to Him. Our over-involvement quickly becomes a source of frustration and sometimes disillusionment.

The bottom line is our line—the things we can change. Many situations will demand courage, humility, and self-discipline. Those virtues are admittedly in short supply today. That is why the things we can change are on the short line.

So we pray for those things that will help us address the changes that we can effect.

There are four things WE —you and me—can change and perhaps control:

1) What we think.

2) What we say.

3) What we feel.

4) What we do.

That’s basically our limit. Give everything else to God was Niebuhr’s point, I think. Knowing the difference is the wisdom we must pray for and develop. It will tell us when to say, “That’s not on my line!”

So when you are all balled up in a tight situation and trouble is staring you in the face, take a moment and pray this prayer. Let God soothe your nerves when He says, “Let me handle it.”

♦♦♦♦♦♦

New Bible manuscripts being found and digitized

CSNTM, the Center for the Studies of New Testament Manuscripts, was founded by Dr. Daniel Wallace, who serves as it Executive Director as well as Senior Research Professor of NT Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary. Dr. Wallace, is committed to following in the footsteps of the countless scribes who copied the New Testament for later generations. He leads his team to travel the world digitizing ancient manuscripts

CSNTM is committed to following in the footsteps of the countless scribes who copied the New Testament for later generations. As one scribe wrote at the end of his manuscript (pictured here, the colophon outlined in red and printed at right) more than one thousand years ago: “The hand that wrote this is rotting in the grave, but the letters remain until the fullness of the times.”

Dr. Wallace often posts a brief video about the manuscripts that ultimately brought the Word of God down to us. A recent post was dedicated to answering the question: “How many manuscripts did Erasmus use when he published the first critical edition of the Greek New Testament? It is only six minutes in length. It would be well worth a few minutes of your time to listen to this noted expert tell about the manuscripts that were available to Erasmus when he merged them to create the Greek New Testament. Over a hundred years and many editions later, that work would become known as the Textus Receptus, or Received Text. It would form the basis for Luther’s German NT and most of the early English Bibles, including the KJV. You will find it an interesting and helpful six minutes. Here is the link: https://www.csntm.org/2023/05/03/ask-the-prof-how-many-manuscripts-did-erasmus-use-when-he-published-the-first-critical-edition-of-the-greek-new-testament/

At right is a sample page from the Revelation manuscript used by Erasmus in creating the Greek New Testament in 1516.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

A visit with Kelsey Griffin

My wife and I enjoyed a recent visit with Bro. Griffin at his home in China Spring, TX, near Waco. We started our active ministry at the same time and are just a few months apart in age. His tenure as Instructor at Texas Bible College paralleled and overlapped mine. He was an amazing teacher and beloved by the students. His unique style lodged memories in the minds of all who heard him. After leaving TBC shortly after I retired in 1996, he traveled extensively at home and abroad teaching and sharing his wealth of Bible knowledge. He settled down in St. Paul, MN for several years to teach at Apostolic Bible Institute before retiring to Texas a few years ago.

Before returning to TBC as president in 1982, I was pastoring in Wichita Falls, TX. In 1979 we baptized twenty-three airmen from nearby Shepherd AFB. At least three of them became Apostolic ministers. One of them was James Fitts. After I returned to TBC, he and his wife came three years later after his tenure in the military. He then went to Anchorage, AK  and planted a church. He pastored for 32 years before turning it over to his son due to ill health. He visited us recently at Living Way Church in Conroe, TX. We had a wonderful time together turning the pages of our memories. Before he boarded a plane back to Alaska, he gave me a gift to pass on to Bro. Griffin.

A few days later, we drove to Bro. Griffin’s home and delivered it. What a great reunion. It had been several years since we had an opportunity to visit with him. Although he is wheelchair-bound, having broken both hips, he still communicates by phone text daily with scores of ministers who enjoy his scriptures and comments.

Bro. Griffin attends Bro. Steve Daywitt’s church in China Spring. He is given a few minutes each Sunday to share one of his scriptural nuggets with the congregation. The church, with financial and construction aid from former students and friends, built him a three room apartment not far from the church. We thank all  of you who helped make “a room for the prophet” possible, especially Steve and Leticia Daywitt.

Kelsey Griffin is a true soldier of the cross. Remember him when you pray.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

How intelligent are you?

According to some experts (definition: anyone fifty miles from home carrying a briefcase), there are four types of intelligence:

1) Intelligence Quotient (IQ)

2) Emotional Quotient (EQ)

3) Social Quotient (SQ)

4) Adversity Quotient (AQ)

  1. Intelligence Quotient (IQ): this is the measure of your level of comprehension. You need IQ to reason, solve math, memorize things, and recall lessons.
  2. Emotional Quotient (EQ): this is the measure of your ability to maintain peace with others, keep to time, be responsible, be honest, respect boundaries, be humble, genuine and considerate.
  3. Social Quotient (SQ): this is the measure of your ability to build a network of friends and maintain it over a long period of time.

People that have higher EQ and SQ tend to go further in life than those with a high IQ but low EQ and SQ. Most schools capitalize on improving IQ levels while EQ and SQ are played down.

A man of high IQ can end up being employed by a man of high EQ and SQ even though he has an average IQ.

Your EQ represents your Character, while your SQ represents your Charisma. Give in to habits that will improve these three Qs, especially your EQ and SQ.

Now there is a 4th one, a new paradigm:

  1. The Adversity Quotient (AQ): The measure of your ability to go through a rough patch in life, and come out of it without losing your mind.

When faced with troubles, AQ determines who might give up, who might abandon their family, and who would possibly consider suicide.

Parents please expose your children to other areas of life than just Academics. They should embrace manual labor (never use work as a form of punishment), sports and arts to some degree.

Develop their IQ, as well as their EQ, SQ and AQ. They should become multifaceted human beings able to do things independently of their parents.

Finally, do not prepare the road for your children. Prepare your children for the road.

(I will let our readers evaluate the wisdom and benefit of this article. It was excerpted from: https://cambrilearn.com/blog)

PS: You might ask yourself, which quotient do I personally need upgraded? Or, you may want to grade yourself on a 1-5 scale on each of the quotients.

You can also subscribe to Quora or join the Quaint Quibblers Quorum.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Vaccine, anyone?

I recently spent a couple of days, not consecutively, in the hospital’s ER. They asked me twice about getting my vaccines—the Covid and the flu. I had to explain to them that I don’t volunteer for innoculations, unless it is required to go overseas to some country that is known for certain diseases and it is a requirement for a visa.

Florida Surgeon General has alerted us to the discovery of DNA fragments within Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines. And who knows what else? Has anyone noticed we’re running out of unproven conspiracy theories?

See attached letter and link below.

OSF Preprints | DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

How the “evil” petroleum industry single-handedly saved the whales

Did you realize that THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY SAVED THE WHALES? This is absolutely true. In the first half of the 19th century, the primary fuel for night time illumination was whale oil burned in lamps. Whales were hunted down and slaughtered by the thousands to provide this fuel. But in 1859, Colonel Drake drilled the first oil well in western Pennsylvania and the primary commercial product refined from crude oil at that time by refiners (including John D. Rockefeller in Cleveland) was kerosene, which was far more abundant, far cheaper and far easier to produce than whale oil. As a result, people stopped burning whale oil for light, the hunting of whales nearly stopped, and the populations were able to recover. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how the petroleum industry saved the whales. Next time, we’ll talk about how fossil fuels saved the forests of New England.

Doug Kutilek, in “As I See It,” v20/4/23

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Views from the playpen

 Since the new year is often represented by babies, we decided to fall into line.

“I’m scheduled to speak at the Ladies’ Conference in a few years!”

“That was a very relaxing sermon! I will meditate on it for awhile.”

“Either shave that prickly beard or forget about a hug from me. Understood?”

Why some policemen retire early:

We used to call it a Snowman, but evidently not this one.

♦♦♦♦♦♦

Last Words

• Today, I am marked safe from attending Harvard, and Columbia, and Cornell, and Yale, and…well, any university that has “Ivy” in its description or “State” in its name. How about you?

• “Regarding the current pool of women heading Ivy League universities, there are very smart women in the academic marketplace, but apparently they have to dumb down the pool when the selection process comports with the leftist DEI narrative.” – Mark Alexander

• For those seeking a copy of William Penn’s booklet on Oneness titled The Sandy Foundation Shaken, it can be bought on Amazon or read free at https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Sandy_Foundation_Shaken/MsEItVQQUOoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PR6&printsec=frontcover

F. F. Bruce had a way with words:

“Steadfast adherence to the apostles’ teaching, and not the production of an impressive pedigree, is the best evidence of being built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets.”

“It is a vain thing for Christian individuals or groups to imagine that they can better attain to the fullness of spiritual maturity if they isolate themselves from their fellow-believers.” – The Epistle to the Ephesians (London: Pickering & Inglis, Ltd. 1961);  pp. 57,68.

* HAPPY NEW YEAR to all our subscribers and contacts. If you know of someone who may like to be on our notification list, please share this post with them and encourage them to subscribe.

Let’s all go to Heaven and have a good time on the way!

JREnsey

Published in: on January 1, 2024 at 1:01 AM  Comments (1)